Abstract: We study the query complexity of testing membership in structured string languages, focusing on Dyck languages and natural generalizations. A tester receives query access to a word and must distinguish valid inputs from words that are far in Hamming distance, while inspecting only a sublinear number of positions. Our results sharpen the boundary between constant-query testability and polynomial query complexity. First, we prove an $Ω(n^{2/5})$ lower bound for testing Dyck languages $D_m$ with any fixed number $m\ge2$ of parenthesis types, improving the previous $Ω(n^{1/5})$ lower bound of Fischer, Magniez, and Starikovskaya (SODA `18) and nearly matching their upper bound of $O(n^{2/5+o(1)})$. Furthermore, we show that all nonadaptive algorithms for these problems require $Ω(n^{1/2})$ queries. Our lower bounds use a Pólya-urn process to construct the hard distribution; Second, we identify a broad class of weighted-parenthesis languages, which we call {\em excursion languages,} that remain constant-query testable. These languages encode bounded-step walks that stay nonnegative and return to zero. For every fixed excursion language, we give a nonadaptive tester with query complexity $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$, and we prove this dependence on $\varepsilon$ is optimal, even for adaptive algorithms. As a special case, we obtain the tight $Θ(1/\varepsilon^2)$ query complexity of testing $D_1$, improving the previous $O(\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ upper bound and giving the first matching two-sided-error lower bound. Third, we construct a simple hard language, Hidden String, that is generated by a deterministic linear grammar but nevertheless requires $Ω(n^{2/5})$ adaptive queries and $Ω(n^{1/2})$ nonadaptive queries to test. This shows that polynomial query complexity appears even for highly restricted string languages.