Papers for

real estate platform developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Generative 3D home models created from few panoramic photos

Holi-Spatial 360: Generative Reconstruction from Sparse Panoramas for Spatial Rendering and Intelligence

Abstract: Spatial intelligence requires scalable 3D environments that are both photorealistic and semantically grounded, yet existing indoor datasets are dominated by room-scale captures and costly LiDAR acquisition. Online real-estate platforms offer abundant panoramas of diverse multi-room homes, but sparse viewpoints and texture-poor regions make reconstruction severely under-constrained. We introduce Holi-Spatial 360, a generative reconstruction and data curation framework for converting these panoramas into annotated multi-room 3D environments. Because reconstruction quality bounds subsequent generation, our Correspondence-Guided Geometric Optimization converts feed-forward reconstruction priors into reliable cross-view constraints and builds a coherent 3D Gaussian Splatting representation as 3D spatial memory. Adapted single-image and video priors then restore appearance and complete continuous trajectories while preserving observed content. The reconstructed scenes support arbitrary RGB-D rendering and an automated curation pipeline that combines end-to-end 3D grounding with VLM-based verification. Holi360 contains over 1K multi-room 3DGS scenes, more than 100K instance annotations, and 2M spatial question-answer pairs. We also introduce the Holi360 benchmark to evaluate the spatial understanding of VLMs in real-world, multi-room indoor environments. Experiments demonstrate superior reconstruction and curation quality under sparse panoramic inputs, while fine-tuning VLMs on Holi360 substantially improves spatial reasoning capabilities.

Wed 14 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Capturing full 3D models of multi-room indoor spaces usually needs lots of expensive hardware and detailed scans. The authors developed a system that builds detailed and realistic 3D models using just a few panorama photos taken in homes, which are easy to get from real estate sites. Their method cleverly combines different computer vision techniques to fill in missing parts and check accuracy, producing large datasets with room layouts and object labels. They also tested how well visual AI understands these reconstructed spaces, finding improved results when trained on their dataset.
Open → 2610.19502v1

Ai housing recommendations often miss better rental options despite following preferences

Following the Preference, Missing the Optimum: Compliance Without Optimization in AI Housing Recommendation

Abstract: Large language models are becoming the first point of contact for consumer search in domains where the stakes are material and the law is explicit. Existing audits show that models steer housing seekers by perceived identity, but none can say what a user loses when a recommender overlooks a suitable option, for want of an enumerated inventory to score omissions against. We audit AI housing recommendation against a verifiable ground truth. For each of 150 synthetic renter scenarios in New York City we build a pool of 120 real listings with known rent, bedrooms and GTFS-computed transit commute, compute the exact set satisfying the renter's stated constraints, and derive its Pareto frontier. The primary outcome assumes no utility function: a recommendation is strictly dominated if the same pool holds a listing cheaper, faster to commute from and no smaller in bedrooms. Across 9,945 calls to three models from two vendors, compliance is near-perfect (1.8% violation against a 66.6% random floor), yet 39.0% of recommendations are strictly dominated, and the dominating listing is a median 900 USD/month cheaper and 3.5 minutes closer. A within-scenario manipulation separates two capabilities usually conflated: changing one sentence moves median recommended rent by 646 USD/month in the correct direction, so preferences are honored, yet recommendations still sit 606 USD/month above the five cheapest qualifying listings on the same screen, and an unambiguous lexicographic instruction gives no improvement under equivalence testing against a pre-specified 50 USD/month bound. The gap widens with candidate-set size and replicates across OpenAI and Anthropic models to within 3 USD. We characterize the failure as compliance without optimization, propose dominance-rate instrumentation as a deployable diagnostic, and release all code, prompts and per-call results.

Wed 9 SeptComputers and SocietyInformation Retrieval
The gist
When people use AI to find apartments, the AI usually respects what they say they want, like budget or number of bedrooms. But the researchers found that the AI still often suggests places that are not the best deals—more expensive and with longer commutes—even when cheaper and better options exist. The AI follows the user's rules but doesn't always pick the optimal choice. This was tested on many made-up renter cases in New York City using real listings. The authors suggest a way to measure this problem so future AI systems can improve.
Open → 2609.10856v1