quantum hardware teams

Abstract: Clifford and matchgate circuits are canonical families of classically simulable quantum circuits. Their intersection, the matchgate-Clifford group, plays an important role in randomized fermionic protocols and in matchgate synthesis. Its adjoint action is isomorphic to the group of unit-determinant signed permutations of $2n$ Majorana modes, and we study optimal exact synthesis in this group. That is, given a target unitary and a gate set, output an $n$-qubit circuit implementing the target using the fewest operations. We show that the complexity of this problem strongly depends on the gate set. In particular, we study gate sets consisting of Majorana braids with different connectivity graphs. For path and complete graphs, we prove that the problem is classically solvable in $\mathcal{O}\left(n^2\right)$ time, and we provide explicit gate-optimal compilers. In addition, we prove that when the connectivity graph is a tree, the decision version of the optimal synthesis problem becomes NP-complete. Finally, we benchmark our optimal compiler on chains of up to $n=80$ qubits against those of \texttt{Qiskit} and \texttt{Tket}, obtaining circuits with constant factor improvements $\times2.57$ and $\times2.28$ in the total number of gates, respectively.

Abstract: Quantum software testing (QST) is a central quality-assurance activity for checking whether quantum programs conform to their specifications. In the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, gate, decoherence, and measurement errors distort observed outputs, making it difficult to distinguish program defects from noise. The existing noise-aware QST literature typically mitigates or models noise before applying a test oracle. However, these strategies can incur substantial cost and depend on calibration data, model training, or backend-specific information, limiting their applicability. We present Qomino, a dominance-guided QST approach for judging tests from noisy samples without a separate noise-estimation or mitigation phase. The approach combines decomposition-aware inverse construction, comparison of the expected outcome with the strongest observed competitor, and bounded retries for inconclusive decisions. We evaluate Qomino on 30 controlled buggy variants from six Qiskit programs and six simulated noisy backends, comparing it with six baselines spanning statistical, quantum-specific, and learning-based methods. Qomino achieves 85.65% accuracy over all six programs and 99.95% in the restricted two-program evaluation, significantly outperforming the corresponding baselines. Across the evaluated programs and backends under the stated settings, Qomino is faster than the compared quantum-specific and learning-based methods. Ablation and retry analyses support the contributions of its main components.

Abstract: We study the transverse field Ising model, defined by the Hamiltonian $H =\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i, j\in [n]} J_{ij} Z_i Z_j +\sum_{i=1}^n h_i^z Z_i + η\sum_{i} X_i$ where $J $ is the symmetric interaction matrix, and $η$ is the transverse field strength. Let $Δ(J)=λ_{\max}(J)-λ_{\min}(J)$ be the spectral width of $J.$ When the inverse temperature $β\geq0$ satisfies $Δ(J)\cdot\frac{\tanh(βη)}η\leq1$, we give a randomized classical algorithm that approximates the partition function $Z(β)=\operatorname{Tr}(e^{-βH})$ to a given relative error $ε\in(0,1)$ in time polynomial in $n$, $β$, the model parameters, and $ε^{-1}$. When $ Δ(J) \cdot \frac{\tanh(βη)}η > 1 ,$ we show that approximating $ Z(β)$ within an $\exp(o(n))$-multiplicative factor is $\textbf{NP}$-hard, and thus unlikely to admit an efficient classical or quantum algorithms under standard complexity theoretic assumptions. Furthermore, in the regime $Δ(J)\cdot \frac{\tanh(βη)}η\leq 1,$ we provide an efficient randomized classical algorithm that approximates Pauli string observables of the Gibbs state $ ρ_β= \frac{e^{-βH}}{\operatorname{Tr}(e^{-βH})}$ within an arbitrarily small additive error. In the special case when the observable is also diagonal in the $X$-basis, i.e. $P \in \{I, X\}^{\otimes n}$, the algorithm further achieves arbitrarily small relative error.

Abstract: Distributed quantum computing (DQC) has been proposed as a way to scale quantum algorithms for practical applications beyond monolithic quantum processor architectures. Among these applications, quantum chemistry is widely regarded as one of the most promising use cases for quantum computing. In this work, we estimate the distributed-resource requirements of unitary coupled-cluster (UCC) ansätze for quantum chemistry, focusing on unitary coupled-cluster singles and doubles (UCCSD), unitary pair coupled-cluster doubles (UpCCD), and unitary pair coupled-cluster with generalized singles and doubles (UpCCGSD) circuits for hydrogen chains. We focus on a teleportation-based approach to DQC, quantitatively comparing a naive distribution method to the output of the TeleSABRE algorithm. For both approaches, we estimate the cost of handling nonlocal two-qubit gates across a fixed midpoint or quarter-point partition, reporting Bell-pair/classical-communication costs in teleportation. Across Jordan-Wigner and Bravyi-Kitaev, we find that UpCCD with spin-blocked Jordan-Wigner ordering gives the most favorable scaling, while UCCSD incurs substantially larger distributed-resource requirements.

Abstract: For many important optimization problems we are restricted to approximate solutions in practice due to computational complexity. Distinct from the exact optimization setting, approximate optimization admits performance measures beyond whether the optimum is found, with different tradeoffs and complexity. For MaxCut, a near-unity (ordinary) approximation ratio can coexist with near-zero improvement (gain) over a random cut. For the standard encoding, the unconditional classical MaxCut-Gain hardness gap implies that \emph{any uniformly efficient quantum or hybrid procedure recovering a fixed positive fraction of the optimal classical gain on every input, with at least inverse-polynomial success probability, would place} NP \emph{in} BQP. Such a procedure is therefore believed impossible under standard assumptions. We broadly address where our worst-case barriers do or do not apply across the quantum algorithm landscape. We prove that the barrier survives quantum random access optimization (QRAO) compression and applies between the classical and relaxed optimal values. For every input, a product state attains the classical optimum. Thus the barrier to reaching the classical threshold does not arise from a need for entanglement. For $d\in\{2,3\}$ variables per qubit, the known decoder transfers encoded energy gain to decoded mean gain by the exact factor $1/d^2$. Combining this identity with MaxCut-Gain hardness gives an operational preparation barrier for QRAO. We also construct hard $n$-qubit families with relative quantum relaxation excess $Θ(1/n)$, while the maximally mixed state has energy approximation ratio $1-Θ(1/n)$, zero encoded energy gain, and hence zero decoded mean gain. Our results separate the effects of relaxation tightness and energy approximation from operational accessibility, motivating more comprehensive accounting in benchmarking and performance assessment.

Abstract: Quantum circuit optimization is critical for mitigating the noise inherent in current quantum hardware. Quantum compilers typically sequentially apply multiple optimizations (also called ``optimization passes'') to improve the circuit. The impact of the order in which these passes are executed has yet been largely unexplored. This paper investigates the significance of the order of optimization passes within quantum circuit compilation, specifically analyzing interactions between different optimization methods and quantifying their mutual influences. Using Qiskit's compiler, we systematically evaluate pairwise combinations of 16 selected optimization passes, measuring circuit depth and gate count across various benchmark circuits. Our findings indicate dependencies between certain optimization passes, demonstrating that the order of the passes affects the optimization quality. In some cases, the worse performing sequence can be corrected through repeated pass application. %such that they are as good as the best performing one by extending the sequence. Experiments on multi-pass sequences show that more than two optimization passes may have an impact on each other but that this always links to the previously found pairwise effects. We observe that it is important to initially choose the best order of optimization passes to get the best possible optimization for the given circuit. The experiments reveal some factors which are important to choose the best, or at least a good, order; among those, the resulting optimization sequence depends the most on the native gate set.

Abstract: Supervised approaches to quantum error mitigation learn a map from noisy circuit outputs to ideal ones, and therefore require the ideal outputs. Producing those ideal outputs demands noiseless classical simulation, whose cost grows exponentially with system size, so supervision is unavailable in exactly the regime where mitigation matters most. We ask whether cheap, individually unreliable signals drawn from circuit structure and hardware calibration can take the place of ideal labels. We assemble sixteen heuristic labeling functions (stabilizer and parity constraints, relaxation and readout characteristics, local depth, gate counts, and neighboring activity), reconcile their disagreements with a probabilistic label model, and read the resulting per-qubit error probabilities as a readout channel whose inverse mitigates the measured distribution. No ideal output enters the training path. On $147{,}000$ five-qubit circuits executed on two IBM devices, the method removes $24.3\%$ (Algiers) and $28.8\%$ (Hanoi) of the Kullback-Leibler divergence to the ideal distribution, against $15.4\%$ and $21.5\%$ for the strongest published analytical baseline, a margin that holds on both devices and lies far outside its bootstrap interval. Supervised neural models trained on ideal distributions remain stronger where such labels exist, and we quantify that gap rather than setting it aside; the method's claim is to the regime where they do not, since the labels they require cannot be computed for the circuits mitigation is needed for. The codes will be released shortly.

Abstract: How much does the noisy measurement add to learned quantum error mitigation? An accuracy table cannot say, because a model handed circuit structure can score well without reading the measurement at all. QEMScore adds the comparison that can. Each simulated circuit carries an exact ideal answer. The learned mitigator is scored beside a capacity-matched control, a model just as flexible that reads the same circuit description but never the measurement. Each method's measurement spend is accounted and not equalized. We run a controlled campaign on simulated circuits and reanalyze two published learned mitigators, Q-LEAR and QRAFT, from their released hardware data. Three findings stand out. First, under familiar within-family conditions (S0) evaluated across two spin-chain families and three seeds, continuous couplings identify the target, and the control that never reads the measurement matches 87.7 to 100.5 percent of the mitigator's gain over an affine fit to the circuit description. A plain polynomial in the coupling parameters, fitted after the campaign, beats the mitigator on all six evaluations, reflecting the selected learners' capacity. Second, for these selected learners, matching most of the gain is not matching the accuracy: on five of six evaluations the mitigator removes 19.5 to 74.5 percent of the error the capacity-matched control leaves, a learner-specific gap rather than a measurement requirement. Third, on released hardware data where descriptors only partially identify queries, the findings differ: flexible models of the descriptors show negligible mean gain over affine fits in Q-LEAR, and measurement inputs carry predictive gains in both Q-LEAR and QRAFT. These comparisons reflect representation- and protocol-specific behavior rather than an isolated cross-regime difference. A learned mitigator's accuracy should therefore be reported beside such controls.

Abstract: Quantum computing hardware is advancing rapidly toward utility-scale machines that will enable scientific breakthroughs. Many teams are pursuing distinct and difficult-to-compare routes to this goal, using different qubit technologies and logical architectures. Tracking progress toward quantum utility therefore requires rigorous benchmarks that measure computational capability relative to utility-scale challenge problems and enable fair comparison across disparate platforms. Here we demonstrate direct, cross-platform measurement of quantum computational capability using a new benchmark that quantifies the size of the largest computationally relevant quantum circuits that a machine can execute successfully and the speed at which it can execute them. We apply this quantum universal operation performance system (QUOPS) experimentally to leading processors from Quantinuum, Google, and IBM, computing directly on physical qubits. Translating state-of-the-art resource requirements for recognized challenge problems that represent useful quantum computation into effective QUOPS circuit sizes shows that computational capability must grow by 5 orders of magnitude, motivating fault-tolerant approaches. We use the same benchmark to assess the performance of a simple fault-tolerant logical-qubit processor implemented on up to eight [[7,1,3]]-encoded logical qubits using Quantinuum Helios-1, and project the growth of capability across successive generations of fault-tolerant quantum computers to show how QUOPS can track progress toward quantum scientific utility.

Abstract: A quantum classifier assigns labels by evolving an input quantum state and measuring the output, so repeated executions reveal only a distribution over labels. We study certified adversarial robustness for such classifiers under known-readout query access (KRQA), where an evaluator can prepare inputs, knows the quantum measurement, and observes finite-shot outcomes but cannot inspect the internal evolution, parameters, or gradients. We give a measurement-only framework that returns two complementary guarantees for each input: a lower bound ruling out untargeted errors within a radius, and an attack-independent upper bound witnessing an adversarial state within a radius. Both are estimable from the known readout measurement and sampled outcomes, require no tomography or circuit description, and admit finite-sample guarantees. The upper bound uses gap operators induced by the quantum measurement; the lower bound relaxes state-space search to an efficient optimization over outcome distributions with operator-spectrum constraints, yielding certificates that are never weaker than prior probability-only certificates and can be strictly stronger when the spectral constraints are active. Evaluations on multiple quantum classifiers show that the lower bound tracks exact optima on tractable instances, while the upper bound remains informative when standard attacks fail. We further demonstrate real-device feasibility on IBM Quantum hardware: from 40 executions of two 8-qubit quantum neural networks, our method computes both certificates, with the expected ordering between the lower and upper bounds on every tested input. Taken together, these results show that robustness claims for quantum classifiers can be audited directly from observable statistics under KRQA.