Papers for

online content moderators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Media intelligence platform detects fake photos videos and audio

Media Intelligence Platform: Multimodal Detection of Synthetic and Manipulated Content

Abstract: The rapid progress of generative artificial intelligence has led to a significant increase in manipulated multimedia content, including synthetic faces, forged videos, AI-generated images, fake audio, and locally edited images. Existing detection approaches are typically designed for a single manipulation type, limiting their applicability in real-world scenarios involving heterogeneous media sources. In this work, we present the Media Intelligence Platform (MIP), a unified web-based framework for multimodal media forensics integrating specialized modules for fake video detection, face morphing detection, AI-generated image detection, audio deepfake detection, localized image manipulation detection, and text analysis. Its modular architecture enables flexible integration of heterogeneous models and supports future extensions for emerging manipulation techniques. Experimental results on representative benchmark datasets demonstrate reliable detection performance across multiple media modalities while providing a practical and user-friendly interface for forensic investigations. The platform highlights the potential of unified multimodal systems for comprehensive deepfake detection in real-world environments, and is accompanied by a public demonstrator released with this workshop submission to support reproducibility and community evaluation.

Tue 20 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMultimedia
The gist
Synthetic and manipulated media like fake faces, videos, and audio are becoming more common as AI improves. The authors created the Media Intelligence Platform to detect many types of fake or altered media all in one place. This web-based system uses different specialized tools for spotting fake videos, AI-made images, altered audio, and more. Tests show it works reliably across various media types and helps investigators analyze suspicious content. It can also be expanded to handle new kinds of manipulations in the future.
Open → 2610.27974v1

Large language models learn to detect polite but hostile language better

Honeyed Words, Hidden Daggers: Benchmarking and Training LLMs to See Through Mock Politeness

Abstract: The Chinese idiom "kou mi fu jian" ("honeyed words, hidden daggers") names speech that is polite in form but hostile in function. We present ZhenhuanBench, a 1,592-item benchmark built from expert commentary on Empresses in the Palace, covering speaker intent, emotion-language mismatch, and per-listener uptake. Text-only evaluation covers 34 LLMs. GPT-6 Astra leads the leaderboard at 73.48% overall, while its listener-reaction score is 58.37%. The annotations also supply supervised traces and string-verifiable training rewards. With 338 gold traces, an 8B model outperforms teacher distillation on identical items. Subsequent RL saturates, and chance correction reduces the estimated recoverable performance gap by a factor of 7.5. Our CPR-GRPO loop (Compress-Probe-Replenish) uses this estimate to weight gold supervision, reaching 67.0 on public multiple-choice tasks and 74.5 under the training-matched hidden protocol. Without target-task training, CPR outperforms Base, SFT, and GRPO across six Chinese and English pragmatic and sarcasm evaluations. On three external datasets, training with CPR yields higher mean Macro-F1 than SFT and GRPO.

Mon 19 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
People sometimes say things that sound polite but are actually meant to be hurtful or hostile. The authors built a special test called ZhenhuanBench to measure how well language AI models can spot this kind of sneaky speech. They tested many models and found ways to train smaller AIs to get better at recognizing this hidden hostility. Their methods showed improvements on several different tests about language intent and sarcasm. This helps AI better understand the real meaning behind polite words that have a hidden negative intent.
Open → 2610.26059v1

AI image forgery detection improves with context aware adaptation

COMPASS: Contextual Moment Prior Alignment for Generalizable AIGI Detection

Abstract: Generalizable AI-generated image (AIGI) and deepfake detection remain challenging due to the asymmetry phenomenon, where adaptation to limited training distributions can degrade the transferable representations of Vision Foundation Models (VFMs). Recent subspace adaptation methods mitigate this issue by freezing high-magnitude principal components while adapting the residual subspace. However, such magnitude-based decomposition is data-agnostic and does not explicitly account for target-relevant semantics, potentially leading to semantic misalignment. We propose COMPASS (COntextual Moment Prior Alignment for Subspace Separation), a data-aware subspace adaptation framework that uses a small unlabeled Semantic Proxy Set to estimate target activation statistics. COMPASS incorporates activation covariance into the decomposition of pre-trained weights, preserving target-relevant representations as a stable semantic reference while the residual adapter learns forgery-related variations. The proxy calibration requires no gradient-based optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate strong generalization across cross-dataset, cross-method, joint cross-dataset-method, and open-world cross-generator evaluations, achieving state-of-the-art performance on both Deepfake and AIGI detection benchmarks.

Tue 13 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting fake images made by artificial intelligence is hard because models trained on certain types of fakes often fail on new types. The authors introduce COMPASS, a method that uses a small set of related images without labels to help a detection system better learn important features tied to real content. This approach helps the system focus on meaningful patterns and improves its ability to spot forgeries across different datasets and AI generation methods. COMPASS does this calibration without additional training steps, making it practical and effective.
Open → 2610.18034v1

Motion aware deepfake videos can be detected with new method

Stop My Dancing! Understanding, Detecting and Attributing Motion-Aware Deepfake Videos

Abstract: Pose-guided diffusion models can now synthesize entire human figures in motion, spawning a new class of deepfakes: Motion Aware Deepfake (MAD) that have already reached hundreds of millions of viewers. To better understand this emerging threat, we construct the first MAD-specific benchmark and measurement framework, containing over 1.5 million frames that mix 1,363 real and 30,122 synthetic videos from six controllable generators, with realistic perturbations and open-world evaluation splits. Then, we dissect MAD and discover that, despite their global coherence, these videos betray faint yet reliable cues: because the model relies on limited input frames for motion synthesis, it must predict and simulate coherent movement at motion boundaries, thereby producing high-frequency artifacts along with model-specific spectral fingerprints. Based on the observations obtained from analysis on dataset, we propose MoDA, the first defense framework tailored to detect and attribute MAD videos. MoDA couples spatial semantics with steganalysis-rich frequency features via cross-domain alignment and multi-scale aggregation, achieving 94.8% in-distribution and 89.1% cross-dataset detection accuracy gains of 10% to 25% over prior work and 91.5% model attribution accuracy. MoDA achieves 81.94% accuracy on 200 clips produced by two unseen commercial MAD platforms, indicating promising zero-shot transfer, and 78.13% detection accuracy on 1,200 unseen MAD video clips (55k frames in total) collected from the open Internet. Under white-box, gray-box, and black-box adaptive attacks, MoDA maintains relatively stable detection and attribution performance while the accuracies of the baselines drop rapidly.

Thu 8 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionCryptography and Security
The gist
Fake videos that show moving people can now be made very realistically, which can trick many viewers. The authors created a large test collection of these fake videos and real ones to better understand them. They found these videos have tiny signs in how movement is created that give them away. Using these clues, they built a system called MoDA that can detect and say which method made the fake video with high accuracy. MoDA also works well on unseen fake videos and can still detect fakes even when attackers try to hide them.
Open → 2610.11496v1

Multi-model system detects deepfake images with visual explanations

MSU Team at the Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge 2026: Grounded Artifact Evidence for Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Recent advances in generative image models have made many manipulated images highly realistic, raising the need for detectors that are not only accurate but also able to provide visual evidence for their decisions. In this paper, we present our solution to the Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge [2] on the XPlainVerse dataset [1], where systems are required to predict whether an image is real or fake and generate both complex and simple explanations grounded in visible forensic cues. Our method follows a modular detection-and-explanation design. For the real/fake decision, we build a multi-backbone detector that combines several DINOv3 models with Mesorch manipulation-localization features, bringing together pretrained visual representations, DCT-aware cues, and multi-scale forensic information. To inject explanation evidence into the detector, we use a Grounding-DINO-based pseudo-mask generation pipeline that converts local artifact descriptions from training explanations into weak patch- level supervision for an Artifact Evidence Map. We further introduce a local patch-level contrastive objective that separates artifact and authenticity evidence in the detector feature space without requiring paired images or pixel-level manipulation masks. For language output, we use class-conditional Qwen3-VL models to generate complex explanations for fake and real predictions, followed by a GRPO-optimized text simplification model. The proposed methods were trained and evaluated on the challenge subset of XPlainVerse. On the full test split, our submission achieves 0.9349 detection accuracy, 0.5571 explanation score, and a 0.7456 final challenge score.

Wed 7 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Fake images made by AI can look very real, which makes it hard to tell if a photo is real or fake. The authors created a system that not only detects fake images accurately but also highlights the parts of the image that show evidence of manipulation. Their method uses multiple AI models working together to recognize subtle clues and then explains its decisions in simple and detailed language. This helps people understand why the image was flagged as fake or real.
Open → 2610.09952v1

Reddit hate narratives isolated by clustering entity based evaluations

Look What You Made Us Cluster: Hate Narrative Extraction from Reddit Discourse

Abstract: Narrative extraction allows us to identify online hate narratives, supporting the construction of rigorous detection systems. Existing computational approaches, however, are limited in precision as they rely on semantic representations, which tend to capture only surface-level meaning. To detect more precise and interpretable narratives, we present an extraction pipeline that represents narratives as entity-evaluation pairs. Narratives are extracted using a Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning process that extends Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis, identifying the aspect, classifying its judgement type as the basis for evaluation, and deriving the evaluation accordingly. Extracted narratives are then clustered using Leiden, following which clusters are resolved to an intended level of granularity through an LLM-guided refinement process. We illustrate this narrative pipeline with English Reddit comments from 2024 that criticize Taylor Swift, analyzing a representative cluster that exhibits hate speech patterns to demonstrate its interpretive value.

Tue 29 SeptComputation and LanguageSocial and Information Networks
The gist
The authors focus on detecting hate narratives on Reddit more precisely by looking at not just words but who or what is being talked about and how they are judged. They created a process that uses a large AI language model to identify pairs of entities and evaluations, then groups similar narratives together to better understand hate speech patterns. This method was demonstrated with posts criticizing Taylor Swift, showing how it can reveal clear hate speech narratives. This approach aims to provide clearer, more interpretable analysis of online hate than previous methods that only looked at surface meaning.
Open → 2609.37408v1

Key factors that improve detection of fake text and image claims

What Improves Multimodal Misinformation Detection? Answers from a Large-Scale Empirical Study

Abstract: Multimodal misinformation is increasingly crafted to look convincing by pairing a textual claim with an image that appears to "prove" it. Yet in practice, building effective detectors often hinges on a small set of design choices that are rarely examined in a controlled way. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale study of multimodal design choices for misinformation detection with over 3,375 experiments- spanning three benchmark datasets and a broad range of pre-trained vision and language backbones. Through systematic comparisons and targeted robustness analyses, we distill practical guidance on which design choices help, when do they fail silently, and what aspects of the pipeline most strongly shape model behavior, answering 4 key Research Questions (RQs). We aim to provide a reliable foundation for designing stronger and more dependable multimodal misinformation detection systems, thus contributing to the broader research community.

Thu 24 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceComputation and Language
The gist
Misinformation often combines false text with an image to look believable. The authors studied thousands of experiments to find which parts of the detection process really matter. They identified design choices that help or sometimes fail silently when finding fake news that mixes images and words. Their work gives clear advice on building stronger systems to spot these tricky fakes.
Open → 2609.30402v1

New geopolitical conflict reshapes attention and participation in Bluesky

Competing for a Finite Pool of Attention in Social Media? How a New Geopolitical Conflict Reshapes Engagement in Bluesky

Abstract: Major geopolitical crises can rapidly reshape online public attention. Yet population-level increases in discussion volume about a new crisis reveal little about how users accommodate this new demand for attention. We study the onset of the Iran-US-Israel conflict, triggered on 28 February 2026, using longitudinal repost activity from Bluesky across four consecutive approximately three-month windows spanning the period before and after its onset; the data comprise 91.0 million unique posts and 645.5 million repost observations. We find that the new conflict reorganized participation through both reallocation among existing conflict participants and substantial activation of previously low-conflict-active users, while some previously active users reduced their conflict-related participation. Attention redistribution differed substantially across pre-existing interests: Iran-US-Israel and Israel-Palestine attention showed strong positive co-movement with little systematic relative replacement, whereas Other Political and Non-Political content more consistently lost attention share, and Russia-Ukraine exhibited weaker, heterogeneous replacement. Finally, disruption of users' broader attention allocation was substantially more prevalent among users with established attention to geopolitical conflicts than in the overall or Non-Political populations. Together, these findings show that a newly emerging conflict reorganizes online attention through turnover in who participates, selective co-attendance or replacement across topics, and disruption of broader attention patterns concentrated among users already engaged with geopolitical conflicts.

Thu 17 SeptSocial and Information Networks
The gist
When a new geopolitical conflict started in early 2026, the way people discussed topics on the social media platform Bluesky changed a lot. The authors looked at billions of reposts before and after the conflict began. They found that some users who rarely discussed conflicts started joining in, while some regular participants pulled back. Also, people interested in related conflicts tended to shift their attention together, but non-political content lost some focus. Overall, long-time conflict followers showed more change in what they paid attention to than other users.
Open → 2609.20101v1

Measuring online attention over time by persistence recency and re-emergence

Measuring Time-Horizon Engagement Effectiveness: Persistence, Recency, and Re-Emergence

Abstract: Online attention is commonly summarized using cumulative volume, peak activity, or arithmetic averages, but such measures can obscure differences between activity that is sustained over time, concentrated near the present, or renewed after dormancy. This paper introduces the Time-Horizon Engagement Effectiveness (TH-EE) framework, which constructs interpretable temporal profiles of online attention by distinguishing three related but non-equivalent properties: persistence, recency, and re-emergence. We evaluate the framework through controlled engagement traces, a proof-of-concept application to 1,850 YouTube videos across 37 topics (18 cohorts selected a priori as exemplars of persistent, acute, cyclical, and recently originating attention, and 19 cohorts corresponding to authoritatively debunked claims), and an event-level validation on eleven years of daily Wikipedia pageview series for the same topics. The controlled analyses show that the framework distinguishes distributed activity from concentrated bursts, introduces temporal-order sensitivity through recency weighting, and identifies renewed activity after a defined dormant interval. On the event-level series, the framework's reactivations co-locate with Kleinberg burst onsets, and PELT change points far more often than chance. The YouTube application shows that debunked-claim cohorts do not occupy a unique region of temporal-profile space; they exhibit heterogeneous patterns that overlap substantially with benign topics. These results support treating persistence, recency, and re-emergence as separate dimensions of online attention. TH-EE is a descriptive and comparative measurement framework, not a classifier of misinformation, coordination, intent, or content veracity.

Sun 13 SeptSocial and Information NetworksComputers and Society
The gist
People usually look at online attention by counting how much activity happens overall or at the peak, but this misses important details about timing. This paper introduces a way to track attention by focusing on how long it lasts (persistence), how recent it is (recency), and whether it comes back after a break (re-emergence). The authors tested their approach on YouTube videos and Wikipedia page views to show it reveals different patterns of attention that typical measures hide. They also found that false claims online don't have a unique attention pattern, showing these time-based aspects matter separately.
Open → 2609.14474v1

Multilingual dataset helps detect russian propaganda in search results

SWARM: A Multilingual Human-Annotated Dataset for Russian Propaganda Detection in Search Engine Results

Abstract: Russian state propaganda spreads across many languages and online spaces. Yet, most computational work examines only one such space, usually social media, in one or two languages, and analyses sources rather than content. We introduce SWARM (Search-Web documents Annotated for Russian propaganda, Multilingual), a dataset of 2,183 search engine results across nine languages and diverse web domains (e.g., news, blogs, government sites), each annotated by trained coders for whether it supports a recurring Russian propaganda narrative. We benchmark a source-based blocklist, supervised classifiers, and zero-shot LLMs against these labels. The blocklist misses most propaganda-supporting documents, because such content is not confined to flagged "propaganda" outlets but also appears on mainstream ones. Content-level analysis helps, though how much depends on the model: the strongest LLM reaches a positive-class F1 of 0.73, whereas the supervised classifiers reach only about 0.5, with the smaller LLMs over-predicting support, mistaking topical relevance for endorsement. Detecting search-borne propaganda thus requires per-language, content-level evaluation, which we hope SWARM and our evaluation code enable.

Fri 11 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Russian propaganda appears in many languages and on various websites, not just on known propaganda sources. The authors created SWARM, a dataset of search engine results in nine languages, each marked by experts for Russian propaganda content. They tested different ways to detect such propaganda and found that analyzing the content itself works better than just blocking certain sources. However, success depends on the model used, with some mistakes caused by confusing the topic of a page with support for propaganda.
Open → 2609.12653v1