Papers for

particle physics experiment teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Foundation models improve particle track finding and identification

Track finding and particle identification performance with particle physics foundation models

Abstract: Modern high energy nuclear and particle physics experiments produce large amounts of sparse data that must be reduced significantly in size before performing physics analysis. Recently, there has been an effort to evaluate Foundation Models as a potential tool for performing data analysis. These models have been shown to learn features in high dimensional datasets based on the multi-modal data they are trained on. To show their effectiveness at performing complex pattern recognition tasks, such as reconstructing charged particles in a magnetic field, we evaluated the performance of a Foundation Model based reconstruction on several downstream tasks with a dataset composed of spacepoints in a Time Projection Chamber. We show that the performance of the Foundation Model based data analysis significantly improves upon that of traditional methods, and furthermore can be adapted to learn additional tasks that are not necessarily related to the initial training objective.

Thu 22 OctMachine Learning
The gist
High energy physics experiments generate huge amounts of data that are hard to analyze quickly. The authors tested a type of AI called Foundation Models to help make sense of this data by recognizing patterns of particles moving through a detector. They found these models did better than traditional methods at tracking charged particles inside a magnetic field and could also learn to identify other related features. This suggests these models may be a useful new tool for analyzing complex physics data.
Open → 2610.31180v1

Anomaly detection methods improve identifying rare events at HL-LHC

Local Diagnostics of Learned Event Representations for Anomaly Detection at the HL-LHC

Abstract: Anomaly detection, the identification of collision events that deviate from Standard Model expectations, is one of the most promising model-agnostic strategies for new-physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider. Searching for rare events in learned low-dimensional representations removes the need to commit to hand-crafted observables a priori, but sacrifices the immediate physical interpretation those observables provide. For anomaly detection to enter a discovery pipeline, flagged events must therefore be diagnosed locally, both to distinguish potential new physics from mismodeling or detector effects and to identify observables for targeted follow-up searches. We evaluate supervised and self-supervised neural embedding strategies on COLLIDE-2V, a 750-million-event dataset simulated under realistic High-Luminosity LHC conditions, using the reconstruction error of an autoencoder trained in the learned latent space as the anomaly score. Across the configurations and benchmark signals considered, supervised objectives, which exploit simulation process labels during training, generally outperform their self-supervised counterparts and, in their best configurations, improve on an autoencoder trained directly on kinematic features, raising the signal efficiency at 10% background acceptance on all held-out processes. We further introduce a local diagnostic pipeline that fits a Gaussian Mixture Model to the SM latent space, profiles each component through high-level observables without process labels, localizes the flagged events, and ranks observables by their local discriminating power. The ranking recovers the defining kinematics of the held-out processes, while correlating the anomaly score with the same observables quantifies how closely the score tracks them, revealing cases where the most discriminating observable is not the one the score follows most closely.

Fri 9 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
At the Large Hadron Collider, scientists look for unusual particle collision events that might show new physics beyond the Standard Model. The authors study neural network techniques to find these rare events using simplified data representations. They show that methods trained with labeled simulations perform better at spotting anomalies than those without labels. They also develop a new way to explain which physical measurements make these events stand out, helping to understand and follow up on potential discoveries.
Open → 2610.13437v1

Machine learning becomes essential for LHC physics workflows

Machine learning for the LHC physics program: a 2025-2026 stocktake

Abstract: The first sentence of this abstract--and the introduction to these proceedings--was authored by a human, but the bulk of this document was generated by an agentic AI system. In this talk, I take stock of machine learning (ML) for the LHC physics program over the twelve months from May 2025 to May 2026. The corpus is the HEPML Living Review, split at May 2025 into 1,756 earlier papers and 569 later ones. An AI pipeline surveyed the 569 abstracts, ranked them by citations, recency, theme, and collaboration involvement, and read 103 papers in full (95 from after the split, plus 8 earlier baseline papers), producing a structured note for each. The notes were then synthesized into six claims about the state of the field, checked by independent reviewer agents, and re-verified against the source papers. The headline claim is that (1) ML for high-energy physics (HEPML) stopped being a research area that builds tools and became infrastructure that the LHC physics program depends on: ATLAS and CMS now publish physics results that depend on neural networks, and the archived ALEPH data have re-entered production. The other five claims are: (2) simulation-based inference and foundation models are two revolutions starting to merge; (3) AI agents are the genuinely new front, with 47 papers in twelve months and no adopted measurement yet; (4) "do we trust it?" is the fastest-growing agenda, with one recent paper in five about uncertainty, calibration, or interpretability; (5) what is slowing down is informative, since equivariance was absorbed into a tool and model-specific phenomenology ceded ground to model-agnostic searches; and (6) theory ML crossed a capability threshold in multiple research areas. I close with what is settled, what is incoming, and what is open, and briefly discuss the concerns raised by this way of working with AI.

Sat 26 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Machine learning (ML) has become a core part of how scientists analyze data at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), powering major experiments like ATLAS and CMS. Over one year, a detailed review found ML tools have shifted from research projects to foundational infrastructure relied on for physics results. The study also noted growing interest in AI agents, better understanding of model trustworthiness, and merging new AI advances with physics. This work summarizes the state of ML in high-energy physics and discusses both progress and open challenges.
Open → 2609.32874v1

Industrial foundation models enhance real-time particle detector data processing

Leveraging Industrial Foundation Models at the Edge of Particle Physics Detectors via Distillation Learning and Hardware Co-design

Abstract: Data acquisition (DAQ) systems at future particle physics experiments stand to benefit from the extremes of AI/ML development: large-scale foundation models can enhance the performance of feature extraction algorithms, and small-scale on-detector deployments can enable real-time intelligent data handling. This work provides the first fine-tuning of an industrial foundation model for particle physics DAQ. Starting from the backbone of Google Research's TimesFM (Time Series Foundation Model), we demonstrate fine-tuning on real-time regression tasks for drift chamber trackers and dual-readout calorimeters. Furthermore, the fine-tuned TimesFM model is distilled into a student and co-designed with FPGA implementation to enable these models to run in real-time at future colliders. The fine-tuned distillations meet or exceed the performance of previously published AI/ML solutions for each task. Further, the pipeline of distillation and model compression from TimesFM is generic and can be easily adapted to a variety of 1D waveform tasks across domains.

Sun 20 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Big AI models can help handle the huge data from particle physics experiments better, but they are often too slow or large to run where data is collected. This work shows how to fine-tune a large time-series model from Google to do fast and accurate data analysis directly on detectors. The authors then shrink this model and design it to run efficiently on special hardware called FPGAs. Their smaller model works well in real time and can be used for many waveform analysis tasks beyond particle physics.
Open → 2609.23385v1

Hypergraph learning improves particle event reconstruction accuracy

Comprehensive reconstruction of collider events with hypergraph representation learning and graph-conditioned diffusion

Abstract: In particle collider experiments, event reconstruction is the task of inferring the kinematics of short-lived particles produced in the hard scatter from the stable final states recorded by detectors. We decompose event reconstruction into two primary tasks: assigning measured jets and charged leptons to parent particles, and predicting unmeasured neutrino kinematics. We present VyPER, a novel geometric learning framework that represents collider events as hypergraphs with a physics-inspired topology. VyPER combines the supervised classification of hyperedges for particle assignment with a diffusion model for predicting neutrino kinematics, leveraging a joint loss function to optimize both reconstruction tasks within a unified framework. We showcase VyPER across several proton-proton collision processes, comparing its performance to existing analytical and machine-learning-based reconstruction techniques. In doing so, we demonstrate that accurate event reconstruction is achievable across a diverse range of Standard Model physics processes, opening new avenues for precision measurements in the Higgs boson, electroweak, and top-quark sectors.

Wed 16 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Reconstructing particle collisions means figuring out how particles created in high-energy experiments behaved before they disappeared. The authors break this task into two parts: matching detected particle signals to their original particles and guessing unseen neutrino behaviors. They introduce VyPER, which uses a special kind of network model called a hypergraph combined with a diffusion method to do both tasks together better than previous approaches. This improves understanding of events in proton collisions and helps with precise measurements in important physics areas.
Open → 2609.18928v1

Self-supervised learning improves heavy particle mass estimates in physics

Self-Supervised Learning for Robust Resonance Mass Regression in Cascade Decays

Abstract: Reconstructing the mass of a heavy resonance from its decay products with missing energy is one of the central tasks that directly determine the sensitivity in new physics searches at collider experiments. Supervised learning approaches to this problem often struggle to generalize well due to the presence of various systematic uncertainties and distribution shifts. Exhausting all possible variations in the labeled data can be very compute-intensive, while a failure of the model to generalize can corrupt the reconstructed resonance widths that are critical in peak-hunting analyses. In this work, following the foundation model paradigm, we use a self-supervised approach to pre-train a transformer encoder with VICReg to learn an embedding invariant to various corruptions, then fine-tune it for mass regression on a heavy resonance with masses ranging from 2.5 to 6.5 TeV and a SUSY-like cascade decay into an eleven-body final state. We show that the pre-trained model reconstructs sharper resonance peaks and has a more stable performance under various realistic corruptions, compared to a supervised model of the same architecture trained on the same augmented data from scratch.

Tue 15 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Finding the mass of heavy particles from their broken pieces is hard because some information can be missing or tricky. The authors use a special kind of AI that first learns on its own to understand patterns, then fine-tunes itself to guess masses better. This method helps them get clearer signals and stay accurate even when data is noisy or changed. Their approach works better than traditional AI trained with labeled data from the start.
Open → 2609.17726v1