Papers for
programming language developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Guarded recursion support embedded in Lean for safer programming
Garlene: Guarded Recursion in Lean
Abstract: Extending the recursion principles of a formal system is an enticing but dangerous endeavour with a well-documented history of leading to consistency bugs. Nakano's guarded recursion is an elegant, type-based approach to soundly extend type theory with a powerful recursion principle. This makes guarded recursion useful for many applications, from programming with infinite structures such as streams to reasoning about advanced programming language features using synthetic guarded domain theory. Sadly, guarded recursion is not directly supported by any major interactive theorem prover, which leaves users of guarded recursion with unmechanised pen-and-paper proofs or mechanisations that depend on unmaintained theorem provers. In this paper, we present an implementation of guarded recursion as an embedded language in Lean consisting of a simply-typed lambda calculus for definitions and a higher-order logic for reasoning. Using Lean's excellent support for metaprogramming, our language allows users to write guarded recursive definitions in an intuitive syntax and to prove properties about them using a dedicated proof mode. We give our language a presheaf model, which we use to prove the soundness of our language and to allow users to export guarded recursive definitions and their theorems into standard Lean developments. To demonstrate the usefulness of our language, we present several case studies for programming and reasoning with guarded recursion.
Monadic interpreter and checker keep type effects separate in haskell
A monadic interpreter and type-and-effect checker
Abstract: We present a concrete implementation in Haskell of a monadic framework that includes both a small-step interpreter and a type-and-effect checker for the corresponding language. Our approach separates the language syntax from the semantics of its effects. This design allows the interpreter to remain parametric over the underlying monad, while the static checker approximates effects independently of their concrete implementation. The theoretical foundation of this framework-applied to a call-by-value lambda calculus with generic effects represented by operations that produce monadic values and are managed through handlers-was introduced in previous work, where the focus was on proving the soundness of the approach. In contrast, the present work leverages Haskell's support for modular programming and monads to demonstrate that the framework is practically implementable and usable. We illustrate the approach with examples using the monad of exceptions and the one of nondeterminism and expressions both with and without handlers.