Papers for

public transit operators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

LightGBM models forecast border crossing queues for better staffing decisions

Multi-Horizon Explainable Queue Forecasting and Resource-Aware Decision Support for Intelligent Border Control Using LightGBM

Abstract: Border crossing points are stochastic service systems in which traffic demand, traveler categories, registration status, inspection requirements, staffing, and lane availability interact on multiple time scales. This paper extends an earlier multimodal queue-management framework by introducing an implementation-oriented, multi-horizon forecasting and decision-support architecture based on Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) models. In contrast to a single forecasting block, the proposed approach constructs horizon-specific regressors for 15, 30, 60, and 120 min forecasts and jointly estimates future waiting time and queue lengths. The models operate on temporally lagged traffic, service, density, and queue features, while an operational layer incorporates lane compatibility, officer availability, possibly degraded resources, traveler category, preregistration information, and human-approval constraints. Quantile LightGBM models provide 95\% prediction intervals for waiting-time forecasts. Beyond prediction, the framework produces machine-readable recommendations, alerts, aggregate key performance indicators, confidence information, and integration outputs suitable for border resource-management and decision-support systems. The results establish a reproducible synthetic-data baseline and a practical interface for subsequent validation with operational border-crossing data.

Sun 11 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Border crossings can have unpredictable wait times because many factors like traveler types and staffing change over time. The authors created a system that uses a machine learning method called LightGBM to predict wait times and queue lengths at different future points, such as 15 or 120 minutes ahead. Their models use past traffic and staffing data, estimate uncertainty, and add rules about lane and officer availability. This helps border control make better decisions about resource use and alerts. The system was tested on synthetic data to provide a baseline for real-world use.
Open → 2610.15930v1

Language models tested for navigating metro kiosks and fare calculations

MetroLLM-Bench: Evaluating Language Models as Transit Kiosk Runtimes

Abstract: We introduce MetroLLM-Bench, a 955-case benchmark for testing language models as the policy layer of a transit kiosk. It covers six real metro systems, ranging from 37 to 414 stations, and eleven categories that include routing, fare calculation, disruptions, accessibility, and adversarial input. In each case, the model must call structured tools and submit a machine-renderable terminal state containing an outcome, a per-ticket fare quote when applicable, and a kiosk action. Fourteen deterministic scoring components form Tier 1; eight semantic-quality components form Tier 2, six of which use a language-model judge. We report Tier 1 and the combined score of both tiers. A stratified 75/25 split reserves 717 cases for training-data generation and 238 for held-out evaluation. We evaluate twenty-six models from six vendors, of which twenty-three are ranked. On the held-out partition, a 4B Qwen 3.5 student trained through parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) exceeds both GPT-5.6 tiers on Tier 1 (91.3 against 90.6 and 90.0) and matches GPT-5.4 full at maximum reasoning effort (91.4), with a 2.6 GB Q4_K_M footprint. Larger 9B and 27B students provide no further Tier 1 improvement over the 4B student at this training scale. Across the four Qwen sizes, the PEFT gain over the corresponding base model decreases from +7.03 points at 2B (three training seeds) to -0.91 at 27B; every seed shows the same direction at every size. A deterministic rule-based baseline reaches 84.6 on Tier 1, with the remaining language-model advantage concentrated in policy adaptation, compound scenarios, accessibility, and temporal reasoning. Muse Glimmer 30B leads the composite ranking, and serving configuration alone moves the Qwen 3.5-to-3.8 comparison by 2.7 Tier 1 points. The benchmark, harness, reproduction guide, and fine-tuned students are released at https://github.com/continker/metrollm-bench.

Wed 9 SeptMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputation and Language
The gist
This paper introduces MetroLLM-Bench, a big set of tests to see how well language models can run transit kiosks, answering questions like the best route, fare prices, and handling delays. The benchmark uses real metro systems with many stations and different challenge types, including tough or tricky inputs. The authors tested 26 language models and found a smaller fine-tuned model performed as well as larger ones for certain tasks. They released the benchmark and tools so others can build better transit AI assistants.
Open → 2609.10016v1

Cities map where people travel using only crowd counts

Inferring Urban Mobility Interactions from Aggregated Dynamics

Abstract: Real-time urban governance depends not only on knowing where people are, but on how they move between places, directional flows that could be conventionally resolved by tracking individuals through space, i.e., expensive to sustain and built on traces that are highly unique and readily re-identifiable. Here we show that this directional structure need not be observed to be known: aggregated counts which cities already collect retain enough information to reconstruct the temporal evolution of origin-destination (OD) matrix. Using an uncertainty-aware physics-informed framework, we infer future OD flows from area-level counts alone across twelve mobility datasets from cities in the United States and China, reaching accuracy comparable to models that take historical OD matrices as input. Probabilistic modeling corrects the systematic underestimation of sparse, high-value corridors and yields calibrated predictions consistent with observed flows. Architectures that respect the generation-before-assignment logic of transport planning recover interactions more faithfully, indicating that location-level spatial heterogeneity should be preserved before pairwise interactions are reconstructed. Because inference requires only aggregated observations after training, recovering interactions this way reduces reliance on continuous individual-level tracking, pointing toward a more deployable and less exposure-heavy basis for real-time urban intelligence.

Mon 7 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Knowing how people move between different parts of a city helps manage urban life better, but tracking individuals is expensive and raises privacy concerns. The authors show that just counting how many people are in various areas over time is enough to guess these movements accurately. They developed a smart method that predicts where people will go next without needing detailed individual tracking. This method works well on real data from cities in the US and China and could help cities monitor movement in real-time while protecting privacy.
Open → 2609.07349v1