nlp developers

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with temporally grounded reasoning because their static parametric memory is misaligned with the dynamic evolution of real-world knowledge. Although RAG and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) provide practical ways to enhance LLMs, they remain insufficient for temporal reasoning. Existing retrieval methods typically prioritize semantic relevance while overlooking temporal validity, event order, and evolutionary dependencies, resulting in evidence that is relevant in isolation but temporally fragmented. Meanwhile, conventional PEFT methods usually employ fixed and input-agnostic low-rank updates, making it difficult to capture time-dependent entity semantics and relation drift. To address these limitations, we propose Temporal Evidence-Parameter Co-Alignment (TEPCA), a framework for LLM reasoning over TKGs. TEPCA aligns LLM reasoning with temporal knowledge at both the evidence and parameter levels. At the evidence level, it introduces time-constrained Dynamic Relevance-Guided Path (DRGP) pruning to preserve globally coherent temporal paths, together with Mutual-Information (MI)-based pruning to retain query-informative local facts under temporal constraints. At the parameter level, it integrates Dynamic-Gated LoRA (DG-LoRA), a timestamp-conditioned low-rank adaptation mechanism that dynamically modulates the effective adaptation subspace according to temporal context. This design enables LLMs to better capture fine-grained entity evolution and time-dependent relation semantics while preserving parameter efficiency. Experimental results on two TKG benchmarks demonstrate that TEPCA achieves state-of-the-art performance. Additional evaluations of DG-LoRA on eight commonsense QA datasets further verify its general input-adaptive capacity, scalability across LLM backbones, and interpretability.

Abstract: Recent progress in large language model reasoning has been driven by benchmarks and reinforcement learning environments with automatically verifiable rewards, particularly in mathematics, code, and formal logic. These settings make model accuracy easier to evaluate and optimize, but it remains unclear how far success under fixed problem specifications and stable evaluation criteria transfers to reasoning outside such domains. Real-world reasoning often proceeds under incomplete and revisable information: conclusions may be supported provisionally, defeated by counter-evidence, reinstated by further arguments, or revised when stronger reasons become available. Reasoning of this kind is generally referred to as defeasible reasoning. We introduce ArgGYM, a procedural benchmark and RLVR-compatible training environment for structured defeasible reasoning. ArgGYM decomposes this reasoning into twelve tasks and grounds task-specific scoring in a symbolic argumentation engine that computes the formal states used to evaluate model outputs. It includes a frozen benchmark of 1,440 verified instances across fifteen curriculum configurations, two argument preference orderings (weakest-link and last-link), and two set orderings (elitist and democratic), while the same generators and verifiers can produce fresh instances for evaluation that reduces dependence on static test sets and for verifiable-reward training. On the frozen benchmark, frontier and open-weight models show sharply different reasoning profiles: they can recover substantial parts of structured answers without solving the complete task, and performance declines in later curriculum configurations with longer dependencies and more interacting structures. We release the benchmark, generators, and verifiers for reproducible evaluation and RLVR training.

Abstract: In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in Cultural NLP, with substantial efforts to create globally inclusive NLP systems. The rapid growth of literature in this field makes it difficult to track trends in methods and data resources. To address this, we analyze over 375 papers to answer three complementary questions: (1) What Cultural Capabilities (CCs) are being targeted in NLP systems? (2) How are cultural data resources being created? and (3) What methods are being used to improve the CCs of those systems? We discuss trends observed across the three questions, and identify relevant research gaps. To facilitate further research in this field, we release our full list of analyzed papers in the form of an interactive web interface, which includes a feature to allow researchers to add their work; we hope this facilitates future research and proves to be a valuable resource for the Cultural NLP community.

Abstract: Modern Vision-Language Retrieval-Augmented Generation (VLRAG) systems augment Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) with retrieved visual and textual evidence, enabling responses grounded in external knowledge. However, the retrieval pipeline also creates an attack surface: adversaries can inject poisoned image-text pairs into the knowledge corpus to influence model outputs. Existing knowledge poisoning attacks are typically always-on, allowing poisoned evidence to affect generation whenever it is retrieved. This lack of precise activation control makes it difficult to confine malicious behavior to intended inputs, reducing both attack stealth and effectiveness. In this paper, we propose ViTeGate, a visual-textual triggered knowledge poisoning attack for VLRAG systems. ViTeGate uses a visual trigger to conditionally promote poisoned evidence into retrieval results and a textual trigger to induce an attacker-specified response from the retrieved evidence. By coordinating retrieval and generation, ViTeGate reduces poison exposure when the visual trigger is absent and preserves normal responses when the textual trigger is absent. The two-trigger design enables selective attack activation and reduces unintended single-trigger activation. Experiments across multiple query datasets, retrievers, and LVLMs validate the effectiveness of ViTeGate. On InfoSeek, ViTeGate achieves an attack success rate of up to 0.98 while maintaining a clean answer accuracy of up to 0.93.