Papers for

quantum cryptography developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

No dimension limit for systems used in squashed entanglement measures

No cardinality bound for squashed entanglement

Abstract: Squashed entanglement is an additive bipartite entanglement measure. For a state $ρ_{AB}$, it is defined as the infimum of all conditional mutual information $I(A:B\mid E)$ evaluated on extensions $ρ_{ABE}$. It was unresolved whether there is a bound on the dimension of the conditioning system, $E$, needed for this optimization. We show that no such cardinality bound is possible. Explicitly, we find that the squashed entanglement for a partially dephased Bell pair on two qubits cannot be achieved for any finite dimensional extension $E$. A crucial ingredient of this proof is a direct sum step, which in a sense, symmetrizes two purifying systems while keeping the conditional mutual information unchanged and the coherence no worse.

Sat 12 SeptInformation Theory
The gist
Squashed entanglement is a way to measure quantum connections between two systems using an extra helper system. People wondered if this helper system could always be chosen to have a limited size. The authors found that this is not possible: to get the exact measurement in some cases, the helper system must be infinitely large. They demonstrated this using a certain two-qubit quantum state and a special mathematical technique to keep the measurement unchanged while symmetrizing parts of the system.
Open 2609.14031v1

Quantum channels with zero privacy enable secure communication together

Private communication via zero-private-capacity quantum channels

Abstract: Private communication over a noisy quantum channel requires reliable transmission to the receiver and secrecy from the environment. Whether two channels with zero private capacity can jointly enable private communication is a longstanding open problem in quantum information theory. Here we resolve this problem by exhibiting a four-level channel and a qubit erasure channel with half erasure probability, each with zero private capacity, whose joint use achieves more than 0.0001903 private bits per product use. The encoding gives the receiver a linear information gain with at most quadratic environmental leakage, enabling privacy through a fixed joint measurement and classical coding. This superactivation, impossible for independent classical memoryless wiretap channels, shows that a channel's private capacity alone does not determine its value for secure communication. The initial activation example was identified through interactions with large language models, and the result has been formalized in Lean 4.

Wed 9 SeptInformation Theory
The gist
In quantum communication, some channels are considered useless for sending private messages. This paper shows that combining two such 'zero privacy' channels can actually allow private communication. The authors found a specific example where using these channels together enables sending secret bits, which was thought impossible before. This finding challenges previous ideas about how quantum channels provide security.
Open 2609.10520v1

Holevo barycenter does not multiply under combined quantum channels

Non-Multiplicativity of the Holevo Barycenter of Quantum Channels

Abstract: The Holevo barycenter of a quantum channel is the unique output state obtained as the average output of any ensemble achieving the Holevo capacity. Given two quantum channels, the multiplicativity problem asks whether this barycenter tensorizes under parallel composition, namely whether the barycenter of the product channel coincides with the tensor product of the individual barycenters. This question is closely related to the additivity problem for the Holevo capacity: additivity implies tensorization of the Holevo barycenter, while tensorization alone is not sufficient for additivity. Although a construction is known that demonstrates the existence of channels with non-additive Holevo capacity, their corresponding Holevo barycenters still tensorize, leaving open whether multiplicativity might ultimately hold universally. Here, we answer this question in the negative by exhibiting channels for which the Holevo barycenter is not multiplicative under the tensor product of the channel with itself. Moreover, we show that the entropy of the Holevo barycenter is neither universally subadditive nor universally superadditive under tensor product.

Tue 8 SeptInformation Theory
The gist
The Holevo barycenter is a way to describe the average output state from a quantum communication channel. People wondered whether combining two channels side-by-side would make their barycenters simply multiply or combine in a straightforward way. The authors show that this is not always true—the barycenter for the combined channel can be different from the product of the individual barycenters. They also find that the entropy of these barycenters does not reliably add up or break down in simple ways when channels are combined. This answers an open question about how quantum information capacity behaves when channels are used together.
Open 2609.09373v1