quantum cryptography teams

Abstract: Local-unitary (LU) equivalence asks whether two quantum states differ only by independent changes of basis on their qubits. For graph states, whether this relation can be decided in polynomial time has remained open for over a decade. We give a deterministic algorithm that decides LU equivalence for graphs on $n$ labelled vertices in $\widetilde O(n^{6.38})$ bit operations and constructs exact single-qubit unitaries whenever the states are equivalent. Building on Claudet and Perdrix's quasipolynomial algorithm, we replace the enumeration of vertex subsets by a compact system of constraints generated from pairs and triples. The remaining graph transformation is found by solving linear equations over the binary field. These new steps cost $\widetilde O(n^5)$ bit operations; the inherited graph preprocessing sets the overall bound. We also count the local-Clifford (LC) classes of graph states within any LU class: their number is a power of two, computable within the same bound. For any given graph state, this decides whether single-qubit Clifford gates reach every graph state in its LU class, and supplies a counterexample when they do not. The method also decides LU equivalence of stabilizer codes encoding one logical qubit.

Abstract: A central question in the theory of quantum advantage is whether there are quantum advantage protocols with similar resource requirements as random circuit sampling that are also verifiable just from the classical outputs of the quantum computation. Here, we develop the idea of simulation secrets for verifiable advantage. A verifier can use a simulation secret to evaluate a cross-entropy test faster than it would take a classical adversary to pass the test. We instantiate this idea using IQP circuits described by cubic polynomials with planted independent spaces. These correspond to the largest independent set in the orbit of a polynomial under the general linear group and yield a low-rank stabilizer decomposition of the corresponding state. We conjecture that large independent spaces are invisible to a computationally bounded adversary, and therefore they cannot exploit them to pass the protocol. A second conjecture regards the fine-grained complexity of producing samples that pass the cross-entropy test for uniformly random polynomials. Under these conjectures, our scheme results in a polynomial gap between the verification time and the time a classical adversary would need to pass the protocol---both are exponential. It has a potential application to generating classically certifiable randomness, since the output distributions have high min-entropy. We estimate that the planted polynomial scheme is implementable using 100 logical qubits at logical error rates around $10^{-6}$.

Abstract: We establish unbounded two-use Holevo additivity gaps in finite dimensions. For each sufficiently large fixed integer $K$ and all sufficiently large $n$, we construct channels $T_n$ with output dimension $K^n$, input dimension $\exp(Θ_K(n^2))$, and \[ χ(T_n^{\otimes2})-2χ(T_n) \ge n\left[\frac{\log_2K}{K}-2\log_2(1+9/K)\right]-O(1/n). \] The gap is linear in output qubits, with an explicit quadratic input-qubit cost and an explicit threshold on $n$. We also obtain channels whose single-use Holevo quantity tends to zero while their two-use Holevo information, and hence classical capacity, diverges. The channels arise from structured tensor products of the complementary mixed-unitary channels used in Collins's free-probabilistic proof. We establish minimum-output-entropy gaps by combining Collins--Youn's product-group Haagerup inequality with Bordenave--Collins's quantitative strong-convergence estimates