Papers for

quantum cloud operators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Information leakage controls privacy in multi-user quantum cloud systems

Coherence Rather Than Error Rate Governs Privacy in Multi-Tenant Quantum Computing

Abstract: Multi-tenant computing enables providers of commercial cloud quantum processors to rent disjoint sectors of a device to independent users. Average gate error, which cloud quantum computing providers report, does not determine how much one tenant learns about another. We propose an information-theoretic notion of information leakage across co-tenancy boundaries stemming from quantum state distinguishability. We measure this leakage on commercially-available 156-qubit (IBM Kingston) and 20-qubit (IQM Garnet) devices. Boundaries with identical benchmarked error can offer significantly different amount of information leakage because standard reported measures of error are blind to coherent-versus-stochastic nature of the error while the proposed notion of information leakage is not. A uniform Pauli randomisation implemented over the victim's whole register is used as a defence mechanism to reduce the information leakage to zero. The defence theoretically does not incur a fidelity cost, but the experiments show a non-trivial degradation caused by accumulation of errors. We provide a specific call-for-action to the providers of quantum cloud computing to report information leakage in addition to standard error rates in their device datasheet to enable users to compute privacy and security risks prior to engagement with the device.

Mon 28 SeptCryptography and Security
The gist
When multiple users share a quantum computer hosted in the cloud, they expect their computations to stay private. The usual way providers report errors in these devices doesn't show how much information one user might accidentally learn about another. The authors show that the type of errors, especially coherent errors, matter more for privacy than just the average error rate. They measured this leakage on real quantum devices and found it varies even for similar error rates. They also demonstrate a way to reduce this leakage by randomizing the victim user's quantum state, though this method can introduce other errors in practice.
Open → 2609.34411v1

Quantum reinforcement learning improves cost and delay in quantum cloud scheduling

Quantum Reinforcement Learning for Cost and Delay Tradeoffs in Quantum Cloud Orchestration

Abstract: Quantum cloud computing, delivered through the quantum-as-a-service (QaaS) model, provides access to quantum computing resources. However, applying uniform time-based pricing across fundamentally heterogeneous quantum resources significantly complicates task orchestration, particularly when addressing the tradeoff between execution costs and system performance. While heuristic methods rely on predefined scheduling rules, classical deep reinforcement learning (DRL) models may require more trainable parameters in this setting. Motivated by the potential of parameterised quantum circuits (PQCs) as compact function approximators, we propose QRLQ, a cost-delay-aware quantum cloud scheduling framework integrating PQCs with a dueling double deep Q-network (D3QN) to dynamically account for both cost and delay. Our simulation results show that QRLQ achieves lower mean cost and delay than the heuristic baselines, achieving a 5-11% lower mean cost relative to availability-based and rotation-based heuristics and reducing mean delay by 17% and 82% relative to the strongest and weakest heuristic baselines, respectively, while retaining execution fidelity within 2% of a fidelity-greedy policy. Compared with the classical DRL baseline, QRLQ achieves comparable scheduling performance while using 72% fewer trainable parameters. This work explores the feasibility of using QRL for task orchestration in quantum cloud environments and demonstrates its potential for cost-delay-aware quantum resource management.

Wed 23 SeptMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
The gist
Scheduling tasks on a quantum cloud is hard because different quantum computers vary in cost and speed, and standard pricing doesn’t fit well. The authors propose a new method combining quantum circuits with advanced AI techniques to balance cost and delay better than simple rule-based approaches. Their method uses fewer parameters but achieves similar or better performance, making it more efficient. This approach could help manage quantum cloud resources more effectively in the future.
Open → 2609.27446v1