Papers for
photonic device designers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Optical wave processors compute beyond physical diffraction limits
Functional Superoscillations in a Wave Processor
Abstract: Physical wave processors are constrained by diffraction, but the bandwidth of the mathematical functions they implement need not be set by it. Here, we demonstrate continuous and multiplexed optical processing of superoscillatory functions, in which a scalar argument is encoded onto a wavefront and a fixed diffractive wave processor synthesizes optical responses that approximate the corresponding function outputs in parallel. Unlike conventional superoscillatory optics that generates predetermined fields, superoscillation here is expressed in the input-output dependence on the encoded argument. Its frequencies are therefore distinct from the transverse spatial frequencies of propagating light and are not subject to the same diffraction-imposed cutoff. We demonstrate complex-valued superoscillatory function synthesis and introduce a multiplexed architecture that simultaneously evaluates distinct target superoscillatory functions whose harmonic content exceeds that of the optical input encoding. Visible-light experiments further validate this beyond-encoding superoscillatory regime. Together, these results establish functional superoscillation as a design principle for wave-based computation and show how interference, diffractive depth and spatial channel allocation extend the functional reach of passive wave processors. More broadly, these analyses establish a separation between functional bandwidth and physical wave bandwidth in analog optical computation.
Reinforcement learning guides crystal design with symmetry and properties
Symmetry- and Property-Aware Crystal Generation with Reinforcement Learning for Inverse Materials Design
Abstract: The inverse design of crystalline materials ultimately seeks structures with desired physical properties. However, for many functional responses, a favorable numerical value is meaningful only when supported by the symmetry of the underlying crystal. Without the appropriate crystallographic constraints, an apparent response may be ill defined, accidental, or not symmetry protected. Here we introduce SPARC, a symmetry- and property-aware reinforcement learning framework that optimizes physical objectives while preserving the structural conditions required for their realization. We demonstrate SPARC on two complementary tasks. The first targets strong uniaxial dielectric anisotropy, a tensorial response that is well defined only within appropriate crystal classes. The second maximizes the spectroscopic limited maximum efficiency, a scalar device-level objective without a prescribed symmetry class, allowing the framework to identify favorable crystallographic motifs. These results show that symmetry is not merely an additional design constraint, but a physical foundation for generating candidates with meaningful, robust, and realizable functional properties.