Papers for

photo sharing platforms

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Protect location privacy by rewriting image clues for false places

Not Where You Think: Protecting Location Privacy Against Reasoning-Based Geolocation

Abstract: Recent large reasoning models can infer where ordinary photos were taken using only visual information, creating a serious location privacy risk even when metadata and obvious geographic identifiers are removed. To understand the mechanism behind such fine-grained localization, we develop GeoTrace, a structured reasoning attack that exposes how models extract location-relevant visual clues and compose them through coarse-to-fine geographic reasoning. We evaluate GeoTrace on a worldwide benchmark of 525 ordinary images spanning natural, urban, residential, and human-centered scenes while excluding famous landmarks and direct location indicators. Our results show that GeoTrace localizes 25.71% of images within 1 km with Gemini-3-Flash and 16.95% with GPT-5-mini. More importantly, our analysis reveals a key insight in the visual clue chain: broad scene properties mainly support coarse localization, whereas precise localization disproportionately relies on small, distinctive, and editable local clues. Building on this insight, we develop GeoShift, a proactive user-side defense that breaks the visual clue chain before image release. Rather than simply removing geographic evidence, GeoShift preserves stable scene properties, selects a visually compatible false target location, and strategically rewrites high-impact geo-revealing clues to construct a coherent alternative geographic hypothesis. Experiments show that GeoShift reduces street-level localization from 16.95% to 2.48% under GPT-5-mini and from 25.71% to 3.81% under Gemini-3-Flash, while preserving visual quality and remaining effective against adaptive attacks.

Wed 21 OctCryptography and Security
The gist
Photos can reveal where they were taken even if obvious location hints are removed, because smart AI models can guess places by looking at small visual clues. The authors created GeoTrace, which shows how these models piece together broad and tiny details to pinpoint locations. Based on this, they built GeoShift, a tool that changes key clues in images to hide real locations while keeping the picture looking natural. GeoShift effectively fools AI models, greatly reducing their ability to detect exact places without degrading the photo.
Open → 2610.30439v1

Vision language models controlled to limit location detail in images

Steering Vision-Language Models for Visual-Contextual Privacy in Location Disclosure

Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) can infer sensitive information such as geolocation from subtle visual cues, creating privacy risks when responses disclose more detail than the visual context warrants. We study visual-contextual privacy in geolocation disclosure, where a VLM should reveal location information only at the granularity appropriate to the visual context depicted in the image. We first show that this contextually appropriate granularity is recoverable from pre-generation hidden states, even when generated responses are misaligned, with disclosure levels exhibiting an ordered structure along a common hidden-state direction. Motivated by this, we propose an inference-time route-and-steer framework: an ordinal granularity router maps visual-contextual privacy representations to a disclosure route, and a disclosure-level-conditioned steering module applies route-specific hidden-state interventions during decoding. Across four VLM backbones, our method improves visual-context-aware disclosure alignment, better balances over- and under-disclosure, and incurs only modest changes on general capability benchmarks. It further transfers to another dataset with a distinct data distribution and privacy-risk taxonomy.

Mon 19 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Vision-language models can sometimes reveal where a photo was taken by picking up tiny details, which might share too much private information. The authors studied how to make these models only share location details that match the picture’s visible content. They found they could detect the right level of location detail in the model’s internal signals and use that to guide how much information is shared. Their method improves the balance between too much and too little location info without hurting overall model performance.
Open → 2610.27323v1

Protect images from fake video creation by disrupting AI reading process

LETHE: Defending against Unauthorized Image-to-Video Generation via Value Diversity Collapse

Abstract: Image-to-video (I2V) diffusion models can animate a single reference image into high-quality, subject-consistent videos, posing threats of misuse as anyone can turn personal photos into fabricated videos without consent. A promising solution is to proactively add an adversarial perturbation to the image before release, such that videos generated from it would be unfaithful or visually corrupted. However, due to an insufficient understanding of what governs how subsequent frames read the reference image in modern I2V models, existing protections struggle to offer strong protection under common perturbation budgets. In this paper, we approach the problem by exploring this underlying reading mechanism. Through a convex geometric analysis, we theoretically identify the spread of the reference value vectors as a key factor governing this reading process, and empirically find that even a mild contraction of this spread can severely degrade the generated video, making it an efficient lever for protection. Guided by this insight, we propose LETHE, a novel protection method that directly disrupts this reading process. LETHE pairs two complementary objectives, where a value collapse objective drives the reference value vectors toward uniformity, while an attention attraction objective draws subsequent frames toward these collapsed tokens to amplify corruption. We further construct two human-centric I2V protection benchmarks and conduct extensive experiments with multiple modern I2V models, which demonstrate the state-of-the-art protection performance and versatility of LETHE.

Fri 9 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionCryptography and Security
The gist
Turning a single photo into a fake video can be misused to make things look real when they are not. The authors study how AI models use parts of an image to create videos and find that making the image’s details less varied can confuse these models. They create a new way to subtly change images so any video made from them looks wrong or corrupted. This method, called LETHE, works well on modern systems and can help protect personal photos from being turned into unauthorized videos.
Open → 2610.13333v1

Protective image edits survive resizing to better block malicious changes

Protective Perturbations Must Survive the Resize: Scale-Robust Image Immunization against Malicious Editing

Abstract: Protective perturbations aim to stop malicious instruction-guided editing of personal photos, but they are optimized and evaluated at the editor's working resolution, whereas shared photos have 10 megapixels or more and editors first downscale them by an unknown factor. We model this resize as a frequency-selective channel. In this model, a perturbation computed at the native resolution decays with the downscaling factor and is weak even without a resize, and a perturbation computed at a fixed working resolution protects only a window of scales. The best worst-case protection over an unknown range of scales degrades only logarithmically with the width of the range, and averaging over scales does not reach it. Guided by this analysis, we propose SRIM, which samples a grid of anchor scales covering the whole range, with weights that favor the currently weakest scale, at the cost of standard expectation over transformation. On full-resolution photos of 9 to 30 megapixels and downscaling factors from 2 to 8, SRIM raises the worst-case disruption of FLUX.2-klein edits from 0.192 LPIPS, attained by the strongest published protection, to 0.463. At equal visibility, it roughly doubles the protection. The same protected photos also protect against the 9B model and against FLUX.2-dev, with worst cases of 0.450 and 0.386 against at most 0.184 for published protections, and SRIM leads on InstructPix2Pix as well.

Mon 5 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Photos shared online are often resized by unknown amounts before someone edits them, which makes protective changes in the image weaker or ineffective. The authors studied how resizing affects these protections and found that making protections work across all sizes is challenging but possible. They developed a new method called SRIM that creates image protections strong enough to survive resizing and still block unwanted AI edits. This method roughly doubles the protection compared to the best existing ones and works well against several powerful editing models.
Open → 2610.07464v1