Papers for

robotics control engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

ContractEval reveals hidden failures in AI procedural task completion

ContractEval: Query-Conditioned Execution Matching for Procedural Instruction Conformance

Abstract: As LLM agents move from answering questions to carrying out procedures, failures can be unwarranted rather than visibly wrong: the final response looks acceptable even though the system skipped the check, branch, dependency, or invariant that made the answer justified. Output-only evaluation sees the answer, and trace-aware judging sees activity, but neither identifies which obligations were active for the query. We introduce CONTRACTEVAL, a diagnostic framework for making those active obligations explicit. It represents procedural instructions as query-active obligations and matches them against response or trace evidence, turning omissions, wrong branches, ordering errors, extra actions, invariant breaches, and output-contract violations into distinct conformance failures. On a controlled suite of audited procedural contracts, output-only and trace-aware LLM judges miss many injected structural failures; under gold expected and observed graphs, ContractEval detects and localizes all of them. LLM-backed extraction preserves much of this signal but remains calibration-sensitive. ContractEval is therefore not a compliance guarantee; it makes procedural conformance auditable rather than implicit in final-answer quality.

Tue 8 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
When AI systems follow step-by-step instructions, sometimes they seem to do things right but actually skip important steps or checks. The authors created ContractEval to spot these hidden mistakes by making clear which rules should apply to the AI’s task and checking if they really did. This method can find errors that other ways miss, like doing things out of order or breaking key rules. ContractEval helps people audit AI behaviors instead of just guessing if the final answer looks okay.
Open 2609.09458v1

Distributed control defends large robot teams against stealthy attacks

Distributed Secure Learning Control for Large-scale Multirobots under Stealthy Actuator Attacks

Abstract: Distributed learning control for multirobot systems (MRS) offers significant flexibility in presence of uncertainties but lacks provable performance guarantees. A promising direction involves integrating reinforcement learning (RL) into distributed model predictive control (DMPC), leveraging the strengths of RL in nonlinear policy design and the receding-horizon replanning capabilities of DMPC. However, ensuring secure control within such a learning framework under malicious cyber attacks, particularly stealthy ones, remains a critical challenge, because the distributed policies generation depends on information exchange among neighbors, where compromised agents can rapidly influence the behavior of others through the communication network. This article proposes a distributed secure learning control (DSLC) framework for large-scale MRS under malicious, stealthy actuator attacks. Our framework offers two key features: (i) a unified approach that enables secure learning control across various coordination scenarios and (ii) a game-theoretic distributed learning-based predictive control strategy that learns how to balance the attacker and defender through a differential-game based DMPC framework. Specifically, DSLC employs a distributed attacker-actor-critic architecture to learn the optimal defense and attack policies online within each prediction interval. Unlike numerical optimization-based controllers that calculate open-loop control sequences, our method simultaneously generates adversarial attack policies and corresponding defense policies in analytical closed-loop form. The defense policies could be directly generalized to MRS with varying scales and diverse actuator attack probabilities. The effectiveness and scalability of DSLC are validated through comprehensive simulations and real-world experiments in multiple wheeled robots via various control tasks.

Mon 7 SeptRobotics
The gist
Controlling groups of robots that work together is tricky, especially when some robots might be secretly hacked to cause trouble. The authors designed a way for these robots to learn how to defend themselves against hidden attacks on their controls while still working as a team. They use a clever strategy where the robots learn both how to attack and defend in a game-like setup, improving security on the fly. Their method works for large robot teams, and they tested it in real-world experiments with wheeled robots.
Open 2609.06896v1