Papers for

online decision system designers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Computational limits found for tracking few experts in convex optimization

Tracking a Small Set of Experts in Online Convex Optimization

Abstract: For the fundamental problem of prediction from expert advice, Freund asked whether one could compete with a comparator that switches $k$ times among only $m$ experts. For a discrete set of experts, this problem was resolved by Bousquet and Warmuth (2020), who gave an efficient algorithm with optimal regret matching the information-theoretic limit. We study the analogous problem in online convex optimization, where the action space is continuous. An inefficient algorithm can be derived by discretizing the action space and applying the Bousquet--Warmuth algorithm, giving regret of $\widetilde{O}(md+k)$, while the best known efficient algorithm for this problem has regret $\widetilde{O}(dk)$. We show that this computational inefficiency is inherent, establishing a separation between the information-theoretic and polynomial-time regret achievable for this problem. Specifically, under the hypergraphic planted-clique conjecture, we show that for every polynomial-time algorithm there exist instances for which it incurs at least $(k\sqrt d)^{1-o(1)}$ regret.

Wed 14 OctMachine Learning
The gist
This paper studies how well an algorithm can follow the advice of a small number of experts when making decisions repeatedly, especially when decisions involve continuous choices. While it is possible in theory to do very well by looking at all possibilities, the authors show that any algorithm that runs efficiently on a computer cannot always achieve the best possible performance. They prove this limitation by connecting it to a famous hard problem in computer science about finding hidden groups in networks. This means there is a fundamental trade-off between how accurately we can track experts and how quickly we can compute.
Open → 2610.20416v1

Policy optimization improves decision making in adversarial settings

Closing the Horizon Gap in Policy Optimization for Adversarial MDPs

Abstract: We consider policy optimization for online episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with adversarial losses and bandit feedback. Policy optimization updates the policy locally at each state and avoids optimization over the occupancy-measure polytope, but its existing regret bounds are larger by a factor of the horizon $H$ than those of occupancy-measure-based algorithms. We close this gap by using regularized $Q$-functions, which allow us to control the stability of the local updates jointly over all state-action pairs rather than separately at each state. The resulting algorithm attains high-probability regret bounds of $\widetilde O(\sqrt{HS(H+A)T})$ for known transitions and $\widetilde O(HS\sqrt{AT})$ for unknown transitions, where $S$ is the number of states, $A$ the number of actions, and $T$ the number of episodes. Both bounds improve the horizon dependence of existing policy optimization bounds, and the latter matches the best-known bound. We further extend the algorithm to adversarial linear-mixture MDPs and obtain the same improvement in the horizon dependence.

Thu 8 OctMachine Learning
The gist
When computers learn to make decisions step-by-step in complex situations, they must plan ahead across many actions. Existing methods for this planning are slower because they consider the entire timeline more than necessary. The authors found a way to speed up this process by carefully controlling how the decision updates happen, reducing unnecessary steps. This leads to better performance in challenging environments where outcomes can change adversarially. Their approach works even when the computer doesn’t initially know how actions affect future states.
Open → 2610.12362v1