Papers for

qa system builders

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

New method reveals multimodal benchmark item weaknesses

Are Multimodal Benchmarks Really Useful? Item-Level Multimodal Benchmark Diagnosis via Structure-Response Co-Calibration

Abstract: Multimodal benchmarks are central to evaluating whether models can reason over information from multiple modalities. However, existing literature has revealed that some benchmarks may contain shortcut items that can be answered from a single modality or from answer-option regularities alone, thus failing to reflect models' true cross-modal inference ability. Existing methods for assessing benchmarks typically rely either on intrinsic item structure or extrinsic model response behavior, which are not adequate for a comprehensive diagnosis. To fill in this gap, we propose SRCoD, a structure-response co-calibrated diagnosis framework for item-level diagnosis of modality dependence in multimodal benchmarks. SRCoD estimates sample-wise multimodal information structure from benchmark content and target answers, and uses this signal as a soft structural anchor for modality-conditioned item response modeling. The learned model produces a calibrated item-level diagnostic profile that reflects how strongly an item depends on different forms of modality evidence, enabling fine-grained benchmark analysis beyond aggregate accuracy. SRCoD also provides interpretable attribution of the diagnosis results. Extensive experiments under two complementary protocols, i.e., benchmark-refinement oriented validation and human-labeled item validation, demonstrate that SRCoD outperforms state-of-the-art benchmark diagnosis methods.

Sat 10 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Multimodal benchmarks test if computer models can understand information from different sources like images and text together. But sometimes, these tests have questions that can be answered using only one source, making the test less useful. The authors created a new method called SRCoD that looks at both the test content and model responses to check how much each question really depends on multiple sources. This method helps spot weak questions and better understand how well models truly combine different types of information.
Open → 2610.14542v1

Bridge improves retrieval and language model cooperation for better question answering

BRIDGE: Bilevel Retrieval-Credit-Aware Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (ARL) with verifiable rewards improves the ability of large language models (LLMs) to tackle knowledge-intensive tasks by learning to interleave search and reasoning. However, most existing ARL methods optimize only LLM-generated tokens and treat retrieved evidence as environment observations. This creates an information-credit gap: failures caused by missing or misleading evidence are attributed to the LLM policy rather than to the retriever, which motivates training the LLM and the retriever jointly. In this paper, we show that retrieval and LLM policy learning are order-sensitive: adapting the retriever before optimizing the policy yields a larger reward gain than the reverse order. To preserve this hierarchy while allowing both components to co-adapt, we formulate retrieval-augmented agentic RL as a bilevel optimization problem. To solve it efficiently, we introduce BRIDGE, a memory-efficient first-order bilevel method motivated by a loss-landscape analysis of the RL and retrieval objectives. Across seven open-domain QA benchmarks, BRIDGE achieves the highest average accuracy with both 3B and 7B backbones, improving the multi-hop average over the strongest baseline by 9.6 and 3.4 EM points, respectively. It also achieves the best averaged answer accuracy and reasoning quality across medical QA benchmarks.

Tue 29 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Answering tough questions often means a computer needs to search for information and then think carefully about it. The authors found that training the search part and the thinking part together works better if the search part is improved first. They created BRIDGE, a method that helps the search and thinking parts learn from each other more efficiently. This method made computers better at answering complicated questions across many tests, especially when the answers need multiple steps or when dealing with medical questions.
Open → 2609.36505v1