Abstract: In many real-life matching problems, waiting agents might abandon before being matched, such as patients deceasing before receiving organs, passengers/drivers cancelling ride requests, or raw materials/intermediary products degrading in production lines. This poses the need for incorporating reneging in stochastic matching models. In this work, we consider matching models on hypergraphs with batch arrivals and general-weight matchings. Since our model allows fractional weights, we may not be able to talk about individual items, and thus reneging is not required to be independent between items of the same class. For the simplicity sake's, we assume items arrive at discrete time. We show that stability depends on the exact nature of reneging, in stark contrast with the non-reneging case where it depends on the arrivals only through the arrival rates. To our best knowledge, this is the first such sensitivity result in stochastic matching. We uncover a new stabilising mechanism which exists neither in the non-reneging case nor in the graph case, which explains why incorporating reneging in stochastic matching is not straightforward. Together with balancing mechanism as hinted in the online assignment framework for the non-reneging case, it gives a criterion necessary and sufficient for stability. Finally, whilst verifying stability is a hard problem, we give a family of MaxWeight-type policies parameterised by $\varepsilon > 0$, which are maximally stabilising for all $\varepsilon$ sufficiently small. Unfortunately there is no effective bound for $\varepsilon$, but we show how to adjust its value during implementation.