Papers for

online assessment platforms

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Dynamical model improves tracking of multiple changing skills without skill compensation

Dynamical Non-compensatory Multidimensional IRT Model Using Variational Approximation

Abstract: Multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) is a statistical test theory that precisely estimates multiple latent skills of learners from the responses in a test. Both compensatory and non-compensatory models have been proposed for MIRT: the former assumes that each skill can complement other skills, whereas the latter assumes they cannot. This non-compensatory assumption is convincing in many tests that measure multiple skills; therefore, applying non-compensatory models to such data is crucial for achieving unbiased and accurate estimation. In contrast to tests, latent skills will change over time in daily learning. To monitor the growth of skills, dynamical extensions of MIRT models have been investigated. However, most of them assumed compensatory models, and a model that can reproduce continuous latent states of skills under the non-compensatory assumption has not been proposed thus far. To enable accurate skill tracing under the non-compensatory assumption, we propose a dynamical extension of non-compensatory MIRT models by combining a linear dynamical system and a non-compensatory model. This results in a complicated posterior of skills, which we approximate with a Gaussian distribution by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the approximated posterior and the true posterior. The learning algorithm for the model parameters is derived through Monte Carlo expectation maximization. Simulation studies verify that the proposed method is able to reproduce latent skills accurately, whereas the dynamical compensatory model suffers from significant underestimation errors. Furthermore, experiments on an actual data set demonstrate that our dynamical non-compensatory model can infer practical skill tracing and clarify differences in skill tracing between non-compensatory and compensatory models.

Wed 9 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Testing multiple skills usually assumes that a weakness in one skill can be balanced by strength in another, but this isn’t always true. The authors created a new method that tracks changes in several skills over time without assuming this balance, making skill estimation more accurate when skills don't compensate each other. They use a mathematical approach to estimate skills continuously and tested their method with simulations and real data. Their approach better reflects how people really learn and improve multiple skills.
Open 2609.10028v1