Papers for

privacy technology developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Toolkit evaluates face deidentification methods for privacy and quality

Toolkit for Facial Deidentification

Abstract: This work presents a novel open-source toolkit designed for the evaluation of face deidentification techniques with available evaluation models. The framework provides a complete evaluation pipeline, including preprocessing, deidentification, and performance assessment, based on data utility, image quality, and identity protection metrics. It supports a variety of datasets, enabling researchers to easily benchmark new deidentification techniques. Results show the effectiveness of some techniques on maintaining privacy while preserving image utility. The toolkit is aimed at unifying future research by providing a standard evaluation framework for privacy-enhancing technologies in facial biometrics. Implementation is available at github.com/blazm/deid-toolkit.

Mon 19 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Protecting people’s identities in photos is important for privacy but hard to measure. The authors created a free toolkit that helps test how well different face-blurring or masking methods work. It checks if faces are safely hidden without ruining the usefulness or quality of images. This toolkit supports many image collections and helps everyone compare new privacy tools fairly. It makes research on face privacy easier by providing one standard way to test methods.
Open → 2610.26079v1

Limits on secure data sharing with dropouts in federated learning

Fundamental Limits of Information-Theoretic Secure Aggregation with User Dropouts in Federated Learning

Abstract: Secure aggregation enables a server to compute the sum of users' gradients or model updates without revealing individual values. With user dropouts, correlated random keys protect local gradients while allowing recovery of the desired gradient sum. We consider three phases: key distribution, masked-gradient upload, and mask elimination. Users establish correlated keys, upload masked gradients, and provide additional messages to eliminate residual aggregate masks. Existing information-theoretic schemes typically design mask-elimination communication for a prescribed dropout threshold and evaluate its cost under worst-case dropouts across the masked-gradient upload and mask-elimination phases. Such designs cannot adjust communication to actual dropout scenarios. Moreover, the randomness and communication costs of establishing correlated keys remain largely unexplored. To address these limitations, we formulate an adaptive secure aggregation framework under the T-colluding security constraint and construct a single scheme that supports all feasible dropout scenarios by adapting its communication to the actual number of dropouts. We establish converse bounds on four resources: key randomness, key-distribution communication, masked-gradient communication, and mask-elimination communication. The latter two bounds are characterized for each realized dropout set in the masked-gradient upload phase. The proposed scheme achieves the optimal masked-gradient communication rate for every feasible dropout scenario and the optimal mask-elimination communication rate in almost all feasible regimes. Its key rate and key-distribution communication rate are each optimal or within a factor of two of their respective information-theoretic optima. These results characterize the fundamental randomness and communication costs of secure aggregation with user dropouts.

Mon 19 OctInformation TheoryCryptography and SecurityMachine Learning
The gist
Secure aggregation is a way to add up many users' private data without seeing individual details, which helps keep information safe in learning systems. When some users drop out, it gets tricky to keep the sums accurate and secure. The authors studied how much secret randomness and communication is truly needed to do this in the best possible way. They made a single flexible method that adjusts to how many users drop out and proves the minimum costs for making this work securely. Their results help understand the basic limits of keeping shared data private when users leave unexpectedly.
Open → 2610.25743v1