Papers for

public sector it teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Information flow modeling improves role-based AI Act compliance assessments

Transparent Information Flow Modeling for Role-Aware AI Act Assessment

Abstract: The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act introduces a structured framework for governing high-risk AI systems, emphasizing transparency, risk management, and role-specific accountability. However, current assessment practices often rely on monolithic system views or disconnected checklists, limiting their ability to capture the socio-technical complexity of real-world deployments. We explore the use of the Information Flow Methodology (IFM), a modeling-based approach to AI Act compliance assessment. IFM represents decision systems -- whether algorithmic, human, or hybrid -- as networks of information sites and transformation channels, enabling structured analysis of how information, decisions, and responsibilities flow across organizational and technical boundaries. We apply IFM in a real-world case involving a recruitment support tool used by a public-sector organization, evaluating both the Provider's system and the Deployer's recruitment process. Our results demonstrate that IFM can serve as a scaffold to bridge both component-based and holistic perspectives, and how technical systems are situated within socio-technical contexts. In doing so, IFM supports transparency, identifies risk pathways, and enables alignment analysis between intended and actual use. We argue that such modeling provides a foundational tool for effective, context-sensitive AI governance and accountability -- offering capabilities beyond conventional checklist-based assessments.

Mon 12 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
The European Union's AI Act aims to control risky AI systems by ensuring transparency and clear responsibilities. The authors show that by modeling how information and decisions move through both AI and people, they can better understand and assess the risk and accountability of AI in real workplaces. They tested this approach on a real recruitment tool used by a government agency and found it helps reveal where information risks may hide and whether the system is used as intended. This modeling method goes beyond simple checklists by connecting technical details with social and organizational factors.
Open → 2610.16916v1

Public sector teams adopt InnerSource to speed up collaboration

Adopting InnerSource in a Public Sector Organization: A Case Study

Abstract: InnerSource (IS) is increasingly viewed as a way to improve large-scale software development. However, evidence on its adoption in public sector organizations remains limited. This paper reports a study of IS adoption in a Swedish Public Sector Organization. Drawing on nine semi-structured interviews and an internal workshop with 13 participants, we examine motivations, challenges, and improvement strategies for IS adoption. The results show that the main motivations are improving reuse, strengthening cross-team collaboration, and enabling faster and more cost-efficient development. Key challenges relate to a lack of an open culture and mindset, management of reusable assets (e.g., ownership, documentation, and code visibility), and ways of working (e.g., siloed practices and limited time for contributions). The study also identified improvements to address challenges, including fostering an enabling culture and mindset for IS and knowledge sharing, strengthening management support, and establishing internal platforms and governance for reusable assets.

Mon 5 OctSoftware Engineering
The gist
Large public organizations often struggle to share and reuse software code across different teams. This paper looks at how a Swedish public agency started using InnerSource, a way of working that encourages open sharing inside the organization. The authors found this helped improve teamwork and reuse of code, but challenges included getting people to adopt a sharing mindset and managing shared code properly. They also suggest ways to overcome these issues, like better leadership support and tools for managing shared code.
Open → 2610.05947v1