Papers for

quantitative trading teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Hybrid lstm and xgboost improve multi-horizon stock return forecasts

A Hybrid LSTM-XGBoost Framework for Multi-Horizon Stock Return Prediction Across Diversified Equity Portfolios

Abstract: Accurate prediction of equity returns remains a major challenge in computational finance due to the non-stationary, nonlinear, and low signal-to-noise ratio nature of financial time series. This paper proposes a hybrid two-stage architecture that combines a long short-term memory (LSTM) network with an XGBoost gradient-boosted regressor for multi-horizon stock return prediction across a diversified panel of 14 U.S. equities spanning six industry sectors. The LSTM component, comprising two stacked layers with 64 hidden units, processes 60-day sliding windows of five sequential market features to produce 64-dimensional temporal embeddings that encode learned sequential market dynamics. These embeddings are concatenated with 14 hand-crafted technical indicators to form a 78-dimensional hybrid feature vector, which is subsequently passed to an XGBoost regressor tuned via 3-fold cross-validation grid search. The framework is trained on a multi-stock pooled corpus using strict chronological splits and per-stock MinMaxScaling to prevent look-ahead bias, and evaluated across four prediction horizons of 30, 90, 252, and 365 trading days. Experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid model achieves a test RMSE of 0.0949 on the 30-day horizon, roughly one-third that of the standalone LSTM baseline, while marginally matching or surpassing the XGBoost-Only baseline across the majority of stocks. Directional accuracy rises with horizon length, reaching 97.6% at 365 days; we show, however, that this largely tracks the high base rate of positive long-horizon returns in the sample, and we therefore benchmark directional accuracy against a naive always-positive predictor and treat the above-base-rate gap at short horizons as the more informative signal. A composite investment scoring framework derived from multi-horizon predictions is further proposed to support portfolio ranking and decision support.

Fri 11 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Predicting stock returns is difficult because financial data is complex and often noisy. The authors combined two types of machine learning models: one that learns patterns over time (LSTM) and one that makes strong predictions from many features (XGBoost). This hybrid approach was tested on 14 different stocks over multiple time frames and showed better accuracy than using either model alone in many cases. They also made a simple scoring system to help rank stocks for investment decisions.
Open 2609.13125v1

Audit method clarifies when not trading is a mistake

When Is Inaction a Mistake? Continuation-Aware Auditing of PPO Trading Policies

Abstract: An optimal reference may recommend trading when a learned policy chooses inaction, but the recommendation depends on information and future decisions. We introduce a four-stage audit for frozen proximal policy optimization policies without retraining. It examines deployment occupancy, matches current information, tests isolated deviations under incumbent continuation, and evaluates repeated deployment of observation-based alternatives. In controlled linear-Gaussian simulations, information matching explains part of the disagreement, while continuation changes its interpretation. At unit observation noise, incumbent continuation reverses 99.3% of projected-hard missed-advantage mass; repeated projected-rule deployment improves all 50 policies. These comparisons distinguish isolated action changes from policy replacement. Historical Bitcoin/Tether (BTCUSDT) replay applies this deployment perspective to a hand-specified intervention selected using 2024 data and frozen for 2025. Daily net reward improves by 135.03 basis points, with gains in 46 of 50 policies, primarily through lower turnover costs. The audit clarifies what oracle-flagged inaction implies for deployed decision making.

Fri 11 SeptComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Sometimes a trading strategy learned by a computer decides not to trade, but another ideal choice might have suggested trading. The authors created a way to check these situations without training new strategies. Their audit looks at whether the decision to stay put matches the current information and what would happen if the decision changed. They tested this on simulated data and real Bitcoin trading history, showing that adjusting certain decisions can make trading more profitable by reducing costs.
Open 2609.12536v1

Cryptol improves cryptocurrency price forecasting with scale and structure fixes

CryptoL: Towards Scale Dominance and Physics Constraints Mitigation in Financial Multivariate Time Series Forecasting

Abstract: Cryptocurrency forecasting presents a distinctive combination of extreme cross-asset scale heterogeneity, non-stationary dynamics, and structural dependencies among Open, High, Low, and Close (OHLC) variables. We present CryptoL, a unified framework designed to address these challenges within multivariate time-series forecasting. CryptoL evaluates forecasting error in context-normalized coordinates within the RevIN pipeline, preventing inverse normalization from introducing an additional squared-scale weighting into the MSE objective. We formally characterize this effect through the empirical risk and parameter-gradient geometry, establishing the conditions under which large-scale assets can disproportionately influence shared-model optimization. Beyond loss-space normalization, CryptoL examines channel-independent and channel-dependent normalization for OHLC data, showing that a shared channel-dependent affine transformation preserves candle-order relations that independent channel transformations need not preserve. The framework further incorporates scale-adaptive numerical stabilization to reduce distortions caused by a fixed normalization constant across assets spanning many orders of magnitude, together with a soft feasibility loss that penalizes violations of the defining OHLC inequalities. Experiments across heterogeneous cryptocurrency assets evaluate these components through controlled ablations and demonstrate improvements in forecasting accuracy, training stability, and the frequency of financially valid OHLC predictions relative to the considered baselines. CryptoL therefore provides an integrated approach to scale-balanced optimization, structure-preserving normalization, numerical stabilization, and constraint-aware cryptocurrency forecasting.

Thu 10 SeptArtificial IntelligenceComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceMachine Learning
The gist
Predicting cryptocurrency prices is hard because different coins vary greatly in size, and the price data points are linked in special ways. The authors created CryptoL, a method that adjusts the data and error calculations to treat each coin fairly and keep important price relationships intact. They also added checks to keep predictions realistic and stable across many different coins. Tests show CryptoL is more accurate and reliable than some other approaches.
Open 2609.11206v1

GoAnt improves trading signals with diverse multi-agent search

GoAnt: Quality-Diversity Multi-Agent Search for Alpha Factor Discovery in Market Microstructure Data

Abstract: Automated alpha factor discovery searches symbolic trading signals from price-volume panels and order-book data under a fixed evaluation budget. Existing single- and multi-agent program-search systems can overfit predictive proxies that fail after execution costs and repeatedly explore redundant factor families, limiting execution robustness and behavioral diversity. We introduce GoAnt, a quality-diversity multi-agent search framework that combines non-communicating Explorer, Exploiter and Connector workers with a shared adaptive Mental Map and a compact Queen dispatcher. The Mental Map organizes candidates by leakage-free execution profiles and retains one elite per niche, while the Queen reallocates the evaluation budget from explicit search-state summaries. We also define a map-independent effective-yield protocol that counts high-quality, mutually nonredundant factors directly from each method's evaluation records, giving archive-based and map-free systems the same ruler. On real A-share microstructure data spanning 2023--2026, GoAnt reaches quality-weighted yields of 41.8 and 47.6 in price-volume and order-book settings, improving the strongest baseline by 57% and 97% under matched budgets. Its locked populations retain 0.64 and 0.67 of in-sample quality out of sample, compared with 0.61 and 0.63 for a static map.

Tue 8 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Finding strong trading signals from complex market data is tough because many techniques end up repeating similar ideas or fail when trading costs are included. The authors created GoAnt, a method that uses different types of agents working independently but sharing information to find diverse, high-quality trading signals. GoAnt organizes and remembers the best signals in a smart way to avoid duplicates and focuses its efforts efficiently. Tested on real Chinese market data from 2023 to 2026, GoAnt delivered significantly better results than previous methods.
Open 2609.08719v1

Centering price data improves predicting stock returns from intraday bars

Centering Drives Normalization Gains: Price-Offset Nuisances in Cross-Sectional Return Prediction

Abstract: Cross-sectional return prediction from raw intraday bars is sensitive to each instrument price level, an additive nuisance under a return-ranking hypothesis. We test whether removing this offset, rather than rescaling amplitudes or changing the encoder, explains gains on a point-in-time CSI 300 five-minute panel. Eight parameter-matched encoders are evaluated with and without RevIN normalization; a parameter-free ladder then separates identity, scale-only, centering, last-value referencing, differencing, and standardization across all fields and restricted channels. Centering drives the reliable effect, while scale-only normalization does not help. All eight paired effects are positive and survive Holm correction on raw rank IC, after style residualization, and after additionally residualizing on short-term reversal. Among six stronger encoders, normalized IC is 0.0830-0.0939 and gains are 0.0376-0.0567. Price-only standardization retains 93-101% of the all-field gain. These results place the main effect in transformed price-channel offset removal rather than amplitude scaling or encoder choice.

Mon 7 SeptComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Predicting how stock prices will move during the day is tricky because the price level of each stock can confuse the models. The authors found that simply removing the average price from the data, called centering, makes prediction models work better. Changing how much the data is scaled or using different model types did not help as much. This means that focusing on removing price offsets is key for better stock return predictions using detailed price data.
Open 2609.07122v1