Papers for

online ad schedulers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Constrained online optimization achieves low regret with minimal violations

$\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ Regret and Polylogarithmic Constraint Violation for COCO

Abstract: We study constrained online convex optimization with adversarial convex losses and constraints ($\mathsf{COCO}$). At each round \(t\in[T]\), a learner selects \(x_t\) from a \(d\)-dimensional convex decision set \(\mathcal X\), after which an adaptive adversary reveals a convex cost function \(f_t\) and constraint function \(g_t\). Consequently, the learner incurs cost \(f_t(x_t)\) and constraint violation \(\max\{0,g_t(x_t)\}\), and aims to simultaneously minimize regret and cumulative constraint violation ($\mathsf{CCV}$) over the entire horizon. Existing algorithms achieve \(O(\sqrt{T})\) regret and \(\widetilde O(\sqrt{T})\) $\mathsf{CCV}$. We show that an online policy can achieve \(O(\sqrt{T\log T})\) regret and \(O(\log^2 T)\) $\mathsf{CCV}$, reducing the $\mathsf{CCV}$ from polynomial to polylogarithmic while retaining near-optimal regret. Our approach combines continuous Hedge with elimination on shrinking feasible sets. The key observation is that whenever the mean of the Hedge distribution violates a constraint, Grünbaum's inequality guarantees that a constant fraction of the Hedge probability mass is eliminated. We use an adaptive learning-rate schedule and a potential function coupling the surviving volume with the learning rate to convert this probability-mass reduction into a bound of \(O(\log^2 T)\) on the $\mathsf{CCV}$.

Fri 2 OctMachine Learning
The gist
The paper looks at a way to make decisions step-by-step when faced with changing rules and costs, aiming to do nearly as well as the best fixed choice, while rarely breaking constraints. The authors improve prior work by showing it’s possible to keep the number of rule violations very low—growing only slowly with time—without sacrificing performance. They do this by cleverly trimming down options when constraints are broken, which quickly reduces problematic choices. Their method balances learning and constraints better than before.
Open → 2610.03983v1

Prophet inequalities improved for complex online match selection problems

Prophet Inequalities and Online Contention Resolution for Matchoids

Abstract: In the classical prophet inequality, an algorithm observes a sequence of random variables with known distributions in an online fashion, and it must select one of the random variables with the goal of maximizing the expected value of its selection. The performance of the algorithm is compared to an \textit{omniscient prophet} who observes all of the random variables before having to make its selection. Combinatorial extensions of the classical prophet inequality in which the algorithm gets to pick a subset of the random variables (constrained to belong to some family of feasible sets) have been studied extensively. We study prophet inequalities with a $k$-matchoid constraint (a common generalization of a $k$-matroid intersection constraint and a $k$-bounded hypergraph matching constraint) in two common online arrival models. We give guarantees with respect to the \textit{ex-ante} fractional relaxation of the omniscient prophet, obtaining an ex-ante competitive ratio of $\frac{1}{k+1}$ in the adversarial order case, and $\frac{1-e^{-k}}{k}$ in the random order case. Using the duality framework of Lee and Singla \cite{Lee2018}, this also yields online contention resolution schemes in these settings. Our adversarial-order prophet inequality can be viewed as a generalization of a recent $\frac12$-competitive matroid prophet inequality by Kalantarzadeh and Pashkovich, 2026. This generalization introduces a new framework: coordinated weighted principal partitions across multiple matroids. Our random-order prophet inequality is a generalization of the $k=1$ matroid case of Lee and Singla, 2018. The two results improve previously known competitive ratios for $k$-matroid intersection, which were $\frac{1}{(e+o(1))k}$ and $\frac{1}{k+1}$, respectively.

Thu 17 SeptData Structures and Algorithms
The gist
The paper looks at how to pick the best items from a sequence when you only see them one by one, aiming to get close to the best possible choice if you could see them all at once. The authors study this problem under complicated rules for which sets of items can be chosen, called k-matchoid constraints, which generalize several known constraints. They provide new algorithms with better performance guarantees for different ways the items can arrive. These results also enable new ways to handle conflicts when multiple selections happen simultaneously online.
Open → 2609.20939v1