Papers for

recruitment platform engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

User intent based premium people recommendation improves linkedin matches

PAIR: Preference-Aligned Intent Retrieval for Premium People Recommendation at LinkedIn

Abstract: General-purpose embeddings trained on profile similarity often misrank candidates in professional networks, where relevance is inherently complementary rather than symmetric. For example, job seekers usually engage with recruiters rather than peers with similar credentials. Current user recommendation systems are often built on profile similarity or social signals such as shared connections, which are effective in friend-oriented social networks where users tend to connect with similar people or within existing social circles. However, this does not hold in professional platforms like LinkedIn, where interactions are often goal-driven and cross-role interactions, requiring matching based on complementary intents rather than similarity or social proximity. In this paper, we propose Preference-Aligned Intent Retrieval, a retrieval framework that is designed to model user intent preference instead of profile similarity. Our approach is inspired by the preference-learning perspective of Direct Preference Optimization, but instantiates preference learning as an exposure-conditioned multi-negative contrastive objective over embeddings. This formulation simplifies training and scales efficiently to large candidate sets without requiring an explicit reference model. Furthermore, we incorporate user interaction history by aggregating click histories with positional encoding to capture temporal order, which enables constant-cost updates of user representations over a fixed history window, allowing new interactions to be incorporated without re-encoding history. As a result, personalization can be updated efficiently using lightweight CPU operations without repeated LLM inference during serving. We evaluate PAIR on LinkedIn's Premium retrieval task. A 0.6B parameter model achieves a MAR@100 of 0.45.

Thu 22 OctInformation RetrievalMachine Learning
The gist
Professional networks like LinkedIn differ from friendship networks because people interact based on goals, not just similarity. The authors found that matching people for job-related reasons requires understanding who wants what, not just how similar profiles are. They created a method called PAIR that learns user preferences and updates recommendations quickly by using recent interactions without constant heavy computation. This approach leads to better ranking of candidates for premium users looking for connections like recruiters and job seekers.
Open → 2610.30941v1