quantitative trading teams

Abstract: Communication between agents has mostly been studied on tasks with a shared objective and fast, clear feedback. Trading has neither: each agent manages its own account, with decisions being scored by markets late and noisily. A trading swarm is thus a population of independent decision-makers rather than a team, for which convergence is a risk and not the goal. We ran 200 agents from four model families in groups of ten under five communication regimes, from isolation to message boards and shared notes, over seven US trading days (1 to 9 October 2026), logging everything each agent read before every decision. In two of the four families, communicating groups came to hold far more of the same stocks than the isolated group. A group's return was largely the return on what its members held in common. Seeing a post from a groupmate made an agent 7 percentage points more likely to reuse an eight-word phrase from it. Agents that started too close together to see each other's posts shared such a phrase in 14% of cases, the rate that common inputs produce. Seeing the post did not detectably change that morning's trades. Case studies traced the adoption of positions and decision rules over subsequent days, and communicating groups sold in step more often than isolated ones. Because isolated groups also converged on the same stocks, sometimes completely, assessments of herding need to measure excess convergence relative to a no-peer baseline.

Abstract: In modern financial markets, more than 3/4th of the large volume trade is executed by algorithmic trading based on advanced trading strategies to attain higher precision and speed than traditional human traders. The conventional strategies focused on price-based indicators are inadequate in capturing the market dynamism arising from real-world events such as social sentiments, political instability, or sudden economic shifts. With the rise of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) and data availability, there is a requirement for more efficient algorithms that can incorporate these external factors in trading strategies. DRL has shown potential in simulating real-world scenarios and in simplifying complex decision-making since DRL agents can automate the trading process i.e. executing trades in a manner comparable to human traders. They have shown reliable performance since they can update their policies based on risk and quantitative factors. In this paper, we propose a DRL approach based on partial and deep-infusion of sentimental analysis. It features distinct policy designs of actor-critic-based agents: only policy optimization (A2C & PPO) and policy optimization along with Q-learning principles (DDPG, TD3 & SAC). Our findings reveal, that the agents based on policy optimization combined with Q-learning, significantly and consistently demonstrate improved performance upon sentiment deep-infusion in profit maximization as well as risk-averse trading.

Abstract: Financial news can influence investment decisions long after publication. Timely news may reach an investor before prices fully adjust, whereas older news may already be reflected in prices. We examine two ways to handle aging signals: retain them and give a portfolio policy timing information, or filter them out before portfolio selection. A fixed large language model (LLM) extracts signals from public SEC disclosures. We compare these treatments in reinforcement learning (RL) policies and LLMs that choose portfolios directly. We evaluate returns after trading costs in historical tests over 2023-2025. RL choices respond to timing information in a controlled test, but historical returns show no consistent benefit from adding it. For the LLM, filtering old news produced the highest average net return, reaching 18.43% per year when news delivery was delayed by four weeks. This exceeded the returns of all RL strategies that used news.

Abstract: Quantitative research is an iterative loop: a researcher proposes a market hypothesis, implements it as an executable signal, tests it on historical data, and decides what to keep. Existing benchmarks score formulas, code, or individual trading decisions, leaving open whether large language models (LLMs) can complete this loop and produce strategies that work beyond the research period. We introduce Quant-Arena, a benchmark and public leaderboard for end-to-end quantitative research on real A-share market data. A model constructs features and stock-scoring code, receives feedback only on 2022--2023, and freezes one strategy for assessment on the sealed year 2024. A cash-account evaluator applies trading constraints and costs, including market impact estimated from a simulated order book. Scores are dominated by realized excess return and complemented by signal quality and the diversity of features used by the strategy. We evaluate nine frontier models, among which GPT-6 Astra scores highest; yet no model beats the equal-weight market in 2024. Quant-Arena is open to submissions from any model or agent harness.

Abstract: Formulaic alpha factor mining searches for symbolic expressions that transform market data into predictive signals. Recent LLM-based evolutionary factor mining methods use large language models as semantic variation operators. Under the conventional LLM-EA paradigm, stochastic variation and fitness-based selection can leave the search weakly directed and concentrated around a narrow set of structurally similar factors. We argue that these limitations arise because current methods mainly organize search at the individual and population levels, leaving lineage-level control underused. A lineage connects successive factor variants through evolutionary descent. We propose LineageEvo, which uses lineage in two coupled forms of search control: (1) lineage-conditioned LLM variation, which distills Lineage-Scoped Search Experience into operator-specific priors and fuses them with global operator priors, providing persistent, lineage-relevant guidance for LLM generation; and (2) lineage-stratified search allocation, which balances factor quality against lineage concentration by distributing the search budget across lineages during evolutionary search. Together, these mechanisms make semantic variation more direction aware and prevent branches from dominating the evolution, thereby promoting the discovery of predictive and diverse factors. We evaluate LineageEvo on CSI 500 and S&P 500 in terms of factor predictiveness, portfolio performance, search efficiency, and lineage- and expression-level diversity. LineageEvo achieves the strongest predictive performance on both markets, while LSPS produces a more balanced lineage distribution and a structurally broader factor pool. The results support lineage as a useful intermediate unit for controlling LLM-based evolutionary factor search.

Abstract: Realistic market impact is essential for generative limit order book (LOB) models to serve as world models for trading agents. If a simulator misprices this mechanism, agents learn policies that are optimal in the simulator but wrong in the real market. Existing metrics assess generated streams purely through distributional comparison with historical data, leaving counterfactual response to an agent's own orders largely unexplored. Here, we show that market impact emerges naturally in neural LOB generators trained solely for next-token prediction. We inject execution-style metaorders into the generated message flow of five autoregressive models across five NASDAQ stocks and measure the response using estimators from the empirical impact literature, validated on baselines whose physics is known in advance. Our benchmark evaluates any message-level generator in three phases: free generation (reading order-flow persistence against price diffusivity); metaorder injection (yielding the impact law's exponent and amplitude); and a post-execution window (measuring relaxation). In addition, comparing each visible injection to a blind, simulator-only control isolates the model's learned response from standard book mechanics. For every model on every stock, we measure how the impact responds as a function of cumulative metaorder participation. Interestingly, we observe emergent impact in generative models of market data, with exponents in the range of 0.63 to 1.21, slightly above the traditional 0.5 of the square-root law of impact. In the family of models tested, we are so far unable to observe impact decay during relaxation. We tentatively attribute this to the still-short context windows of the models. We release the benchmark as open source to validate future generative models for market data.

Abstract: While autoregressive foundation models trained on limit order book (LOB) data show state-of-the-art performance for market simulation, pre-training with cross-entropy neither penalizes the compounding of sampling errors over free-running rollouts nor targets desired market properties. We introduce a post-training method for LOB foundation models using a Wasserstein generative adversarial network (GAN) objective. A critic, trained online on rollouts through the true, non-differentiable matching engine, guides updates from evolution strategies over rank-4 LoRA perturbations of the pre-trained generator, under a KL trust region. For efficiency, we use EGGROLL (Evolution Guided GeneRal Optimisation via Low-rank Learning), a memory-efficient variant of evolution strategies. On a held-out panel, adversarial post-training improves LOB-Bench realism by 17.6% (WS-21) and 17.0% (Mean-$L_1$), while selection-matched random-perturbation and compute-matched continued-pre-training controls yield no improvement. Post-training is thus a necessary stage that more pre-training does not replace. Per-position divergence measurements show that it slows error accumulation over 500-message rollouts from $3.1\times$ to $2.3\times$. Adversarial post-training is also inexpensive, requiring under 50M training tokens and 12 GPU-hours per seed, three orders of magnitude below the 48B-token pre-training budget. Ablations over critic inputs, optimizers, and the population-rollout trade-off, together with an analysis of reward hacking, yield practical design guidelines for adversarial post-training.

Abstract: Modeling limit order book (LOB) dynamics is central to market forecasting and execution-strategy evaluation. While diffusion models achieve strong empirical performance, existing LOB snapshot models typically lack a learned recurrent encoder and formal statistical guarantees. We introduce LOBGrad, a conditional DDPM framework for probabilistic LOB forecasting that combines an autoregressive RNN encoder with a diffusion-based generator. In particular, we establish an excess-risk oracle inequality for the one-step DDPM noise-prediction objective under exponential mixing and regularity assumptions. We further show that, under contractive dynamics, the dependence on the conditioning-window length can be reduced to a dependence on the latent-state dimension. Experiments on BTC/USDT, GOOGL, and META show that LOBGrad improves on its encoder-free diffusion ablation across all reported queue metrics and obtains competitive results against other baselines. It also reproduces the key stylized facts of LOB microstructure, and yields reasonably calibrated queue-based predictive intervals. A stylized downstream task illustrates the potential value of the generated forecasts.

Abstract: Hosted LLMs enable automated alpha mining but incur recurring API costs and expose research context to external providers. Training a local generator requires supervision aligned with portfolio utility: a predictive factor may add little after redundancy and trading costs. This incremental value is assessed only after the factor program is complete, whereas generation proceeds sequentially. Deployment must also adapt to evolving stock-specific evidence and changes in factor effectiveness across market regimes. We propose AlphaLedger to address these challenges. Economic-context on-policy distillation (EC-OPD) conditions a frozen teacher on completed factors and their cost-adjusted marginal portfolio contributions, then distills its legal-action distributions along the student's own trajectories. The deployed generator requires neither teacher calls nor outcome inputs. EviPool constructs a dynamic stock universe from lagged multi-source evidence, while a regime-residual gate (RRG) reweights factors using matured, state-matched returns with shrinkage and bounded deviations from equal weighting. On Chinese A-shares, AlphaLedger achieves a 55.4\% annualized net return, a Sharpe ratio of 2.06, and a maximum drawdown of 10.8\%. In a common CSI500 universe, its annualized net return exceeds the strongest baseline by 43.6\% (31.6\% vs.\ 22.0\%), with a 13.5\% higher Sharpe ratio.

Abstract: We study the conditional distribution of limit-order volume submitted over the next five minutes, given the current order book and recent order flow. The task requires capturing price placement, total volume, and predictive uncertainty jointly. Coordinate-wise diffusion losses do not explicitly account for price displacement, while normalizing fields to unit mass removes information about total volume. Agreement on selected summary statistics also does not establish fidelity to the joint field distribution. We introduce OrderFlowDiT, a conditional Diffusion Transformer for unnormalized bid and ask volume-at-price fields, trained with an unbalanced optimal-transport (UOT) auxiliary loss. We also develop a full-field evaluation framework that combines a transport cost sensitive to price placement and total volume with proper scoring rules and calibration diagnostics. In the primary comparison on 1950 validation conditions across 30 U.S. equities, adding UOT reduces full-field transport cost by 45.8% and the transport energy score by 26.1% relative to training with mean squared error alone. Both measures improve for every stock. These findings support incorporating price geometry and volume into generative modeling, with field accuracy and predictive uncertainty evaluated together.

Abstract: Autoregressive transformers trained on limit order book (LOB) message streams are increasingly proposed as foundation models for market microstructure. Because the generative process of real markets is unknown, these models can be judged only by the realism of their output, leaving open what they actually learn. We make the question answerable by inverting the setup: we train GPT-style models on order flow from simulators whose latent parameters are known, so that the Bayes-optimal predictor, the generating state, and the exact data entropy serve as references. Measured against them, next-token pretraining on order flow implements amortized Bayesian inference over market regimes. The learned predictive matches the exact Bayes optimum to within a millinat per token and approaches the oracle floor even on a nonstationary family whose latent state drifts within an episode, a regime that requires filtering. The latent regime is linearly decodable from frozen activations, well above baselines, so a frozen-model read-out calibrates simulator parameters more accurately than windowed maximum likelihood at a fraction of the cost. In our experiments these capabilities are not produced by scale: capacity and token volume saturate early, and it is the diversity of training regimes, not the token count, that determines generalization to unseen markets. On real NASDAQ data, zero-shot transfer is set by how well the simulator prior covers real flow: an enriched mixture nearly closes the gap to an in-domain baseline, and pretraining beats from-scratch training at every budget across held-out tickers. Known ground truth turns average next-token loss, which is uninformative near the entropy floor, into an exact comparison against the Bayes-optimal and oracle predictors.

Abstract: Automated alpha factor discovery is critical for modern quantitative research. While large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been integrated into quantitative workflows, existing agent-based approaches remain highly susceptible to severe backtest overfitting. To address this challenge, we propose EvoQuantLab, a training-free, dual-loop self-evolving framework for robust factor discovery. Instead of relying entirely on LLM generation, EvoQuantLab deploys an inner genetic-programming (GP) loop that dramatically improves token efficiency while evolving typed factor expressions under structural and diversity constraints. An outer diagnosis loop then systematically audits evidence across cycles to drive protocol-level improvements. Furthermore, our evaluation pipeline applies multi-metric validation to rigorously filter out spurious factors before deployment. Extensive out-of-sample experiments across both daily and hourly frequencies -- covering equities and cryptocurrency -- demonstrate the robustness of EvoQuantLab. Specifically, on daily CSI 500 and S&P 500 tasks, EvoQuantLab achieves leading annualized returns of 18.34% and 21.30%, consistently outperforming existing agent baselines. On high-turnover hourly cryptocurrency data, EvoQuantLab delivers a 37.91% annualized return while effectively avoiding execution collapse.

Abstract: Market making under realistic order-flow dynamics is challenging due to the clustered, self-exciting nature of order arrivals, which are naturally modeled by non-Markovian Hawkes processes. We propose a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) framework for market making with general Hawkes order-flow dynamics. We first establish non-asymptotic performance bounds that quantify the loss incurred by approximating the infinite-dimensional Hawkes state using a finite collection of exponentially weighted features. Guided by this analysis, we introduce the Hawkes-Structured Network (HSN), a novel neural architecture that encodes historical order flow through a learnable mixture-of-exponentials filter. HSN is trained end-to-end using model-free RL, jointly optimizing the feature representation and quoting policy directly from reward feedback. Experiments on single- and multi-asset market-making problems with mixture-of-exponentials, power-law, and regime-switching kernels demonstrate that HSN outperforms general-purpose neural architectures, achieving higher trading rewards while implicitly recovering the underlying order-flow intensities.

Abstract: Test-time adaptation (TTA) enables time series forecasters to update after deployment as new observations become available. However, adaptation objectives that focus primarily on prediction errors at individual time steps do not fully address the needs of financial time series forecasting. In addition to pointwise return fitting, return direction and the price trajectories reconstructed from sequences of returns are also important. To better account for these properties, we introduce Direction- and Price-Aware Adaptation Loss (DPAL), which combines pointwise return fitting with directional and price-calibration terms. We apply DPAL within existing TSF-TTA frameworks without modifying the source forecaster or the adapter architecture. Across a diverse collection of financial datasets, DPAL reduces reconstructed-price mean squared error in most evaluated settings.

Abstract: As option markets grow and AI advances, agentic systems for option trading are gaining increasing attention. Language-model-based agents can reason over contextual information such as news, but option trading presents a particularly challenging decision problem: a single stock can have thousands of contracts, and the agent must decide both which contracts to trade and how to combine them. Existing approaches often sidestep this complexity by restricting the policy to a fixed strategy structure, such as a straddle, limiting their ability to switch strategies as market conditions change. We present SOTA (Stock Options Trading Agents), an agentic trading framework for structured option-strategy selection. SOTA abstracts the large option universe into strategy-level decisions while deterministic resolvers handle portfolio implementation. We develop SOTA by post-training Qwen3.8-27B with supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning. SOTA is evaluated on options on nine large-cap U.S. equities and SPY against rule-based and machine-learning strategy selectors in the same trading environment. Over a six-month out-of-sample period, SOTA earns an 18.3% total return with a Sharpe ratio of 1.60 and a maximum drawdown of 8.96%. We also document an asymmetric role of news: news improves frontier-teacher trajectories, but retaining news during reinforcement learning reduces out-of-sample return from 18.3% to -2.7%.

Abstract: Short-horizon realized volatility forecasting requires the integration of market information that evolves at incompatible temporal resolutions, from second-level order book dynamics to weekly regime drift. Our conference work introduced HAN-T, a hierarchical architecture in which scale-specific Transformer encoders process short, mid, and long-horizon streams and a learned attention fuser weighs their contributions. This article replaces the quadratic attention encoders with selective state space (Mamba) encoders while retaining attention only in the fuser, where the input is a three-token set rather than a long sequence. The resulting hybrid, HAN-Mamba, summarizes each stream through a recurrent state whose input-dependent gating matches two structural properties of volatility: persistent but decaying memory and abrupt regime shifts. On the Optiver Realized Volatility Prediction benchmark under time-aware five-fold cross-validation, HAN-Mamba improves mean RMSPE over HAN-T (0.1942 vs. 0.1965) with 33% fewer parameters. Its linear-time encoders further allow the high-frequency context to be extended from 60 to 240 buckets, reducing error to 0.1927 where the attention variant saturates, and support constant-time streaming updates at inference. Ablations attribute the gains to the encoder swap, confirm that the hierarchical prior transfers across sequence-model families, and show that the permutation-invariant attention fuser remains the correct mechanism for cross-scale integration.

Abstract: Reality may establish that an outcome occurred without identifying which evolving procedure produced it or why. This distinction matters in production ML systems whose code, configuration, and artifacts change while external feedback accumulates. We examine it in a human-directed, agent-engineered quantitative trading system, using oracle to mean an external source of realized outcomes rather than a complete correctness specification. Across one year, the account gained and outperformed a broad market index, while annual alpha was not statistically distinguishable from zero under the main retrospective specification. Retrospectively selected subperiods include adverse relative performance and conditional candidate-level weakness under declared approximate references. Engineering records document changes during the episode, and complete recommendation-to-runtime binding is unavailable. The archive does not establish a common frozen instance or a unique cause. The case motivates an outcome--diagnosis gap: outcome evidence, evaluated-object identity, and causal explanation support distinct claims. We distinguish frozen instances, pre-specified adaptive procedures, and ad-hoc development; organize archive-relative claim identifiability and an evidence hierarchy; and propose a prospective production-binding protocol. An illustrative compatible-history example shows how factual binding can resolve a recommendation's referent without supplying its counterfactual effect. The protocol is proposed rather than prospectively validated. External feedback constrains outcome claims, while provenance and additional identification structure determine the resolution of diagnosis.

Abstract: Accurate forecasting models are usually large, expensive to update online, and fixed in architecture once trained. We apply ONE-NAS, an online neuroevolutionary architecture search that evolves a population of small recurrent networks as each window of data arrives, to daily cross-sectional stock return prediction, and pilot it on a host and endpoint pipeline: the host runs the search and ships each generation's champion genomes over TCP/IP to a Raspberry Pi 4B, which predicts online. On the Pi a single champion predicts a 50-stock window in 24.6~ms and the ensemble of 40 island champions in 556~ms, far inside the daily decision cycle. On four panels of US mid-cap equities over 2022--2024, reading the population as a rank-mean ensemble of island champions returns $+27.5\%$ net of realised transaction costs, against $+11.3$ to $+14.8\%$ for online LSTM, online GRU and monthly-retrained LSTM baselines and $+4.5\%$ for the single best genome used in prior ONE-NAS work.

Abstract: Time series forecasting models are typically compared on pointwise error, which scores a prediction in isolation from the decision it is produced for, and a lower forecast error does not imply a better decision downstream. A parallel debate asks whether modern transformer architectures forecast better than recurrent and other lightweight models. We compare linear, fixed recurrent, transformer, and mixing based architectures against recurrent networks evolved by neuroevolutionary architecture search, evaluating each on forecast accuracy and on the net return of a daily long/short strategy. All models are fit on a pooled panel, one network trained across the whole universe. Across four mid-cap portfolios and three trading years, the evolved networks rank first on both forecast accuracy and net trading performance, while the second most accurate model loses money once positions are formed and costs are charged. The advantage tracks a horizon match, since rank IC for the evolved networks rises from a one-day to a ten-day scoring horizon while every model above 300 parameters declines. They are also the cheapest end to end: a CPU-only search of 16 minutes yields 66-weight networks that predict in 10.8~$μ$s on a Raspberry Pi Zero, against transformer baselines of up to 817,153 parameters that require GPU training.

Abstract: Deep hedging learns trading policies from historical or simulated market trajectories, yet under nonstationarity these training paths may not represent future market conditions. We propose WRAP (Wasserstein-Reweighting Adversarial Perturbation), a drift-aware adversarial training framework derived from a two-budget distributionally robust optimization (DRO) formulation. The formulation is anchored to a weighted empirical reference distribution whose fixed baseline weights are chosen to balance sampling uncertainty against temporal drift. Around this reference distribution, the ambiguity set addresses two complementary forms of distributional misspecification by allowing an adversary to reweight the observed trajectories subject to a $φ$-divergence constraint and perturb their paths subject to an optimal-transport (OT) constraint. We derive a joint first-order expansion in which the leading-order increase over the nominal expected loss decomposes into a reweighting contribution determined by the dispersion of hedging losses across trajectories and a transport contribution determined by the sensitivity of the loss to path perturbations. This expansion yields an explicit finite-dimensional adversarial attack that replaces the distributional inner supremum with a tractable first-order approximation. Across stationary and nonstationary Heston dynamics and a generalized affine diffusion (GAD), the experiments show complementary benefits from reweighting and transport, with joint adversarial training providing the largest gains under nonstationarity.

Abstract: Backtests of LLM trading agents often assume that every order fills at the closing price. We ask whether this choice changes only reported returns or also the order of the agents. Five prompted LLM signal policies and seven classical baselines trade the same synthetic price paths under six execution settings, from near-ideal fills to latency, spread, participation, and impact stresses. The main experiment contains $2{,}462$ runs with matched decision frequencies and paired market paths. On the compressed two-asset board, agreement between the near-ideal and default-stress rankings falls to Kendall $τ_b=0.21$ in the high-volatility regime, compared with $0.82$ in the calm regime. The seed-bootstrap intervals, $[0.00,0.52]$ and $[0.48,0.94]$, are wide and overlap. On a fixed 11-policy board, agreement rises from 0.24 with two assets to 0.85 with ten; the two-asset point estimate differs substantially from the wider settings we tested. Rank changes are related to turnover, and comparisons with buy-and-hold also depend on how that anchor is initialized. The experiment does not compare LLM trading skill. It shows that, on a short horizon, an execution convention can become part of the benchmark's headline. Execution assumptions and rank stability should be reported alongside returns.

Abstract: Quantitative trading strategy design aims to discover trading programs from historical data that remain effective in future markets, which can be viewed as a black-box program optimization problem. LLM-based textual gradients offer a promising approach by providing explicit optimization directions for iterative strategy refinement. However, directly applying textual gradients faces two challenges: (1) optimization is myopic, underutilizing experience from previous evaluations; and (2) aggregate backtest feedback overlooks temporal robustness, potentially favoring strategies that perform well only in specific market periods. To address these challenges, we propose TradeGrad, an experience-guided textual-gradient framework for robust trading strategy optimization. TradeGrad leverages accumulated optimization experience to estimate textual gradients and employs multi-scale revisions for both strategy exploration and refinement. It further introduces the Cross-Period Robust Objective (CPRO), which emphasizes performance in unfavorable historical periods to promote temporal robustness. Experiments on cross-sectional and time-series strategy design in Chinese A-share and U.S. equity markets show that TradeGrad achieves the best in-sample and out-of-sample performance across all four settings. Notably, its Chinese cross-sectional strategy achieves 27.99% annualized return, 12.19% maximum drawdown, and a Sharpe ratio of 1.63, approximately 68% higher than the CSI 300 benchmark. Further analyses validate the proposed components and show consistent improvements in both in-sample and out-of-sample performance throughout optimization. The code is available at https://github.com/transcend-0/TradeGrad.

Abstract: Large language models are moving from producing trading signals to writing the code that executes them. The failure mode of the second role is silent: generated code runs, a backtest plots, yet the risk logic that the trader described is not the logic being executed. Existing code benchmarks test functional correctness on unit tests and finance benchmarks test forecasting; neither measures whether an implementation behaves like the strategy that was asked for. We introduce MintEval, a benchmark in which reference strategies are generated programmatically from a library of composable building blocks, back-translated into colloquial trader instructions, and re-implemented by the model under test. Generated and reference programs are executed bar by bar on identical market data and frictions, and compared on their actions rather than on code similarity or profit: alpha is differenced away. MintEval v0 contains 800 tasks on BTCUSDT 15-minute data, stratified by an execution-measured state-span complexity tau that is decoupled from description length. Low-cost models reach a mean ActionMatch of at most 0.544 and reproduce at most 0.087 of tasks exactly; on a stratified subset of 200 tasks a frontier model (Claude Opus 5.5) reaches 0.889 and reproduces 0.575 exactly, yet still fails silently on 0.275 of tasks. Given a menu of building blocks, models identify the strategy almost perfectly, yet 79.2% of the implementations whose specification was read correctly diverge on more than 10% of active bars. The LLM judge of a recent strategy-generation benchmark, applied verbatim, accepts every one of these silent failures.

Abstract: Hybrid statistical-neural pipelines often assume that a successful statistical first stage leaves a cleaner and more learnable residual target. We examine that assumption in short-horizon volatility forecasting through a signal-forecast-system diagnostic framework. Across five liquid U.S. assets, a volatility-aligned HAR-style model outperforms AR, MA, and ARIMA. Within expanding training windows, the pre-standardization fitted residual process used to construct residual-LSTM sequences has about 82% lower variance than the corresponding target and near-zero lag-1 autocorrelation; independently, rolling pseudo-out-of-sample HAR errors show about 74% variance reduction and similarly weak lag-1 dependence. Residual-only LSTM augmentation nevertheless raises mean squared error from 0.3049 to 0.3594 on average, with deterioration on every asset. Pure LSTM records the lowest selected pseudo-out-of-sample MSE, 0.2649, while the residual hybrid requires substantially more end-to-end runtime without improving accuracy. We describe this pattern as forecaster-preconditioner asymmetry: first-stage forecasting success and statistical residual simplification need not translate into useful downstream neural preconditioning.

Abstract: Short-horizon price-trend prediction from limit order books in equity and intraday electricity markets requires models that combine predictive quality with low single-sample latency and a small serialized model size to keep pace with rapid and continuous market updates. We introduce MBOFormer, a 7,203-parameter causal transformer, and MBOFusion, a 14,371-parameter extension with a slow temporal-context branch. Both models process market-by-order (level-3) histories of individual order submissions, cancellations, and executions. We compare them with level-2-based baselines that process sampled order-book snapshots and simple statistics instead of their underlying messages. Across three markets and four prediction horizons, our models achieve the highest mean macro-F1 in eleven of the twelve settings in a comparison against other benchmark models of varying sizes. Both our models achieve sub-millisecond median inference on a single Apple M2 CPU thread and have serialized state dictionaries below 70 kB. MBOFormer is 5.1x-8.1x faster than the million-parameter baselines at comparable predictive quality. Our results show that fine-grained market event history can reduce the need for model size under tight deployment constraints for short-term equity and electricity price forecasting tasks.

Abstract: Reinforcement learning for trading often struggles to balance upside participation with drawdown control. Profit-only policies can collapse toward passive long exposure on upward-drifting assets, while aggressively risk-penalized rewards can become too defensive during volatile periods. This paper proposes PPO-HRAP, a hybrid regime-aware policy that combines Proximal Policy Optimization with an interpretable regime prior. The agent observes both market features and portfolio-state variables, receives a reward combining portfolio log return, VIX-conditioned drawdown-increase penalty, target-exposure deviation, and turnover cost, and executes a blended action between the PPO actor output and a regime-derived target exposure. On the held-out 2020-2022 SPY test window, PPO-HRAP achieves 27.62% total return, 8.48% annualized return, 0.6447 Sharpe ratio, 0.8588 Sortino ratio, and 0.4592 Calmar ratio, while reducing maximum drawdown from 34.10% for Buy and Hold to 18.47%. Across five SPY seeds, PPO-HRAP remains stable with mean total return $0.2725 \pm 0.0109$ and mean Sharpe ratio $0.6219 \pm 0.0565$. Single-run cross-asset tests on QQQ and DIA further show that the proposed method ranks first on total return and Sharpe ratio for all three reported assets. These results suggest that blending learned actions with a volatility-aware regime prior is a practical way to improve risk-adjusted trading behavior, although the current policy still incurs high turnover and cross-asset robustness beyond SPY remains limited to single-run evidence.

Abstract: In this paper, we extend earlier findings of supra-competitive outcomes in optimal-execution games by identifying a learned punitive mechanism that deters deviations and provides behavioural evidence of collusion. We investigate this mechanism in a two-player, finite-horizon Almgren-Chriss liquidation game. Independent proximal policy optimisation agents with access to within-episode price and action histories achieve costs below the Nash benchmark. We identify a profitable deviation by training against the mean learned liquidation schedule, then impose its first trade on one of the original agents. The opponent responds by accelerating liquidation. This response more than offsets the deviator's gain in every run and both player roles, while leaving the punisher's average payoff materially unchanged relative to not punishing under the same deviation. The punisher imposes greater losses on the deviator while preserving its own average payoff, despite the availability of more profitable, less punitive liquidation plans. Matching deviations and subsequent additional selling rise and later decline during training, while final policies retain an effective punitive response. We formalise two checks: whether punishment outweighs the gain from deviating, and whether the change in trading behaviour is large enough to account for the loss imposed. Both checks hold for the tested deviation. Together, these findings provide behavioural and economic evidence supporting a collusive interpretation of the learned supra-competitive outcomes.

Abstract: Large language models are strong general-purpose code generators, but executable algorithmic trading remains a demanding specialization target: a model must translate a natural-language strategy specification into correct program logic for a specialized trading framework, execute on historical data, produce trades, and remain semantically faithful to the request. We study two complementary mechanisms for specializing language models for this setting: continued pretraining on algorithmic-trading framework code and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on agent-validated request-to-code pairs. Evaluation is centered on QuantCode-Bench, our 400-task benchmark for Backtrader strategy generation, together with a repository-level SWE-bench-like track. Continued pretraining improves single-turn Judge Pass from 41.5% to 47.5% for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and from 27.8% to 33.0% for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. SFT applied after continued pretraining yields a larger gain for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, reaching 58.2% Judge Pass and 83.5% successful backtests; in agentic evaluation it raises first-turn success from 22.3% to 58.3% and final success after up to 10 turns from 47.5% to 79.5%. Continued pretraining alone improves first-turn agentic success but lowers final success after repair from 47.5% to 32.5%, consistent with degraded instruction following, whereas SFT improves both. We also identify a capability-retention failure: domain specialization degrades parser-conformant structured tool calling, and targeted recovery SFT restores tool-call formatting but not the base checkpoint's repository-level agent performance. The results show that framework-oriented pretraining, validated SFT, and explicit capability-retention evaluation address distinct failure modes in domain-specific executable code generation.

Abstract: Post-training has been shown to significantly improve language models' performance on tasks with verifiable outcomes, including mathematical reasoning, software engineering, and computer use. However, whether the same approach can improve forecasting in financial markets is much less clear. Compared with tasks with verifiable outcomes, not only are realized returns noisy, but even what constitutes a relevant information set for making effective predictions is not obvious a priori: the model must decide which observations to gather and then commit to a numerical judgment before the outcome is known. We study this question in a chronological stock-price sandbox, where a language model gathers price, volume, relative-performance, and market-context evidence and predicts a future return. We post-train Qwen3-4B with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on tool-use demonstrations, then proximal policy optimization (PPO) with a terminal reward given by the forecast score against the realized return. The resulting AURA-4B more than doubles the starting direction--magnitude score, from 20.94 to 43.31, and is comparable to frontier language models on this benchmark. Conditional magnitude agreement rises from 33.3 to 66.2, while directional accuracy changes from 62.9 to 65.4. SFT expands tool use, and PPO further increases the share of ranking and market-context queries. These results show that post-training can substantially improve financial forecasting performance, together with changes in how the model investigates the market, on this outcome-selected benchmark.

Abstract: Cover's Universal Portfolio (Cover, 1991) matches the performance of the best constant rebalanced portfolio in hindsight. We generalize this framework to compete with an arbitrary comparator sequence $\mathbf{u}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{u}_T$, leading to a dynamic regret minimization problem for the log loss where existing methods break down due to potentially unbounded gradients. The log loss is exp-concave, a curvature property that classically yields fast rates for static regret, yet we show that this advantage generally disappears in the dynamic setting. In particular, a linear-loss-type $\sqrt{TP_T}$ dependence is unavoidable, where $P_T=\sum_{t=2}^T\lVert\mathbf{u}_t-\mathbf{u}_{t-1}\rVert_1$ is the standard path length. This limitation stems from the coarse nature of $P_T$, which obscures finer spatial and temporal structure of the comparator sequence. We therefore introduce two structure-aware measures---the Jensen-Shannon distance for spatial structure and the JS$^q$-path length for temporal structure---under which faster rates are attainable when the comparator sequence has favorable structure. To achieve sharp bounds for both measures simultaneously, we develop Universal Dynamic Portfolio, a parameter-free method that combines a new Dirichlet Hedge algorithm with a fixed-share update, while retaining a near-optimal $P_T$ guarantee in the worst case. Finally, under an additional bounded-gradient assumption, we show that OPS admits the faster $T^{1/3}P_T^{2/3}$ dynamic regret rate over all comparator sequences. We attain this rate with a tractable proper algorithm that applies more broadly to general online exp-concave optimization over arbitrary compact convex domains.

Abstract: Financial candlestick forecasting is fundamental to quantitative investment, yet it remains exceptionally challenging due to extremely low signal-to-noise ratios and vast heterogeneity across markets and instruments. Existing approaches have largely attempted to introduce deep learning to capture hidden temporal features, but most adopt an auto-regressive formulation, which leads to error accumulation during inference. Meanwhile, general-purpose time-series foundation models are not tailored to the unique structure of k-line data and yield unsatisfactory performance on downstream candlestick forecasting tasks. To tackle these problems, we introduce KiT, a K-line Diffusion Transformer foundation model, and reformulate future prediction as conditional path generation via flow matching: given a historical context window, the model generates an ensemble of plausible future OHLCV trajectories. We pre-train KiT at multiple parameter scales on billions of candlestick bars spanning multiple markets and timescales. Across three markets and seven resolutions, KiT attains a mean return RankIC of 0.057 and a mean volatility RankIC of 0.66, leading at every timescale and outperforming both task-specific financial forecasters and general time-series foundation models. Code will be available at: https://github.com/Luciferbobo/KiT.

Abstract: Formulaic alpha discovery is a core challenge in quantitative trading, as identifying alphas that work well together remains difficult. Recent reinforcement learning (RL) methods formulate this task as a Markov decision process (MDP), but two important issues remain unresolved. First, as the alpha pool evolves, the reward function changes accordingly, making the MDP inherently non-stationary. Second, most existing methods optimize a single objective, typically predictive power, while ignoring other important properties of a high-quality alpha pool. Motivated by these challenges, we propose AlphaPareto, an RL method for formulaic alpha discovery. To address non-stationarity, AlphaPareto augments the state to include both the alpha under construction and the current alpha pool, and applies a large language model (LLM) to encode the pool. This design allows the agent to adapt to the evolving search environment. To overcome the limitation of single-objective reward design, AlphaPareto replaces the scalar reward with a multi-objective vector-valued reward that simultaneously captures predictive power, temporal stability, perturbation robustness, and diversity, and optimizes these objectives through a Pareto-regularized learning procedure. Empirical applications to real-world datasets show that our AlphaPareto method outperforms its competitors.

Abstract: Equity-relevant news evolves through temporally dependent corporate events, making historical information useful only when event continuity, information availability, and transition reliability are modeled. Existing LLM-based financial agents incorporate historical evidence, yet they provide limited support for preserving issuer-specific chronology under point-in-time constraints and for identifying when historical transitions contribute information beyond the current forecast. We present RICE-Alpha (Reliability-Informed Correction with Event Graphs), a point-in-time stock-scoring framework that separates a history-aware multi-view Base Alpha from a reliability-calibrated residual correction derived from historical event continuation. A Multi-Tier Memory Layer grounds news interpretation in temporally eligible issuer-specific history, while a Typed Event Agent constructs event states whose successor relations are formed within issuers and pooled across firms only after valid local pairing. Matured transitions are calibrated by their empirical reliability, and the resulting graph signal is residualized against the Base Alpha and technical view to obtain the RICE Delta. On daily Nasdaq-100 and Hang Seng Index panels from 2024 to 2026, RICE-Alpha achieves the strongest results among the evaluated LLM-based agents and momentum across four predictive and four portfolio-level metrics. Its ICIR more than doubles that of the strongest baseline, while net Sharpe ratios reach 1.656 and 1.725 in the U.S. and Hong Kong, respectively. U.S. ablations further show significant reductions in IC and RankIC after Holm adjustment when major components are removed. These results indicate that historical event continuation adds incremental information when it is temporally grounded, reliability-calibrated, and introduced as a residual correction to a multi-view forecast.

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown promise in financial decision-making, yet existing evaluations focus on equity trading and primarily assess directional prediction, overlooking the structural complexity of derivative markets. Option trading introduces fundamentally different challenges, including nonlinear payoffs and multi-leg strategy construction, requiring structured decisions rather than simple directional bets. We introduce LiveOption, an evaluation framework for LLM-based agents in option trading. LiveOption formulates the problem as structured sequential decision-making under realistic execution and capital constraints, and provides a reproducible environment with standardized interaction protocols. The framework includes three task suites covering portfolio overlays, event-driven earnings trading, and 0DTE intraday trading. We further propose a hierarchical metric suite that evaluates action validity, decision quality, risk characteristics, and outcome-level performance. Experiments show that current agents often fail to achieve competitive returns in most scenarios. LiveOption offers a principled testbed for evaluating structured decision-making beyond outcome-based metrics.

Abstract: Consistently profitable trading is difficult because equity markets are noisy, non-stationary, and only partially predictable from historical data. We benchmark five deep reinforcement learning (DRL) actor-critic methods: A2C, PPO, DDPG, TD3, and SAC, that learn trading actions end-to-end from market states, and compare them with a supervised price-forecasting baseline. Using daily data for 20 large-capitalization S&P 500 stocks from 2000 to 2020, enriched with trend-following technical indicators and log min-max scaling, we train on 2000-2018 and backtest on 2019-2020. Each agent is evaluated both when trained once and under forward retraining, in which it is retrained on all data available before each successive test window. DDPG achieves the highest annual return (55.5%), Sharpe ratio (1.38), and alpha (0.22), but also the highest market beta (1.24). TD3 and SAC offer a better risk-return balance, with Sharpe ratios of 1.37 and 1.33 and maximum drawdowns of about 25%. Forward retraining improves A2C, PPO, and SAC, leaves TD3 essentially unchanged, and reduces DDPG's annual return from 55.5% to 29.8%, consistent with TD3's greater robustness to hyperparameters. The forecasting baseline has the smallest maximum drawdown (9.6%) and the lowest beta (0.31), underscoring a trade-off between the higher returns of end-to-end DRL and the lower risk of forecast-driven strategies.

Abstract: Forecasting short-horizon mid-price movements from limit order book (LOB) data is central to algorithmic trading, yet most deep LOB forecasters are point predictors: they output a direction or a displacement, but never indicate which of their forecasts can be trusted. We introduce UQ-LOB, a lightweight, encoder-agnostic uncertainty quantification module that attaches to any pretrained LOB encoder and, in the spirit of attentive neural processes, conditions each forecast on a context set of recently completed windows whose outcomes are already realised. The UQ-regression variant outputs a calibrated Gaussian over the future tick displacement, while the UQ-classification variant outputs a categorical distribution over down/up/stationary. Both expose a scalar confidence (predicted signal-to-noise ratio or class probability) that supports selective prediction. On 5.2 billion LOB events across seven cryptocurrency assets and horizons of 5, 10 and 15 seconds, UQ-regression attains near-nominal 68% interval coverage, and restricting to the most confident 10% of predictions raises directional macro F1 by 0.11-0.15 for UQ-regression and 0.05-0.11 for UQ-classification, at every horizon. On large, economically meaningful moves, the tightest confidence tier reaches a directional F1 of 0.88 (down) and 0.83 (up) at the 5-second horizon.

Abstract: Large language models increasingly generate quantitative trading strategies, yet existing benchmarks assume standardized assets, numerical features, or directly compilable strategy representations---assumptions that prediction-market strategies violate, since a coarse idea may leave the traded outcome, causal information source, signal definition, threshold, sizing, order policy, exit, and settlement behavior unspecified. We introduce \textsc{AlphaOpsBench}, which evaluates end-to-end operationalization from source-grounded economic hypotheses to auditable executable programs over 581 source-preserving strategy records and a lifecycle-scale Polymarket dataset with 1.28 million binary markets, 183.6 million cleaned executions, settlement evidence, and limit-order-book history, comparing Direct generation against a Staged design-then-code protocol. In a corrected independent-generation study over 36 controlled tasks and 24 preregistered real strategies, strict end-to-end validity remains rare: Direct and Staged obtain 35/180 and 20/180 canonical passes on the controlled cohort and no confirmed pass on the real cohort, and repeated generations vary substantially in model-owned economic choices. By contrast, 775,725 of 783,655 scheduled historical replays complete, showing that replayability is a far weaker property than source-faithful operationalization. Financial outcomes depend on the declared execution model and available historical evidence, and fee and liquidity experiments show that execution costs alter subsequent trading paths rather than acting only as ex-post deductions. \textsc{AlphaOpsBench} thus separates strategy fidelity, behavioral validity, historical executability, and financial performance in an evidence-aware benchmark for LLM-based quantitative research in prediction markets.

Abstract: Language-model agents now run the whole of quantitative factor research: they propose investment factors, backtest them, select the survivors and retire them. We ask which of those jobs an agent should keep. Our answer is governed self-evolution: the agent may propose, and a frozen statistical referee that the agent cannot touch must judge. The referee scores each candidate only on market outcomes revealed after submission, by betting, so its false-discovery guarantee holds at every stopping time for any proposal policy. We cross three proposers (a script, a bandit and a language model) with this referee and with three deliberately leaky ones, in a synthetic world with planted truth, a probe-authoring environment and a ten-year walk-forward on the CSI 500. Who judges sets the number of false admissions: the frozen referee admits 5-11 times fewer sub-threshold factors than the leaky referees under a scripted proposer, and no proposer closes that gap. Who proposes sets the yield: the language model beats the script, matches the bandit, and adds the one capability a bandit lacks, writing its own diagnostic probes. The certificate's price is time: an admitted true factor waits about 500 trading days, and the certified portfolio's Sharpe ratio therefore trails an ungated one. Judging belongs to the procedure; proposing and instrument-making belong to the agent.

Abstract: Volatility forecasts play a central role in financial risk management because their overall level and day-to-day movements affect downstream decisions. Most studies compare forecasting models while keeping the training loss fixed. Yet losses emphasise different errors and can target different properties of future volatility, so raw comparisons may combine persistent forecast-level differences with differences in daily forecast movements. This leaves unresolved whether the importance of loss choice comes mainly from the forecast level it targets or from differences that remain after level adjustment. We address this gap through a comparison of seven losses and five models across major cryptocurrencies. Validation-based alignment adjusts the forecast level before the raw and aligned forecasts are evaluated using statistical scores and one-day Value-at-Risk. Before alignment, marginal score variation is greater across losses. After alignment, model choice becomes the larger source of variation in the full five-model comparison, while cross-loss differences in VaR breach rates narrow substantially. Our contribution is a comprehensive evaluation of loss and model choice that shows why losses can appear so influential in raw comparisons and how this interpretation changes when forecast level and downstream risk are considered explicitly.

Abstract: Stock price forecasting is a long-standing challenge in computational finance, driven by the inherent randomness of markets and complex temporal patterns. While recent deep-learning models have raised forecasting accuracy by jointly modeling inter-stock and temporal price dynamics, they conflate inter-stock relationships with intra-stock temporal dependencies and focus solely on the univariate objective of price movement. To address these limitations, we propose LiMT, a Hierarchical Multi-Task Learning framework that integrates liquidity-aware signals for stock price forecasting. LiMT employs a Market Regime Encoder (MRE) module that first extracts contemporaneous cross-stock dependencies, then models each stock's temporal dynamics, yielding a unified latent state. Building on this latent state, we introduce a Liquidity-Driven Learning (LDL) module, a mixture-of-experts architecture that features cross-task gating mechanisms to jointly predict price movement, volatility, and trading volume. We further design an Adaptive Portfolio Optimization (APO) mechanism that converts multi-task forecasts into executable portfolio weights under transaction-cost and liquidity constraints. Extensive experiments on the CSI300 and CSI500 benchmarks show that LiMT performs best among strong neural and tree-based baselines across the reported metrics. In realistic CSI300 backtests, APO improves annualized return from 3.99% to 10.01% and Sharpe ratio from 1.22 to 1.86 over equal weighting, showing that the multi-task forecasts translate into deployable portfolio gains.

Abstract: Market-making strategies in real limit order book markets face substantial model uncertainty and regime-shift risk. Existing adversarial reinforcement learning approaches improve robustness by formulating the Avellaneda--Stoikov market-making problem as a zero-sum game between a market maker and an environmental adversary. However, these approaches typically rely on Poisson order arrivals and neglect trade-induced price impact, limiting their ability to capture important high-frequency market microstructure effects such as clustered order flow, self-excitation, and post-trade price feedback. We extend adversarial reinforcement learning for market making to a more complex environment with Hawkes self-exciting order arrivals and trade-induced price impact. To mitigate the increased non-stationarity introduced by the expanded regime space, we incorporate an LSTM module that explicitly models the temporal structure of recent observations. We further characterize the equilibrium properties of the proposed framework through both game-theoretic analysis and numerical experiments, and introduce a robustness evaluation protocol focused on improvements in the left tail of the return distribution. Experimental results across a range of market regimes show that the proposed method achieves improved left-tail performance in most complex microstructure environments. In particular, the gains are pronounced in regimes with strong Hawkes excitation and low-to-moderate price impact. Bootstrap tests provide no evidence that these improvements are obtained through a stronger terminal directional inventory bias. These results suggest that combining adversarial training with temporal state representation can improve the robustness of reinforcement-learning-based market-making strategies under order-flow self-excitation, price impact, and regime uncertainty.

Abstract: Mean-variance portfolio optimization (MVO) is a central framework in data-driven asset management. A widely adopted approach is a two-stage framework that first predicts expected returns and then solves the optimization problem based on these predictions, with the predictive models trained by minimizing prediction errors. However, this objective of prediction is not aligned with the quality of the downstream portfolio decision. Decision-focused learning (DFL), which directly minimizes the downstream decision loss within the learning process, has thus emerged as a promising direction. However, existing DFL approaches to MVO rely on surrogate losses or constraint relaxations for tractability, creating a structural mismatch between predictive model training and the constrained MVO solved at evaluation. We propose a single-level optimization formulation that incorporates the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions of the lower-level MVO into the upper-level learning problem. This formulation explicitly preserves the budget and short-sale constraints while remaining tractable for standard nonlinear optimization solvers. Rolling-window experiments on real-world ETF (Exchange Traded Funds) data across two asset universes with different correlation structures show that our method achieved the best performance on multiple investment metrics and also demonstrated performance improvement due to the proposed regularization.

Abstract: Reinforcement learning trading systems published in the academic literature overwhelmingly rely on price-aggregate state representations (OHLCV bars) or limit-order-book depth features, leaving microstructure pattern theories from the practitioner literature, namely Auction Market Theory and Market Profile, without a peer-reviewed computational instantiation. We present ViperQ, a reinforcement learning system whose state representation is built explicitly from Auction Market Theory primitives: Volume Point of Control, Value Area position, Low Volume Node flags, Cumulative Volume Delta divergence, and tape-velocity signatures, assembled into a 20-dimensional Z-normalised vector. Two Proximal Policy Optimisation agents are trained with a prospect theory-grounded asymmetric reward function that penalises losing holds at a magnitude consistent with Kahneman and Tversky's loss-aversion coefficient. Evaluated on a held-out twelve-month partition of institutional tick data the agents have never seen, ViperQ achieves +163.6% ROI on TSLA (-27.5% max drawdown, 27,019 trades) and +116.5% ROI on NVDA (-47.8% max drawdown, 12,892 trades) under zero leverage. The results establish Auction Market Theory features as a tractable structured input modality for sequential decision-making on financial time series and motivate further work on microstructure-aware policy learning.

Abstract: Accurate prediction of equity returns remains a major challenge in computational finance due to the non-stationary, nonlinear, and low signal-to-noise ratio nature of financial time series. This paper proposes a hybrid two-stage architecture that combines a long short-term memory (LSTM) network with an XGBoost gradient-boosted regressor for multi-horizon stock return prediction across a diversified panel of 14 U.S. equities spanning six industry sectors. The LSTM component, comprising two stacked layers with 64 hidden units, processes 60-day sliding windows of five sequential market features to produce 64-dimensional temporal embeddings that encode learned sequential market dynamics. These embeddings are concatenated with 14 hand-crafted technical indicators to form a 78-dimensional hybrid feature vector, which is subsequently passed to an XGBoost regressor tuned via 3-fold cross-validation grid search. The framework is trained on a multi-stock pooled corpus using strict chronological splits and per-stock MinMaxScaling to prevent look-ahead bias, and evaluated across four prediction horizons of 30, 90, 252, and 365 trading days. Experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid model achieves a test RMSE of 0.0949 on the 30-day horizon, roughly one-third that of the standalone LSTM baseline, while marginally matching or surpassing the XGBoost-Only baseline across the majority of stocks. Directional accuracy rises with horizon length, reaching 97.6% at 365 days; we show, however, that this largely tracks the high base rate of positive long-horizon returns in the sample, and we therefore benchmark directional accuracy against a naive always-positive predictor and treat the above-base-rate gap at short horizons as the more informative signal. A composite investment scoring framework derived from multi-horizon predictions is further proposed to support portfolio ranking and decision support.

Abstract: An optimal reference may recommend trading when a learned policy chooses inaction, but the recommendation depends on information and future decisions. We introduce a four-stage audit for frozen proximal policy optimization policies without retraining. It examines deployment occupancy, matches current information, tests isolated deviations under incumbent continuation, and evaluates repeated deployment of observation-based alternatives. In controlled linear-Gaussian simulations, information matching explains part of the disagreement, while continuation changes its interpretation. At unit observation noise, incumbent continuation reverses 99.3% of projected-hard missed-advantage mass; repeated projected-rule deployment improves all 50 policies. These comparisons distinguish isolated action changes from policy replacement. Historical Bitcoin/Tether (BTCUSDT) replay applies this deployment perspective to a hand-specified intervention selected using 2024 data and frozen for 2025. Daily net reward improves by 135.03 basis points, with gains in 46 of 50 policies, primarily through lower turnover costs. The audit clarifies what oracle-flagged inaction implies for deployed decision making.

Abstract: Cryptocurrency forecasting presents a distinctive combination of extreme cross-asset scale heterogeneity, non-stationary dynamics, and structural dependencies among Open, High, Low, and Close (OHLC) variables. We present CryptoL, a unified framework designed to address these challenges within multivariate time-series forecasting. CryptoL evaluates forecasting error in context-normalized coordinates within the RevIN pipeline, preventing inverse normalization from introducing an additional squared-scale weighting into the MSE objective. We formally characterize this effect through the empirical risk and parameter-gradient geometry, establishing the conditions under which large-scale assets can disproportionately influence shared-model optimization. Beyond loss-space normalization, CryptoL examines channel-independent and channel-dependent normalization for OHLC data, showing that a shared channel-dependent affine transformation preserves candle-order relations that independent channel transformations need not preserve. The framework further incorporates scale-adaptive numerical stabilization to reduce distortions caused by a fixed normalization constant across assets spanning many orders of magnitude, together with a soft feasibility loss that penalizes violations of the defining OHLC inequalities. Experiments across heterogeneous cryptocurrency assets evaluate these components through controlled ablations and demonstrate improvements in forecasting accuracy, training stability, and the frequency of financially valid OHLC predictions relative to the considered baselines. CryptoL therefore provides an integrated approach to scale-balanced optimization, structure-preserving normalization, numerical stabilization, and constraint-aware cryptocurrency forecasting.

Abstract: Automated alpha factor discovery searches symbolic trading signals from price-volume panels and order-book data under a fixed evaluation budget. Existing single- and multi-agent program-search systems can overfit predictive proxies that fail after execution costs and repeatedly explore redundant factor families, limiting execution robustness and behavioral diversity. We introduce GoAnt, a quality-diversity multi-agent search framework that combines non-communicating Explorer, Exploiter and Connector workers with a shared adaptive Mental Map and a compact Queen dispatcher. The Mental Map organizes candidates by leakage-free execution profiles and retains one elite per niche, while the Queen reallocates the evaluation budget from explicit search-state summaries. We also define a map-independent effective-yield protocol that counts high-quality, mutually nonredundant factors directly from each method's evaluation records, giving archive-based and map-free systems the same ruler. On real A-share microstructure data spanning 2023--2026, GoAnt reaches quality-weighted yields of 41.8 and 47.6 in price-volume and order-book settings, improving the strongest baseline by 57% and 97% under matched budgets. Its locked populations retain 0.64 and 0.67 of in-sample quality out of sample, compared with 0.61 and 0.63 for a static map.

Abstract: Cross-sectional return prediction from raw intraday bars is sensitive to each instrument price level, an additive nuisance under a return-ranking hypothesis. We test whether removing this offset, rather than rescaling amplitudes or changing the encoder, explains gains on a point-in-time CSI 300 five-minute panel. Eight parameter-matched encoders are evaluated with and without RevIN normalization; a parameter-free ladder then separates identity, scale-only, centering, last-value referencing, differencing, and standardization across all fields and restricted channels. Centering drives the reliable effect, while scale-only normalization does not help. All eight paired effects are positive and survive Holm correction on raw rank IC, after style residualization, and after additionally residualizing on short-term reversal. Among six stronger encoders, normalized IC is 0.0830-0.0939 and gains are 0.0376-0.0567. Price-only standardization retains 93-101% of the all-field gain. These results place the main effect in transformed price-channel offset removal rather than amplitude scaling or encoder choice.