Papers for

public transit planners

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Autoencoder signals do not outperform classic methods detecting bus delays and anomalies

Detecting bus delays and service anomalies in Niterói with autoencoder latent feature representations

Abstract: Bus riders judge service by two failures: single trips that run late, and days on which the whole system misbehaves. We ask whether one unsupervised representation of raw GPS telemetry can serve both diagnoses on the NetMob 2026 Niterói bus dataset. An autoencoder compresses each trip into a 64-dimensional latent vector; the frozen encoder feeds supervised delay classifiers, and the reconstruction error serves as an anomaly score. Two findings are negative. First, the latent representation does not improve delay detection: gradient boosting on per-trip summary features reaches $0.846 \pm 0.013$ ROC-AUC against $0.838 \pm 0.016$ for the best latent setup, and the gap becomes significant once the preprocessing filters are relaxed. Second, two of the three external checks of the anomaly score were circular. Retraining without rainfall removes the rain association ($5.4\%$ against $5.0\%$ flagged, $p = 0.84$) and an apparent citywide disruption on 23 March. What survives is a day-level signal stable across three autoencoders (Spearman $ρ\geq 0.96$), driven mostly by day type, with degraded-telemetry days still separable within weekday and weekend strata. The alarm threshold limits detection more than the score does: a pooled percentile cut flags $5.7\%$ of trips on the worst degraded day, while re-scaling within each bus line flags $29.3\%$. The delay model rests almost entirely on one feature, no latent dimension is individually interpretable, and 22 chronic line-directions carry half of all delayed trips.

Mon 26 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Bus passengers care about trips that are late or days when bus service is generally bad. The authors studied if a type of AI model called an autoencoder, which compresses raw bus GPS data, could detect both late trips and problem days. They found that the autoencoder didn’t do better than traditional methods at spotting delays and that some signals it gave about days with issues were misleading. However, the model did consistently pick up some general day-level patterns, mostly related to the type of day and quality of GPS signals.
Open → 2610.35710v1

RideBench benchmark reveals challenges in ride-hailing demand forecasting

RideBench: A Large-Scale Exogenous-Aware Benchmark for Ride-Hailing Time Series Forecasting

Abstract: We release Ride-Hailing, a large-scale ride-hailing time series dataset synthesized from DiDi's marketplace data across 200 spatial areas. Ride-Hailing spans four consecutive years at half-hourly granularity and covers three representative exogenous scenarios: Weather Disturbance, Holiday Effect, and Large-scale Event Impact. Built upon Ride-Hailing, we introduce RideBench, a comprehensive benchmark for exogenous-aware ride-hailing forecasting, covering both regular week-ahead forecasting and long-horizon 8-week-ahead forecasting with up to 2,688 prediction steps. RideBench evaluates over 30 representative forecasting methods, including endogenous-only models, exogenous-aware models, and time series foundation models. Our results show that future-known exogenous variables provide clear benefits in regular week-ahead forecasting, especially under weather, holiday, and large-scale event (e.g., major sporting events and concerts) scenarios. However, current exogenous-aware models still struggle to fully capture disturbance-induced pattern changes under complex external contexts. For long-horizon forecasting, existing models cannot simultaneously achieve low pointwise errors, accurate broad trends, and reliable near-term forecasts. These findings reveal a clear mismatch between existing forecasting models and real-world ride-hailing requirements, highlighting the need for models that can better exploit future-known exogenous information, scale across heterogeneous areas, and support long-horizon planning. By introducing Ride-Hailing and RideBench, we aim to encourage the community to study these practical challenges in real-world ride-hailing forecasting.

Thu 8 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Predicting how many ride-hailing rides people will request is hard because many outside factors like weather, holidays, or big events affect demand. The authors created Ride-Hailing, a large dataset showing ride requests every half hour over four years and covering these important outside influences. They then built RideBench, a test platform that checks how well different forecasting methods handle these outside factors and make predictions for both short and long periods ahead. Their tests show that while having future information like weather helps predictions, current methods still struggle to handle complex changes and long-term forecasts well. This reveals there is room for better tools to improve ride-hailing predictions in real-world situations.
Open → 2610.11164v1