news verification teams

Abstract: Semantic misinformation can arise when an authentic image is paired with a caption that changes or distorts its narrative. Because the image itself may contain no visible signs of manipulation, methods designed to detect pixel-level artifacts can miss these misleading image-caption pairs. We study this problem using DGM4+, a dataset designed to evaluate the detection of global scene and semantic inconsistencies. We propose a multimodal model that combines image-text representations from SigLIP with visual scene features from DINOv2 through a projection MLP, and adapts Qwen2-VL-7B using LoRA. The model jointly predicts whether an image-caption pair is authentic, identifies the manipulation type, and grounds the misleading caption tokens. On the DGM4+ validation split, the model achieves an F1 score of $0.9679$ for binary authenticity classification. These results suggest that parameter-efficient adaptation of vision-language models is promising for detecting semantic inconsistencies, while also motivating further work on precise token-level grounding.

Abstract: Advances in image generation have made visual authenticity increasingly difficult to assess. Although image forensics now examines both generation artifacts and higher-level visual inconsistencies, a plausible image can still contradict real-world facts or rules. We introduce WorldFact-Bench to evaluate image-world consistency from a single image, without a predefined claim or verification target. The benchmark contains 1,274 source-aligned real-fake pairs across four verification regimes and ten semantic domains. Each pair introduces a specific, evidence-supported factual conflict while seeking to preserve non-target content and visual plausibility. Images are evaluated independently, and pair accuracy requires both members of a pair to be classified correctly. We further propose PERSIST-Agent, which organizes iterative verification around a persistent state linking candidate facts, visual observations, evidence, and verification statuses. This state guides subsequent inspection and retrieval while retaining unresolved candidates. With backbone weights fixed, harness self-optimization refines the agent's prompts and execution rules through validation feedback. Experiments reveal strong label biases in several detectors and uneven gains from retrieval. On the evaluated 8B backbones, PERSIST-Agent improves pair accuracy over both direct judgment and retrieval-augmented baselines, while ablations support the role of persistent verification state. These findings highlight the value of state-guided verification and the remaining gap between visual plausibility and factual correctness.

Abstract: Multimodal rumor detectors increasingly rely on retrieved evidence, yet relevant evidence is not necessarily sufficient for verification. Missing provenance, duplicated reports, and unresolved contradictions can produce confident predictions without adequate support. We introduce SAFE-MR, a framework that separates claim veracity from evidence sufficiency. The method decomposes image-text posts into verifiable claims, constructs a relation-aware claim-evidence graph, and aggregates evidence using provenance and contextual compatibility. Separate veracity and sufficiency heads support selective prediction, while evidence interventions encourage stability under irrelevant additions and sensitivity to evidence removal. On NewsCLIPpings, VERITE, and XFacta, SAFE-MR achieves macro-F1 scores of 91.2%, 75.8%, and 85.2%, respectively. Against the matched backbone with evidence, its macro-F1 gains are 2.2, 4.9, and 4.8 percentage points. On the diagnostic selection set, SAFE-MR reduces AURC from 0.105 for maximum-probability rejection to 0.075 and lowers error at 80% coverage from 13.8% to 8.5%. Evidence-perturbation and ablation results support the role of sufficiency learning and intervention training in improving selective verification.

Abstract: Claims paired with AI-generated images are a rapidly growing form of misinformation. Existing automated fact-checking (AFC) methods mainly treat this as a provenance problem, detecting low-level synthesis artifacts to decide whether an image is AI-generated. However, such methods do not verify what human fact-checkers often check: whether an image's content is consistent with the context implied by its accompanying claim. To address this gap, we introduce MIC (Multimodal Inconsistency Checking), an AFC framework that assists human fact-checkers by detecting AI-generated multimodal misinformation and explaining inconsistencies using world knowledge. MIC first uses supervised fine-tuning (SFT) for task adaptation and then applies Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to directly optimize component-level verifiable rewards for verdict prediction, inconsistency type classification, visual evidence description, and world-knowledge explanation. We further introduce MIC-Bench, a benchmark comprising 8,812 image-claim instances derived from 4,406 claims, where each claim is paired with an authentic image and an AI-generated counterpart that introduces a controlled contextual inconsistency. Compared with SFT alone, GRPO further improves Macro-F1 by 4.67 and 4.11 points in the in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings, respectively, while also improving the semantic similarity of visual evidence descriptions and world-knowledge explanations to reference annotations. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/UKPLab/arxiv2026-mic.