Papers for

oil and gas exploration teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Self-supervised model predicts marine sediment properties better than expert labels

Expert lithological labels do not improve learning when used to predict marine sediment properties

Abstract: Scientific drilling has produced large archives of physical, chemical and magnetic measurements linked to descriptions of the rock recovered. These archives are mostly incomplete: instruments sample at different intervals, recovery is partial, and destructive analyses preclude later measurement of the same material. We train an self-supervised embedding model on the LILY ocean drilling database using six routinely logged properties (bulk density, magnetic susceptibility, natural gamma radiation, and red, green and blue reflectance) across 236,963 observations from 296 boreholes, with a masked variational autoencoder that has a heteroscedastic Gaussian decoder and learnable mask tokens. The embeddings separate geologist-assigned lithologies as well as a variant trained with those labels, and increasing the weight on the labels degrades reconstruction while leaving classification unchanged. The labels are recoverable from the measurements geologists use to assign them, so training on them adds nothing. Lithological categories compress continuous measurements into classes, and compressing them discards what the measurements record about the processes that produced the rock. The embeddings also predict physical properties that were absent from training, on boreholes the model has never seen. While depth should account for this since sediments compact with burial, it does not. On held-out boreholes depth alone reaches a median $R^2$ of -0.02, against 0.20 for the embedding.

Mon 26 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Marine scientists often label rock samples by type to understand the environment they came from. This paper shows that using these expert labels doesn’t help a computer model learn about the rocks better than using raw physical measurements alone. The researchers trained a model to represent rock properties from many measurements without relying on the rock type labels. Their model can predict some sediment characteristics in new drill cores more accurately than just using depth information or the expert labels.
Open → 2610.36410v1

Structure-aware Bayesian inversion improves subsurface imaging with diffusion models

Structure-aware Bayesian full waveform inversion via diffusion-regularized Stein variational gradient descent

Abstract: Full waveform inversion (FWI) is a powerful tool for high-resolution subsurface model reconstruction, but it remains highly nonlinear and ill-posed, especially when the initial model is inaccurate or the acquired data are noisy and incomplete. Annealed Stein variational gradient descent (ASVGD) provides a particle-based Bayesian framework for FWI by approximating the posterior distribution with an ensemble of velocity models, thereby enabling uncertainty quantification beyond a single deterministic solution. However, conventional ASVGD-FWI commonly relies on simple handcrafted priors, such as Gaussian or smoothing assumptions, which are often insufficient to represent complex geological structures. To address this limitation, we introduce a learned diffusion model (DM) as an implicit regularization mechanism within the ASVGD-FWI framework. Instead of explicitly evaluating the diffusion prior density, the trained diffusion model acts as a learned geological projection operator that guides updated particles toward the distribution of plausible velocity models. In this way, the proposed method combines data consistency from FWI, posterior diversity from ASVGD, and structural realism from the diffusion prior. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the diffusion-regularized ASVGD-FWI produces more geologically consistent mean models, suppresses nonphysical artifacts, and yields uncertainty estimates that are more concentrated around structurally complex and poorly constrained regions. These results suggest that learned diffusion priors can effectively enhance Bayesian FWI by improving both inversion stability and the interpretability of posterior uncertainty.

Tue 13 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Finding underground structures accurately is hard when starting points are off or data is messy. The authors use a technique that keeps many possible models at once to understand uncertainty better. They add a smart tool that learns realistic underground shapes to guide these models, making the results more believable and less noisy. Their method helps create clearer pictures of underground structures and better shows where uncertainty is highest.
Open → 2610.19187v1

Neural operator improves subsurface velocity model updates in inversion

Full Waveform Inversion with a Learned Preconditioner

Abstract: Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a powerful approach for reconstructing subsurface velocity models, but its practical performance is limited by ill-conditioning, sensitivity to the update direction, and the high cost of curvature-based methods. In this project, we investigate whether a neural operator trained on reverse-time-migration (RTM) images can provide a useful learned preconditioner for FWI. We compare projected FWI against neural-preconditioned FWI using either a standard Fourier neural operator (FNO) or a Jacobian-informed FNO (JI-FNO). The neural preconditioner applies the normal operator of the learned RTM map to modify the true Devito FWI gradient. Our experiments show that the JI-FNO preconditioner achieves the lowest model error while maintaining data-residual decay comparable to baseline projected FWI. In contrast, the standard FNO preconditioner is unstable and gives worse model recovery, despite using the same neural-preconditioning framework. We also identify a failure mode of a nonlinear neural Gauss Newton-type inner solve: directly matching the neural RTM output to the FWI gradient creates an objective-space mismatch and does not yield a reliable descent direction. These results suggest that forward RTM-image prediction alone is insufficient for learned preconditioning; accurate learned derivatives and objective-consistent use of the neural operator are critical for producing useful inversion updates.

Sun 11 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Building accurate underground maps can be tricky because the math involved is tough and slow. The authors looked at whether a special kind of AI called a neural operator could help speed up and improve this process. They found that a version of this AI that understands certain math details works better than simpler ones, helping to get more reliable underground pictures. However, just predicting images with AI isn’t enough; the AI also needs to use math correctly to guide the improvements.
Open → 2610.15331v1

Depth-progressive seismic velocity modeling with 2d diffusion networks

Depth-progressive 3D seismic velocity model building via 2D generative diffusion models

Abstract: Three-dimensional (3D) velocity model building (VMB) remains computationally challenging with conventional approaches and native 3D neural networks, largely due to the prohibitive memory and training cost of full 3D formulations. Therefore, we introduce a depth-progressive framework that achieves 3D VMB using 2D generative diffusion models through a depth-as-channel formulation, in which the depth dimension of each 3D velocity patch is mapped to the channel dimension of a 2D U-Net. This allows the model to synthesize overlapping depth patches sequentially from shallow to deep while conditioning the prediction of the deeper patch on the shallower one, as well as on any available geophysical constraints, including well logs and structural attributes. During training, paired shallow-deep patch pairs with randomized overlaps are used to teach the network how deeper velocity structures relate to shallower information, and a classifier-free guidance strategy enables the model to handle missing constraints gracefully. At inference, starting from a shallow velocity prior, the model recursively generates deeper patches in a top-down manner, and a depth-attenuated Gaussian blending scheme merges overlapping predictions into spatially coherent 3D volumes while accounting for the progressive accumulation of uncertainty at greater depths. Numerical experiments on both in-distribution benchmark models, including Overthrust, SEAM Arid, and SEG/EAGE, and the out-of-distribution Marmousi model demonstrate that the method effectively propagates shallow velocity priors downward and produces high-quality 3D velocity volumes across a range of geological settings and conditioning scenarios. Compared to a 3D benchmark of equivalent architecture, the proposed method significantly reduces parameter count, training cost, and inference cost, while maintaining superior VMB accuracy.

Sat 10 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Building 3D models of underground rock speeds is hard because these models need lots of computer power. The authors created a method that treats the depth dimension like extra color channels in a 2D image, letting them use less expensive 2D networks instead of full 3D ones. Their approach builds the model layer by layer from shallow areas to deeper ones, using information from above and other data to help predictions. Tests showed this method is more efficient and accurate than traditional 3D models across different geological settings.
Open → 2610.14812v1

Ai helps speed up geological fault and horizon interpretation

An AI-assisted conditioning and geological interpretation workflow for usage in implicit geological modeling

Abstract: Implicit modeling and Relative Geologic Time are geological modeling techniques that enable more efficient, faster, less biased and more reproducible modeling results. For optimal operation, these techniques require many well-constrained input data. In the framework of the Horizon Europe GO-Forward and MOOI WarmingUP GOO projects and to accelerate Implicit modeling, Machine Learning (ML) methods have been tested and implemented in a toolkit for the interpretation of (onshore) seismic data from the shallow to deep range (+- 300 - 3500 m). The goal is to rapidly characterise this depth domain by efficient interpretation of horizons and faults in seismic data. The first step is to improve the signal by applying AI techniques like self-supervised and semi-supervised contrastive learning CNN's for noise reduction and interpolation. Next, horizons and faults are interpreted with minimal use of human-generated training data by using (semi-) self-supervised methods. The resulting developed toolkit supports the application of the implemented algorithms in an efficient workflow. As a first demonstration, the top of the Dutch Maassluis Formation has been interpreted in the Leeuwarden and Waalwijk 3D seismic cubes. Overall, this study demonstrates that AI-assisted interpretation workflows have reached a level of maturity that allows their integration into applied geological modeling and decision-making.

Wed 7 OctArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Geologists often study underground layers and faults using seismic data, but interpreting this data can be slow and sometimes biased. The authors show how artificial intelligence can improve this process by cleaning up noisy data and automatically identifying important layers and faults with very little human input. They demonstrate their approach on real 3D seismic data from the Netherlands. This work shows that AI tools have now become reliable enough to be part of everyday geological modeling and decision-making.
Open → 2610.09871v1

Physically grounded model improves seismic and well data matching

Physical Cross-Modal Masked Autoencoding for Seismic-to-Well Representation Learning

Abstract: Learning from scientific measurements often requires aligning modalities with different spatial support and resolution. Subsurface characterization is an extreme dense-sparse problem in which 3D seismic provides volumetric but indirect measurements and well logs provide high-resolution 1D measurements at sparse borehole locations. We introduce a physically grounded cross-modal masked autoencoder (CM-MAE) for seismic-to-well representation learning. The model jointly tokenizes seismic volumes and well-log depth patches, embeds both modalities in continuous physical coordinates using four-axis rotary position embeddings, and reconstructs masked targets with a cross-modal decoder. Sparse Mixture-of-Experts layers provide modality-specific capacity while dense attention allows information exchange between modalities. Pretraining uses 23 seismic volumes covering approximately 178,000 square km across U.S. offshore and onshore basins, together with approximately 92,000 wells. Matched-mask ablations show strongly asymmetric information flow. Seismic context improves held-out well-log reconstruction by 9.73%, while well-log context improves seismic reconstruction by 0.65%. We evaluate seismic-only pseudo-log predictions against independent interpreter-drawn salt-geobody masks to determine whether they contain geologic signal. Across offshore U.S. surveys, compressional-slowness-derived salt scores reach an AUROC of 0.910. In onshore basins, predicted compressional slowness preserves formation-scale structure and partial relative organization in an unseen survey despite calibration drift. CM-MAE learns useful seismic-to-well representations under extreme modality asymmetry, although absolute pseudo-log calibration remains survey-dependent.

Mon 28 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Seismic surveys give broad, low-detail pictures of underground formations, while wells provide detailed but very localized data. The authors developed a new computer model that learns to connect these very different types of data by looking at both together, improving predictions about one from the other. Their approach uses a special way to represent location and focuses on reconstructing missing data from one type using clues from the other. They tested this on extensive U.S. seismic and well data, showing the model can better predict well measurements from seismic data and capture geological structures like salt formations, even in new regions.
Open → 2609.36193v1