Papers for
news monitoring teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Global narrative events show recurring burst patterns across topics
Peak-DNA: Recurrent Morphology in Global Narrative Propagation
Abstract: Global narrative streams exhibit noisy, fragmented, and asynchronous amplification bursts, making direct waveform comparison unreliable for recurrence analysis. This paper introduces Peak-DNA, a framework for identifying recurrent propagation morphology in global narrative streams. The proposed framework transforms hourly GDELT activity into normalized macro-peak episodes through denoising, macro-peak consolidation, and temporal alignment, and compares propagation morphology using DTW-based similarity analysis. Using GDELT narrative streams, we analyze five high-amplification narrative domains: Iran, Defense, AI, Space/Elon, and Quantum/PQC. The results show that amplification events repeatedly converge toward morphology-level propagation patterns within each narrative domain. DTW-based similarity analysis further demonstrates strong intra-domain structural compactness despite heterogeneous publication dynamics and severe observational noise. These findings suggest a measurable morphology layer beyond semantic content or anomaly intensity, providing an initial structural foundation for recurrence-aware narrative monitoring, propagation family discovery, and longitudinal Narrative Genome analysis.
State media articles from 136 countries reveal shifting global narratives
The World as Viewed by 136 Countries: An Open, Curated, Annotated, and Multilingual Dataset of 118 Million State Media Articles
Abstract: State media outlets often project their governments' narratives to target both domestic and foreign audiences. Because this content is plentiful and free to access, it appears widely in the web corpora that large language models (LLMs) are trained on and that retrieval systems draw from. However, the prevalence of state media in these corpora and its potential influence on LLM outputs remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce WorldStateMedia, an open dataset of 118 million state media articles from 136 countries in 114 languages. We extract these articles from existing pretraining corpora and annotate each outlet with level of state control from State Media Monitor. Using WorldStateMedia to audit these corpora, we find that, in English web crawls, the share of state media pages from editorially controlled (vs. independent) outlets rose from 39% in 2013 to 93% in 2025. In several low-resource languages, state media make up a substantial share of all web data, such as 17.8% for Uyghur and 7.8% for Belarusian. To characterize the differing narratives of news outlets, we compare Russian and Ukrainian state media in English and in their native languages, revealing asymmetric topical focus and opposing framings of contested issues such as Crimea. Furthermore, in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) experiment on territorial disputes, retrieving a country's state media shifts model answers toward that country's claims, most strongly for English-language (foreign-targeted) media. We release WorldStateMedia to support multilingual, cross-national insights on state media at https://huggingface.co/collections/manestay/worldstatemedia
Causality extraction system detects false cause claims in news accurately
Shrome at Touché: Soft-Vote Ensembling and Counter-Causal Augmentation for Causality Extraction
Abstract: Touché 2026 extends causality extraction to counter-causal claims: news sentences whose surface form appears causal but whose meaning denies the causation, as in "It is falsely believed that X caused Y." A system that relies on surface cues such as "caused" or "led to" will accept such a sentence as causal and give it the wrong polarity. On the Countercausal News Corpus (CCNC), the task has three subtasks: deciding whether a sentence is causal (detection), locating its cause and effect spans (extraction), and labeling its polarity as procausal, counter-causal, or uncausal. We build one model per subtask. Detection is a fine-tuned classifier with a single cross-task rule that uses the extracted spans to remove false positives. For extraction, we ensemble three RoBERTa-large BILOU+CRF taggers by averaging their token-level scores before decoding, rather than voting on the spans each tagger produces. For polarity, where labeled counter-causal examples are scarcest, we add training sentences generated by a large language model prompted with nine patterns of counter-causal expression adapted from Hagen et al., keeping only those that pass automatic structural checks. On the held-out CCNC test set, the system reaches F1 0.869 on detection and macro-F1 0.817 on polarity, and in the organizers' final causal-only evaluation of extraction it scores granularity-adjusted F1 0.728, the highest extraction score among all submissions including the organizers' baseline. The development split is used only for component selection and the ablations reported in the paper.