Papers for
policy modeling teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Small extremist groups change outcomes in ai agent societies
When Extremists Enter LLM Societies: Investigating Extreme Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly serve as computational actors in multi-agent social simulations. While existing work emphasizes representative personas and average-case behavior, social science shows that persistent tail actors can disproportionately shape collective dynamics. We study this regularity in controlled LLM-based multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS). In these systems, such actors cannot be reduced to fixed scalar states: prompts, natural-language histories, and backbone generation mediate their behavior and influence. We first analyzed three properties of extremists in sociology and model the LLM extremist based on LLM-native perspective. We introduce EXAM, an EXtremist Agent Modeling framework that capable of configuring extremist agents for specific tasks and precisely controlling their population proportion, spatial distribution, interaction protocols, and measurement interfaces. Across four scenarios: congressional election, financial crisis, epidemic public opinion, and iterated prisoner's dilemma, we observe that small persistent tail groups produce measurable, backbone- and scenario-dependent collective shifts. EXAM shows how this social-science regularity manifests through language-mediated mechanisms specific to LLM-based social simulation.
Large language models reduce well-being differences but keep social patterns
Large Language Models Substantially Compress Well-Being Inequality but Largely Preserve Its Socioeconomic Structure
Abstract: Research using large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic populations has repeatedly shown that model outputs compress the diversity of human experience. This has raised doubts about whether LLM-generated data can capture meaningful differences within populations. We show that such compression does not necessarily erase the social structure of human heterogeneity. Using 93,901 respondents from 66 countries and territories in Wave 7 of the World Values Survey, we ask six LLMs to predict respondents' life satisfaction from demographic, socioeconomic, and attitudinal profiles. All six models substantially understate the overall dispersion of life satisfaction. Yet after normalizing for these differences in scale, they largely reproduce the human income gradient in well-being inequality: lower-income groups remain relatively more heterogeneous than higher-income groups. The pattern is robust to country fixed effects, equal-country weighting, WVS survey weights, and observed demographic composition, and it extends directionally to employment, education, and perceived control. Fidelity is weaker for extreme outcomes and country-specific gradients. These results show that the amount of heterogeneity preserved by an LLM and the way that heterogeneity is distributed across social groups are distinct properties. LLM-generated populations can therefore substantially compress human variation while retaining meaningful information about where that variation is concentrated.