Papers for
prosthetic device developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Calibration free myoelectric control matches calibrated control for cursor tasks
Is User Calibration Still Necessary for Continuous Myoelectric Control? A Closed-Loop Comparison of Calibration-Free Controllers
Abstract: The need for user-specific calibration remains an often-cited barrier to widespread adoption of myoelectric control. Cross-user models trained on large multi-user datasets can now recognize gestures from unseen users without calibration, but they have been evaluated almost exclusively offline, leaving open whether calibration is still needed in closed-loop control. This study compared six calibration-free controllers, trained on 306 users of the EMG-EPN-612 dataset and used without any calibration data from the test participant, against three calibrated controllers in a closed-loop Fitts' law target-acquisition task with sixteen participants. The calibrated controllers achieved higher offline balanced accuracy (90.6% against 73.1% for the best controller of each paradigm), but completion rates did not differ significantly between paradigms, and the highest completion rate was achieved by a calibration-free controller. Calibrated controllers moved faster on successful acquisitions, partly because of their individually fitted speed mappings, though not significantly after correction for multiple comparisons. However, every calibration-free controller produced more direct and stable trajectories than every calibrated controller, even after adjusting for cursor speed. Offline accuracy did not predict completion rate across controllers or within participants, and across paradigms higher offline accuracy was associated with poorer trajectory quality in 15 of 16 participants. Without any calibration data from the end user, a model trained across a large population matched calibrated control in completion rate and exceeded it in trajectory quality. The offline accuracy gained through calibration should therefore not be taken as evidence of a closed-loop benefit.
Tendon-driven robot arms optimized for torque and compact design
Design optimization of tendon-driven robots considering tendon wrapping and shortcut
Abstract: This study proposes a multi-objective optimization method for tendon-driven arm design, addressing the inherent trade-off between joint torque and arm thickness through tendon wrapping and shortcut effects. We formulate the problem to simultaneously maximize torque and minimize thickness, solved using NSGA-II. The algorithm optimizes tendon routing, pulley configurations, and attachment points. Results reveal Pareto-optimal designs with effective moment arm expansion via strategic shortcuts, providing practical guidelines for compact high-torque arms. The optimized configurations demonstrate non-trivial patterns beyond conventional design intuition, offering new insights for engineering efficient robotic systems.
MyoFlow improves muscle signal gesture recognition across users and sessions
MyoFlow: Anchor-Tied Rectified Flow for HD-sEMG Gesture Recognition Across Sessions and Subjects
Abstract: High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) gesture recognition supports prosthetic control, assistive robotics, and rehabilitation, but electrode re-donning and physiological variability cause distribution shifts that degrade accuracy across sessions and subjects. Generative HD-sEMG models primarily synthesize signals for augmentation; although diffusion models enhance representation learning, prediction still relies on a separate classifier. To tie learned dynamics to the decision rule, we propose MyoFlow, the first discriminative flow-matching framework for HD-sEMG recognition across sessions and subjects. It recasts classification as anchor-tied transport: a domain-conditioned rectified flow moves encoded windows toward gesture anchors that serve as transport targets and define the nearest-anchor decision geometry, enabling zero-shot prediction without an independent head. On the Hyser dataset, MyoFlow improves mean cross-session and cross-subject accuracy over the strongest diffusion-based baseline by 4.24\% and 6.37\%, respectively, and achieves 91.71\% mean zero-shot accuracy and 97.39\% mean few-shot accuracy across multiple days on the CEMHSEY dataset.