Papers for

particle physicists

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Efficient transformer improves particle jet tagging at colliders

This is SParTA: A modular, efficient and scalable transformer architecture for jet-tagging

Abstract: We present the Sparse Particle-interaction Transformer Architecture (SParTA), a modular, scalable, and efficient transformer for jet tagging at high-energy colliders. Exploiting the steeply falling transverse-momentum ($p_T$) spectrum of jet constituents, SParTA factorizes constituent processing into two topological regimes. Ordered by descending $p_T$, only the $N$ hardest constituents (the hard core) participate in quadratic $O(N^2)$ differential interaction attention driven by pairwise physical and learned relational features. The remaining soft constituents are integrated via linear $O(lN)$ cross-attention to the hard core, preserving soft-radiation and color-flow information while avoiding the $O(l^2)$ memory bottleneck of full self-attention over all $l$ constituents. Pairwise interaction features are computed dynamically in-network from constituent four-momenta and conditioned on global jet-level substructure observables. On the quark-gluon tagging benchmark, a 300K-parameter SParTA model achieves an AUC of 92.02% and accuracy of 85.06%, matching the 2.14M-parameter Particle Transformer (ParT) at one-seventh the parameter count and outperforming IAFormer by 21% in background rejection at 30% signal efficiency. On the boosted top-tagging benchmark, SParTA outperforms ParT and ParticleNet with 511K parameters, while we analyze the architectural trade-offs relative to fully dense multi-layer interaction networks.

Mon 19 OctMachine Learning
The gist
This paper introduces a new kind of computer model called SParTA that helps identify particles produced in powerful collisions in particle accelerators. It works by focusing on the most important parts first, then efficiently adding less important details without slowing down too much. The authors show that SParTA performs as well as or better than existing models but uses fewer computing resources. This can help scientists analyze particle collision data more quickly and accurately.
Open → 2610.27106v1

Physics-informed neural network models pion form factor precisely

PINNing the pion: conformal deep learning for $F_π(s)$ and the $(g-2)_μ$ hadronic contribution

Abstract: Extracting the pion electromagnetic form factor $F_π(s)$ through phenomenological curve-fitting models introduces model dependence, unphysical artefacts, and kinematic inconsistencies. We introduce a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) embedded in a conformal $z$-plane that constructs $F_π(s)$ directly from first principles across spacelike and timelike domains: charge normalisation and Schwarz reflection are enforced by construction, while Cauchy-Riemann analyticity, dispersion relations, Watson's theorem, and perturbative QCD asymptotics enter through the loss functional. Thus, the fundamental S-matrix principles dictate the form factor's behaviour while data act as constraints. Mapping the cut complex plane onto the unit disk bounds the Hessian norm and prevents Neural Tangent Kernel spectral starvation, two known failure modes of deep-learning optimisation. Besides $e^+e^-$ scattering data, we also incorporate $τ$-decay data through a switch that isolates the pure isovector form factor natively, bypassing model-dependent isospin-breaking pre-corrections. The network organically yields an interior zero-free form factor, while the framework tests experimental tensions around the $ρ(770)$ peak against analyticity and dispersion constraints. We obtain model-independent estimates of the pion charge radius, $\langle r_π^2 \rangle = 0.435 \pm 0.008_{\text{stat}} \pm 0.007_{\text{cali}}$ fm$^2$, the second-sheet pole parameters, $m_ρ^{\text{pole}} = 761.72\pm 1.04$ MeV and $Γ_ρ^{\text{pole}} = 135.99 \pm 1.20$ MeV, and the two-pion contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, $a_μ^{ππ} = (506.48 \pm 2.02_{\text{stat}} \pm 1.70_{\text{cali}}) \times 10^{-10}$.

Wed 30 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Measuring a property called the pion electromagnetic form factor often relies on fitting models that can introduce errors or inconsistencies. The authors designed a neural network guided by fundamental physics principles to directly determine this form factor more reliably across different energy regions. Their approach respects key rules from particle physics and incorporates experimental data, producing precise estimates of important physical quantities related to the pion and its role in particle interactions. This helps improve understanding of the pion’s structure and its contribution to the muon’s magnetic properties.
Open → 2609.40008v1

Quark flavor shapes explained by extra dimensional wave overlaps

The shape of quark flavors

Abstract: We construct the Yukawa couplings of the quark sector as overlap integrals of Gaussian wave functions in extra spatial dimensions. Assuming that the wave function of each chiral fermion is localised at a point in the extra dimensions, while that of the Higgs doublet is flat, the Yukawa matrix elements are determined by the relative positions of the three left-handed quark doublets, $q_1$, $q_2$, $q_3$, and the six right-handed quark singlets, $u_1$, $u_2$, $u_3$, $d_1$, $d_2$, $d_3$. We employ numerical optimisation techniques from machine learning to identify field configurations that satisfy all current experimental constraints on the quark Yukawa sector. In this framework, the large hierarchy of quark masses arises naturally, since the overlap integrals of Gaussian wave functions are exponentially sensitive to ${\mathcal O}(1)$ separations in the extra dimensions.

Sat 19 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Scientists studied why quarks, the tiny building blocks of matter, have different masses. They proposed that these differences come from how quark particles are positioned in tiny hidden dimensions beyond our usual space. By treating each quark’s presence as a small Gaussian bump and the Higgs field as uniform, the overlap of these bumps in extra space determines interaction strengths, explaining mass differences naturally. They used machine learning to find quark arrangements that match observed particle behaviors.
Open → 2609.22812v1

Machine learning slightly improves invisible dark boson detection at collider

Machine Learning for Invisible Dark Boson Searches at the Electron-Ion Collider

Abstract: We investigate whether adding $t$, the positive magnitude of the squared nuclear four-momentum transfer, enables boosted decision trees (BDTs) to improve invisible-dark-boson selection relative to optimized rectangular cuts at the Electron-Ion Collider. We model coherent exclusive scalar and vector production at generator level in electron-gold collisions at 18 GeV by 100 GeV per nucleon. Both methods use identical weighted samples, inputs, preselection, and optimization objectives. Using only electron information, the BDT provided no consistent advantage over optimized cuts for signal selection across 11 masses for each boson type. When both methods also use $t$, the BDT distinguishes signal from background slightly better than optimized cuts at 10 GeV for both boson types. These results motivate further investigation of machine learning in EIC dark-boson searches through exclusive processes where $t$ can be reconstructed.

Fri 18 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Finding invisible particles called dark bosons is challenging because they leave no direct signals in detectors. The authors studied whether a machine learning method called boosted decision trees (BDTs) can do better than simple threshold cuts at spotting these particles in electron-gold collisions. Using only electron data, the machine learning approach showed no clear improvement. However, when including a specific measured quantity called momentum transfer, BDTs performed slightly better for certain particle masses. This suggests machine learning may offer small benefits in these searches when more detailed data is used.
Open → 2609.22484v1