online recommendation teams

Abstract: Ensemble sampling offers a practical approach to randomized exploration by maintaining a collection of models, but how small an ensemble can be while retaining strong regret guarantees remains unresolved. In particular, the existing guarantees use an ensemble size of $Θ(d\log T)$, leaving a logarithmic gap in the horizon $T$ relative to the intrinsic $Ω(d)$ ensemble-size barrier. We aim to narrow this gap by proposing an ensemble sampling algorithm that refreshes the ensemble only when the regularized Gram matrix changes substantially. This mechanism localizes the perturbation analysis to epochs with controlled Gram-matrix drift and reduces the sufficient ensemble size to $Θ(d\log d+d\log\log T)$, while preserving the state-of-the-art $\tilde O(d^{3/2}\sqrt T)$ regret for ensemble sampling with arbitrary bounded arm sets. We further show that, when the arm set is finite of cardinality $K$, the proposed algorithm achieves the sharper regret bound $\tilde O(d\sqrt{T\log K})$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ensemble-sampling guarantee that simultaneously recovers both canonical regret scalings known for randomized linear bandit algorithms: the $\tilde O(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T})$ rate for arbitrary bounded arm sets and the $\tilde O (d\sqrt{T\log K})$ rate for finite arm sets. The algorithm also admits an anytime implementation without resetting past data, and experiments show that it remains competitive with baselines while using substantially smaller ensembles.

Abstract: Consistent submodular maximization studies the tradeoff between solution quality and stability when elements arrive over time. For a monotone submodular objective, which models diminishing returns, an algorithm maintains a set of at most $k$ available elements and changes only $O(1)$ elements after each insertion. Dütting et al. [2025] established a tight $2/3$ approximation with unrestricted computation and a polynomial-time $0.51$ approximation. They left open at STOC 2025 whether efficient algorithms can match the offline $1-1/e$ guarantee. We resolve this problem by proving that the supremum approximation achievable with polynomially many value queries and worst-case constant recourse is \[ β=2-\sqrt2\approx0.5858<1-1/e. \] For every $\varepsilon>0$, our randomized algorithm attains $β-\varepsilon$ with $O(\varepsilon^{-2})$ changes per insertion. Any fixed improvement requires exponentially many queries before one critical insertion or linear recourse of $Ω(k)$ changes at that insertion, even with unlimited queries afterwards. This gap quantifies the cost of consistency: the current oracle hides which elements will be needed after an arrival. We also determine the exact curvature-dependent threshold $1-(\sqrt2-1)\vartheta$, attain $1-1/e-\varepsilon$ for weighted coverage with $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$ recourse, and separate the existence of universal future-price certificates from their efficient computation. Our algorithm has a bounded-bit polynomial-time implementation for polynomial-bit rational oracle answers; the lower bound uses only logarithmic-bit rational answers.