Papers for
robotics integration teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
ForceTwin identifies precise physics for better robot object handling
ForceTwin: Physics-informed Digital Twins for Robotic Manipulation from Instrumented Human Interaction
Abstract: Manipulating objects requires understanding not only their motion, but also the physical properties that determine it. For articulated objects, these include inertia, friction, and mechanisms such as springs or door closers, whose effects can vary with configuration and velocity. Such properties are not directly observable from appearance: visually identical doors may require very different effort to manipulate. Existing digital-twin pipelines recover primarily kinematics or assign static physical parameters from visual and language priors, which can yield physically implausible estimates. As a result, state-dependent mechanism dynamics remain unidentified and are not represented in standard asset formats. We present ForceTwin, a system for identifying physics-informed digital twins of articulated objects from instrumented human interaction. A person probes an object using a handheld force-sensing gripper, providing synchronized poses and interaction forces from which we estimate the articulation, parametric dynamics including inertia, Coulomb friction, viscous damping, and a structured neural residual capturing state-dependent mechanism forces. ForceTwin nearly halves the inertial-parameter error of a VLM prior. As a feedforward dynamics model for impedance control on a Spot and a Franka FR3, ForceTwin achieves 87% goal completion across nine object-embodiment pairs, compared with 60% using VLM-prior and 57% using kinematics-only twins, with the largest gains on objects whose strong mechanisms cause both baselines to stall. We further use the identified twins to train whole-body door-traversal policies and deploy them in the real world. Project Page: https://timengelbracht.github.io/forcetwin-website/
UAV navigation aligns language commands with diverse safe flight paths
VLM-MPPI: Grounding Natural Language in Behaviorally Diverse Trajectories for Aerial Navigation
Abstract: We present a hierarchical UAV navigation framework that aligns natural-language intent with dynamically feasible flight behaviors in cluttered indoor environments. To bridge the gap between abstract semantics and low-level control, we employ a parallelized ensemble of six behavior-conditioned Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) planners. Crucially, by designing mode-specific guiding costs and sampling biases, we induce distinct trajectory modes that converge to unique behavioral means, yielding a compact set of intentionally diverse candidates rather than mere stochastic variations. We project these 3D candidates onto the onboard first-person-view RGB stream, turning language grounding into a visual action selection problem. A pretrained vision--language model (VLM) asynchronously selects the candidate index given the overlaid FPV image and a natural-language prompt, while MPPI replans at 20Hz and a PID-based low-level controller tracks the selected trajectory. We implement the full pipeline in NVIDIA Isaac Sim and on a real-world quadrotor platform equipped with LiDAR and RGB sensing. Experiments in both simulation and real-world flights show semantically meaningful behavior diversity, robust language alignment despite VLM latency, and safe, repeatable flight across all modes, achieving 100% task success in our evaluated scenarios.
Large language models steady networked control systems with slow supervision
Large Language Models in the Loop: A Stability- and Network-Aware Survey in Networked Control, Cyber-Physical, and Multi-Agent Systems
Abstract: Modern networked control systems (NCSs), cyber-physical systems (CPSs), and complex multi-agent network systems (CNSs) increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) for high-level decision-making. However, the slow, stochastic nature of LLMs directly conflicts with the strict stability and safety guarantees required by these physical systems. This survey presents a unified analysis of how LLMs can be admitted into the control loop of NCS, CPS, and CNS without compromising closed-loop guarantees. We organize this around a core principle: the LLM operates as a slow supervisor adjusting high-level goals and constraints, while a fast, certified inner loop maintains physical stability. Under this framework, LLM integration maps directly to classical networked control challenges, where inference latency acts as delay, API failures as packet dropouts, tokenization as quantization, and hallucinations as bounded disturbances. We assess current developments across all these three domains, highlighting that rising model capabilities are frequently accompanied by a drop in formal safety assurances. Finally, we propose concrete future research directions, identifying the widespread lack of formal stability proofs as the field's central open problem.