Papers for

resource allocation planners

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Improved algorithms find fair diverse sets with guaranteed distances

Rounding the Ball LP for Fair Max-Min Diversification

Abstract: Given $n$ points in a metric space, partitioned into groups, $X_1,\dots,X_m$, and integer quotas, $k_1,\dots,k_m$, summing to $k$, the Fair Max-Min Diversification problem asks for a set of $k$ points, exactly $k_i$ from each group $X_i$, maximizing the minimum pairwise distance. Addanki et al. (ICDT 2022) described a ball LP for this problem and rounding algorithms that yield a factor 2 approximation whose fairness holds only in expectation and a factor 6 approximation with relaxed fairness guarantees, as well as an $(m+1)$-approximation with exact fairness. We introduce two new algorithms. The first method refines the rounding of Addanki et al., yielding a 2-approximate solution that is $\varepsilon$-fair with high probability, meaning that from every group $X_i$, at least $(1-\varepsilon) k_i$ points are chosen. The second method in polynomial time returns a 4-approximation to the optimal value of the exact fairness version. In time $n^{O(1)} 2^{O(k)}$, which is fixed-parameter tractable in $k$, we achieve an exactly fair 4-approximation. Our method adapts the augmenting procedure behind Haxell's theorem (Graphs Combin., 1995). This approximation factor does not depend on $m$. Moreover, we show that no rounding of the ball LP achieves a smaller factor with exact fairness.

Mon 28 SeptData Structures and Algorithms
The gist
The problem is about picking points from different groups so that the chosen points are not too close to each other, while respecting how many points must come from each group. Previous methods could either keep exact group counts but had poorer distance guarantees or keep distances good only on average. This paper offers new ways to pick points that get close to the best minimum distance while almost exactly meeting group quotas with high probability. When the exact group counts are required, their algorithm still improves the distance guarantee compared to before. They also show no method using the existing linear program can do better with exact fairness.
Open → 2609.34269v1

Connected fair divisions exist for shared chores among any agents

Connected EF1 Allocations Exist in Discrete Chore Cutting

Abstract: In this paper, we prove the existence of an envy-free up to one item (EF1) division for a discrete chore. Our approach builds on the powerful framework of Simmons-Su, which leverages Sperner's lemma to guarantee the existence of a simplex corresponding to a sequence of similar fractional divisions, ensuring that each agent is satisfied with a different bundle. Bilò et al. [2022] introduced a rounding technique that converts the fractional divisions into a connected integral EF1 division for goods when there are at most four agents, and this method was later extended by Igarashi [2023] to accommodate any number of agents. However, these rounding techniques for goods do not directly apply to chores because the definitions of EF1 differ in the two settings. To overcome this asymmetry, we modify the existing rounding techniques and show that connected EF1 divisions exist for a discrete chore.

Sat 26 SeptComputer Science and Game Theory
The gist
Deciding who does which chores fairly is a real challenge, especially when chores can't be split up nicely. This paper shows that it's always possible to divide chores so that everyone feels their share is almost fair, even if the chores are connected and indivisible. The researchers adapted methods that worked for sharing goods to now work for chores, overcoming tricky differences in how fairness is defined for chores versus goods. This means fair chore divisions can be guaranteed for any number of people.
Open → 2609.32545v1