Papers for
real-time ai developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Existing omnimodal AI assistants struggle to help reliably in daily life
Omni-Life: Benchmarking Omnimodal Real-Time AI Assistants in People's Daily Lives
Abstract: Real-time omnimodal assistants are expected to support people in everyday life, but audiovisual understanding alone does not establish whether they can provide timely and appropriate help. We introduce Omni-Life, a benchmark grounded in real-world user needs, deployment scenarios, and device-dependent observations. It combines controlled video synthesis for hazardous situations and edge cases with annotated real-world videos under a shared temporal protocol. The benchmark contains 400 videos: 290 requiring assistance, with 555 required intervention events, and 110 requiring silence throughout to test whether models can withhold unnecessary responses when no assistance is needed. We evaluate twelve configurations featuring mainstream real-time omnimodal models, jointly assessing event coverage, response content, timing, and unwanted output. At most 4.48% of videos requiring assistance are handled completely correctly. To examine practical deployment strategies, we study task reminders and response-latency tolerance. Reminders can improve recall by 17.12 percentage points but add approximately 4.6 unwanted responses per minute of reference silence. Increasing latency tolerance by 10s improves recall by at most 5.95 percentage points. These results show that existing models remain insufficient to deliver reliable assistance in real-life applications, calling for tailored model optimization in instruction following, timely proactive intervention, and withholding responses when assistance is not needed.
Freebar improves real-time asynchronous video line action success rates
Barrier-Constrained Guidance For Real-time Asynchronous VLA Execution
Abstract: While asynchronous execution enables VLA models to operate in real-time environments by predicting the next chunk during execution, it inevitably introduces boundary misalignment with the committed action stream. Existing delay-aware solutions address this at the prohibitive cost of extensive retraining, architectural modifications, or fixed-prefix inpainting that inflates computation when low latency is vital. To address these problems, we propose FreeBar, a training-free real-time inference plugin that enables robust asynchronous execution with only marginal additional inference cost by casting chunk alignment in flow-based VLAs as barrier-guided action-space constraint. Specifically, FreeBar introduces a lightweight Control Barrier Function (CBF)-inspired consistency constraint between consecutive action chunks and solves the resulting correction in closed form, avoiding costly backpropagation through the VLA action head. By progressively tightening the consistency bound during generation, FreeBar aligns generated chunks with the committed execution stream while preserving early-stage generative and within-chunk future action flexibility,. Across Kinetix, RoboCasa, and diverse real-world robotic platforms with multiple VLA backbones, FreeBar improves success rates over naive asynchronous execution by 10%--15% on average, with larger gains in highly dynamic scenarios. It also preserves real-time computational efficiency, decreasing inference latency per action chunk over 45% than RTC. Additionally, as a universal plugin, FreeBar remains robust across distinct latency environments, base policies, and hyperparameter settings.