Papers for

online recommendation systems

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Online optimization algorithm adapts to delays and loss types

Universal Online Convex Optimization With Delayed Feedback

Abstract: We study universal online convex optimization with delayed feedback. We develop a single algorithm that simultaneously adapts to general convex, strongly convex, and exp-concave losses without prior knowledge of the curvature class or parameters. Our regret bounds match the best known dependence on the time horizon $T$ and delays up to doubly logarithmic factors: roughly $\sqrt{T + d_{\mathrm{tot}}}$ for convex losses and $σ_{\max}\log T$ rates with curved losses, where $d_{\mathrm{tot}}$ is the total cumulative delay and $σ_{\max}$ is the maximum number of simultaneously missing observations. Our main technical contribution is a delayed meta-learner with a second-order excess-loss guarantee, which enables curvature-adaptive aggregation of delayed base learners. In addition, our new exp-concave base learner yields a sharper regret bound which improves the state-of-the-art delay dependence by replacing the maximum delay with the potentially much smaller $σ_{\max}$, while retaining the complementary $\sqrt{d_{\mathrm{tot}}}$ dependence.

Tue 20 OctMachine Learning
The gist
This paper tackles the problem of making good decisions step-by-step when there is a delay in receiving feedback about those decisions. The authors developed one algorithm that works well for different types of problems without needing to know details beforehand. It adjusts automatically to how quickly the feedback arrives and how complex the problem is. This improves performance compared to previous methods, especially when multiple pieces of feedback are delayed at the same time.
Open → 2610.28058v1

Thompson sampling adapts wisely to changing rewards with controlled forgetting

When May a Bandit Leave Its Anchor? E-Process-Authorized Thompson Sampling under Non-stationarity

Abstract: Stationarity rewards memory, but after a change the same history can mislead. We ask when forgetting should be permitted. E-process-authorized Thompson sampling (e-ATS) gives each arm full-history and discounted Beta states. An anytime-valid e-process first authorizes the discounted state, then a reversible relevance score controls its influence. Before authorization, e-ATS exactly follows optimistic Thompson sampling (OTS). Under a Beta-Bernoulli prior-predictive stationary model, e-ATS's probability of ever departing from OTS is at most the chosen $α_E$, without fitted thresholds. Relative to e-ATS, removing authorization increased mean normalized dynamic pseudo-regret by $38.4\%$ on the registered suite but reduced it by $7.5\%$ on the literature-derived replay suite. Therefore, evidence controls when adaptation begins, not whether it always helps.

Fri 2 OctMachine Learning
The gist
When a system learns from past experiences, it can get confused if the situation changes suddenly. The authors study a method called e-ATS that decides when to 'forget' old information and adapt to new patterns. Their method uses a special test to determine if it is appropriate to discount past data before changing course. This approach helps avoid mistakes caused by outdated memories and shows better results in some test scenarios, though sometimes always adapting still helps. Overall, the method lets the data itself control when to start adapting to change.
Open → 2610.03646v1

Linear contextual bandits achieve near optimal regret bounds with dynamic action sets

Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linear Contextual Bandits with Arbitrary Adaptive Action Sets

Abstract: We study stochastic linear contextual bandits with arbitrary action menus that may depend on the fixed parameter and the interaction history. We establish matching upper and lower bounds, up to logarithmic factors. Let $d$ be the dimension, $K$ be the menu size, and $T$ the time horizon. For $2\le K\le d$, we prove an upper bound $\widetilde O(K^{1/4}\sqrt{dT})$. When $T\ge d^2$, we further prove a lower bound $Ω(K^{1/4}\sqrt{dT})$. Thus, for $T\ge d^2$ and $2\le K\le d$, the upper and lower bounds match up to logarithmic factors, and the polynomial dependence on $K$ is optimal. Compared with the previous $\widetilde O(\sqrt{dKT})$ bound, our upper bound improves the dependence on $K$ by a factor of $K^{1/4}$. For $K\ge d$, we prove an upper bound $\widetilde O_{d,T}\left(\sqrt{dT}\min\{\sqrt d,(d\log K)^{1/4}\}\right)$ and a lower bound $Ω\left(\sqrt{dT}\min\left\{\sqrt d,\left(\frac{d\log K}{\log(2d)}\right)^{1/4}\right\}\right)$. Here, $\widetilde O_{d,T}$ omits logarithmic factors only in $d$ and $T$. In particular, for polynomially large $K\ge d$, the upper and lower bounds both scale as $d^{3/4}\sqrt T$ up to logarithmic factors, improving the standard $\widetilde O(d\sqrt T)$ rate by a factor of $d^{1/4}$. As $K$ grows further, the regret smoothly recovers the $d\sqrt T$ scale once $\log K$ reaches order $d$.

Mon 14 SeptMachine LearningComputer Science and Game Theory
The gist
This paper looks at a problem where a system must pick actions based on changing options and past results, aiming to do almost as well as the best fixed choice. The authors improved the understanding of how the size and complexity of choices affect the system's performance. They show that for many settings, their new method is close to the best possible, even when the options adapt based on past outcomes. This means better decision-making algorithms can be designed for complex, changing environments.
Open → 2609.15170v1