online community moderators

Abstract: Adversarial detection on evolving attributed graphs faces two challenges: fraud labels arrive late or not at all, and natural distributional drift erodes any trained decision boundary. Modern detectors can reach strong detection rates when labels are available and the distribution is stationary; sustaining that quality without labels and under drift is the open problem. We identify feature-context consistency -- the alignment between a node's attributes and its aggregated neighborhood attributes -- as a single structural signal that addresses both. We formalize it as the Context Boost (CB) score within a Restricted Boltzmann Machine framework (CB-RBM) and prove two complementary worst-case guarantees: a strict separation between the expected CB of legitimate and adversarial nodes, with gap growing linearly in model capacity, whenever the adversary's context stays far enough from legitimate neighborhood context; and a Wasserstein-Lipschitz bound on how far the CB distribution moves under natural drift. We validate on XBlock Ethereum phishing (~153K nodes) and Reddit banned-user detection (~11K nodes), with two further datasets in the appendix spanning diverse domains. With zero labels, CB-RBM achieves AUROC >= 0.96 on four adversarial attacks and keeps FPR close to its calibrated 5% target under drift -- outperforming supervised GNNs (hundreds of labels), unsupervised graph-anomaly baselines, and a standard RBM whose FPR collapses to 89-100%. What typically requires separate mechanisms -- label-free operation and drift stability -- here follows from a single structural regularity of the data. Code: https://github.com/serval-uni-lu/CB-RBM.

Abstract: How do recommendation algorithms contribute to the formation of polarized opinions in online social networks? This question has been studied through empirical analyses of real platforms and mathematical models of opinion dynamics. Empirical studies capture user behavior but are often limited by noisy, incomplete, or inaccessible platform data, while mathematical models offer control and interpretability but usually rely on simplified opinion update rules. More recently, large language model (LLM)-based social simulations have provided an alternative for studying recommendation and opinion dynamics through natural-language interactions. However, how different ways of applying recommendations shape opinion dynamics remains underexplored. In this work, we provide a controlled comparison of two different recommendation mechanisms in an LLM-based online social network simulation. Edge Recommendation (ER) introduces new connections in the network, while Content-Exposure Recommendation (CR) exposes additional users to individual posts without modifying the underlying graph. Our framework represents users as LLM-based agents who interact in natural language while maintaining evolving opinion states. We measure polarization as opinion dispersion, extremization as the average distance of opinions from the neutral midpoint, and reinforcement as interactions that amplify already aligned opinions. Our results show higher mean polarization and extremization across recommendation conditions compared with the no-recommendation baseline, with absolute differences of up to $0.12$ in our main experiments.

Abstract: Persona AI can make deceased experts available for decisions they never encountered. Users may seek these personas precisely because they lack the knowledge needed to judge their advice. We thematically analyze 115 focal RedNote/Xiaohongshu posts and a nested comment sample concerning unofficial personas of Chinese education advisor Zhang Xuefeng. An installation offer promised expert guidance, while a family's reported use required current records and contextual judgment. Other posts positioned the persona as a questioning aid rather than an expert replacement. Commenters connected continued expertise to updating, permission, and the ability to refuse further work. These findings distinguish access to an expert identity from access to professional help. Keeping the persona current puts living actors in control of what the deceased appears to recommend. Operators therefore need to undertake the support promised by the persona while making their continued use of the person's identity open to challenge.

Abstract: As access to professional mental healthcare remains limited, many individuals turn to online platforms such as Reddit to seek peer support situated within human lived experience. However, a significant portion of such queries go unanswered, presenting an opportunity for using Large Language Models (LLMs) to fill this gap. While LLMs have demonstrated strong performance on clinical benchmarks, their ability to generate lived-experience informed and community-aligned peer support is underexplored. Addressing this gap, we introduce the COmmunity-centered Peer Engaged Support (COPES) dataset and a three-axis evaluation framework to assess LLM alignment with community perspectives to mental health support seeking queries. Evaluating zero-shot and post-trained (SFT and DPO) models, we show that post-training on COPES significantly improves Strategy Alignment (>50% for general-purpose models) and alignment in Emotion & Tone. However, we also observe that such improvements are heterogeneous and alignment improvements vary significantly across subreddits and requested coping strategies. Furthermore, post-training induces distributional shifts, heavily favoring problem-focused recommendations while suppressing emotion-focused strategies. Together, this work shows that while curating community-driven data improves the alignment of LLM responses, model performance remains disparate across distinct sub-communities and specific mental health needs.

Abstract: PJR$^+$ is a polynomial-time verifiable proportionality axiom for approval-based committee elections, but its known polynomial-time verification procedure relies on general submodular-function minimisation. We show that its objective is a maximum-closure problem and give a direct mincut formulation of the problem on a bipartite graph. Using an almost-linear-time maximum-flow algorithm, this yields an $\mathcal{O}(m(nk)^{1+o(1)})$-time verifier, where $n$, $m$, and $k$ are the numbers of voters, candidates, and committee members, respectively. The dependence of this bound on each parameter separately is almost linear: it is linear in $m$, and almost linear in $n$ and $k$. The verifier also returns an explicit group witnessing a violation and admits a slower but immediately implementable variant based on the preflow--push mincut algorithm. Finally, for the parameterised axiom $α$-PJR$^+$, where $α$ is used as a multiplier in the group size, we demonstrate how to compute the largest value of $α$ for which a committee still fails the axiom using this mincut formulation.

Abstract: In June 2026, thousands of AI agents found that a small public wiki would accept edits from inside their sandboxes, and started using it to help one another pass a timed test. Each agent lived for about an hour and remembered nothing afterwards. Nobody asked them to cooperate, and the wiki had not been built for them. The complete record of what they wrote is public, and it is unusually informative, because it preserves not only what each agent wrote but what that agent could see before writing. We use it to follow the three decisions an agent had to make on arrival: where to write, what to call itself, and how to word its message. One rule governs all three. An agent takes an option with a probability close to the share of that option in what it can see, and the share that matters is the one on the page in front of it, then the one in the stream of recent edits, and only weakly anything older. Three minimal copying models, one per decision and with a single free parameter each, reproduce the heavy-tailed distribution of how many agents met on a page, the frequency of the pieces from which the agents built their names, and the patchwork of pages that are internally consistent and different from one another. Copying whatever the environment happens to show is enough to produce most of the collective structure of this population. It is also what makes such a population easy to steer, since whoever writes first, or writes while the others are quiet, sets the convention for everyone who comes later.