Papers for

neural network engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Neural network size must grow to find complex patterns early in learning

Representation Complexity Along Learning Trajectories: Trading Width for Precision and Time

Abstract: What computational role does overparameterisation play during learning? Information-plane analyses suggest that neural networks can traverse representations substantially more complex than those required by their final predictors. We explore when this transient complexity serves a computational purpose by comparing the representation complexity needed for prediction with that needed to make an unknown target statistically visible through gradient feedback. We introduce an oracle model of neural network learning and use Kolmogorov \(n\)-widths to quantify effective representation complexity. Our main technical result transfers complexity bounds from the forward representation to the corresponding gradient-query features. Combined with statistical-query lower bounds, this gives a task-agnostic lower bound on the initial effective width required for target-dependent gradient information to become detectable. For \(k\)-sparse parity in \(D\) dimensions, a known target admits an \(O(k)\)-width representation, while the general bound already implies a polynomial separation between representation and discovery. We then exploit parity's invariance under coordinatewise sign reflections to identify a sharper unsigned effective width, which removes sign distinctions invisible to the parity information channel. At a transfer-compatible measurement resolution, its critical scale is \(\widetildeΘ_k\left( D^{k-1}τ^2 \right)\), up to logarithmic factors. Thus, the representation resources required to discover a predictor can substantially exceed those required to represent it once learned. Interpreting precision through accumulation over fresh samples yields a corresponding width-time frontier. Experiments support the predicted dimension dependence and examine how optimisation and generalisation depart from this idealised frontier.

Wed 28 OctMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
This paper studies why big neural networks use more complicated internal steps when learning than needed for their final task. The authors show that finding complex patterns can require much larger network capacity than just representing them after learning. Using mathematical tools, they prove limits on how small these networks can be at the start before they can detect a signal through learning. Their experiments confirm these predictions and show how the tradeoff between network size, precision, and time affects learning.
Open → 2610.39027v1

C elegans brain signals follow strongest routes not all paths

Every route counts, but some count more: a max-plus view of the C. elegans brain

Abstract: Brains do not simply add up every signal they receive: they select which routes dominate. Yet connectomes are usually analyzed with tools that sum over all paths and place neural states in Euclidean spaces, blurring the feedback circuits that may sustain internal states. Here we treat neural signaling as routing instead of diffusion and describe it with max-plus algebra, in which signals accumulate along a path and the strongest route prevails. We propose a model in which the functional connectome of Caenorhabditis elegans emerges from the time-varying combination of electrical, synaptic, monoaminergic, neuropeptidergic and hormonal layers, and analyze five networks within this framework. Each collapses onto a handful of dominant feedback loops, which recover well-characterized circuits and point to new candidates for experimental study. Unlike linear spectra, these structures keep the biological meaning of the data, and their order-based description suggests that brain states live in lattices rather than Euclidean spaces.

Tue 27 OctNeural and Evolutionary Computing
The gist
Brains send signals along many paths, but not all paths matter equally. The authors studied the worm C. elegans and showed that its brain activity is best described by focusing on the strongest routes signals take, instead of adding all routes together. They used a math method called max-plus algebra to analyze different types of brain connections and found key feedback loops that could explain how the brain keeps certain states active. This approach suggests that brain activity follows a pattern more like a lattice than like points in ordinary space.
Open → 2610.37587v1

Symmetry limits model capacity and breaks rotation invariance

Symmetry Breaking Is the Price of Finite Capacity

Abstract: If rotating a problem never changes its answer, one might expect its best model to be rotation-invariant; we show that this fails, predictably and by an exact amount, when capacity is limited. A symmetry groups a model's directions into blocks of equally strong directions, a symmetric model must use each block whole, and when the budget cuts a block every optimal model breaks the symmetry. For a Gaussian problem with a $k$-unit bilinear predictor, the log-loss price of symmetry is exactly $(U_k-I_k)/(2σ^2)$, the signal of the best $k$ directions minus that of the best whole blocks. Because an attention head compares tokens through a similarity of rank at most its head dimension, whatever computation precedes it, the same price governs heads fitted to a symmetric similarity by squared error, and heads trained this way on three-dimensional directions break symmetry at exactly the predicted head dimensions, with the predicted rotation sensitivity (RMSE 0.004). Under softmax attention, flatter attention restores the predicted symmetric head where tested, while with peaked attention broken heads beat every whole-shell symmetric head at 16 of 20 head dimensions. We give a procedure that separates capacity-driven breaking from other causes.

Mon 26 OctMachine Learning
The gist
When a problem looks the same if you rotate it, you might expect the best model to treat all directions equally. This paper shows that when a model has limited size or capacity, it cannot maintain this perfect equality and must break the symmetry in a predictable way. The authors calculate exactly how much worse a symmetric model does compared to one that breaks symmetry, especially for models like attention heads in AI. They also provide methods to separate this effect from other reasons a model might break symmetry.
Open → 2610.36138v1

ReLU networks can be simplified to just two hidden layers

Two $\operatorname{ReLU}$ Layers is All You Need

Abstract: We prove that every $\operatorname{ReLU}$ network can be exactly simulated by a $\operatorname{ReLU}$ network with two hidden layers. We present two proofs: one that is based on fillings in homological algebra and a direct combinatorial proof.

Tue 20 OctComputational ComplexityComputational GeometryMachine Learning
The gist
Neural networks that use the ReLU function usually have many layers to do their job. This paper shows that any ReLU network can be copied exactly using just two hidden layers. The authors give two different proofs, one using ideas from an area called homological algebra and another using direct counting methods. This means complex neural networks might be easier to understand or build.
Open → 2610.28587v1

Upper limits on complexity in spiking neural network computations

Upper bounds on the number of causal pieces in spiking neural networks

Abstract: The input space of single-spike neural networks decomposes into causal pieces, and the number of causal pieces has been shown to provide a lower bound on the approximation error for some spiking neural networks. While this decomposition is applicable to a wide range of spiking neuron models, the limits of how many causal pieces can be realised by spiking neural networks are still unknown. In this work, we derive two complementary upper bounds on the number of causal pieces in feedforward single-spike neural networks. First, we establish a combinatorial bound given by the poly-Bernoulli numbers, which applies to a broad class of spiking neuron models. The bound is of order $e^{2(L-1)N\log N+\mathcal{O}(N)}$, with network depth $L$ and maximum layer width $N$. Second, for a specific set of neuron models, we derive a bound based on hyperplane arrangements. Applying the latter framework, we obtain bounds of order $\mathcal{O}\!\left(N^{(4L-3)(N_0-1)}\right)$ for the non-leaky integrate-and-fire model with exponential synapses and the ReLU-type spike response model, and $\mathcal{O}\!\left(N^{L(N_0-1)}\right)$ for the leaky integrate-and-fire model with Dirac-$δ$ synapses, where $N_0$ is the input dimension. For the non-leaky integrate-and-fire model with Dirac-$δ$ synapses, additional temporal structure allows us to sharpen the general combinatorial bound to one that depends only on $N_0$, independently of the network depth and widths.

Thu 15 OctNeural and Evolutionary ComputingArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Spiking neural networks process information by dividing possible inputs into different regions called causal pieces. This paper finds upper limits on how many such pieces these networks can create, which helps understand their complexity and error bounds when approximating functions. The researchers provide two types of mathematical bounds: one general bound applying to many neuron types, and a second more specific one for certain neuron models, using geometric and combinatorial techniques. These bounds clarify how network depth, width, and input size affect the number of causal pieces.
Open → 2610.22484v1

Muon polar update optimal only under specific radial conditions

When Is Muon Optimal? Radial Fragility and Minimax Geometry

Abstract: Muon replaces a matrix gradient by an approximate polar factor and has shown strong empirical performance in neural-network training. The Isotropic Curvature Model (ICM) provides a curvature-based explanation for this update by asking when gradient orthogonalization minimizes a one-step local-loss surrogate. We investigate the stability of this explanation when the fixed input radius of the ICM is replaced by a general radial law. We introduce the Random-Radius Isotropic Curvature Model (RR-ICM) and the Polar-Factor Admissibility Set, which encodes exact scaled-polar optimality as a geometric condition on the positive polar factor of the gradient. We derive an exact characterization of this set for arbitrary radial laws and show that all nonscalar admissible responses arise from radial atoms aligned with curvature kinks. Consequently, every atomless radial law exhibits zero-capacity rigidity: exact scaled-polar optimality is possible only when the gradient is already a scaled column isometry. To connect the curvature-based framework with the established spectral geometry of Muon, we introduce the Minimax RR-ICM by replacing directional averaging with worst-case optimization over probability laws on the sphere. We prove that every nonzero global minimizer lies on the polar ray of the gradient, while its scale is determined by a one-dimensional convex problem. The corresponding admissibility geometry is a positive-semidefinite trace slab, in sharp contrast to the spherical-zonoid geometry of the RR-ICM. Together, these results expose the radial fragility of average-curvature explanations and provide a new minimax variational characterization of Muon's polar direction.

Thu 15 OctArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Training neural networks involves adjusting models to improve accuracy. The authors study Muon, a method that changes these adjustments to use an approximation called the polar factor. They find that Muon's effectiveness depends heavily on assumptions about how input data distances are distributed. When these assumptions change, the method only works optimally under very strict conditions. Their work introduces new ways to understand when Muon’s approach is best and reveals limitations of previous explanations.
Open → 2610.21549v1

Exact algorithm speeds up hardware software task splitting dramatically

Parametrized Exact Hardware-Software Partitioning

Abstract: When optimizing computing architecture for specific computationally intensive tasks, such as evaluating or training a neural network, it is important to identify what computational subtasks will offer the greatest decrease in cost (e.g., wall clock time or energy usage). This problem is known as Hardware-Software (HS) Partitioning, and it has a variety of formulations, many of which are NP-Hard. In this paper, we will define a family of HS Partitioning formulations which admit an exact fixed parameter tractable algorithm based on the directed pathwidth of the given task graph and show that this family of problems contains multiple existing formulations such as makespan minimization. Finally, we examine task graphs with small directed pathwidth that arise in real world applications and show that our algorithm can provide a speed up of up to 200x over a comparable linear programming approach utilizing the Gurobi ILP Library.

Tue 6 OctData Structures and Algorithms
The gist
Splitting tasks between hardware and software can be very hard, especially when trying to do it in the best possible way. The authors define a new way to look at this problem that allows them to solve it exactly and much faster for certain types of task graphs with special shapes. Their method can speed up calculations by up to 200 times compared to older techniques, making it easier to optimize systems that run things like neural networks. This work applies particularly well when the tasks have a certain ‘directed pathwidth’ property that controls their complexity.
Open → 2610.08645v1

Sensory motor boundary changes affect brain network evolution results

Null-model treatment of the sensory-motor boundary changes an evolutionary connectome comparison

Abstract: Randomised copies of a connectome are the usual baseline for asking whether measured wiring matters, and the answer depends on what the randomisation preserves. We evolved embodied foraging agents whose brains are a compressed adult Drosophila connectome (FlyWire v783; 512 cell-type groups and 1,000 Kenyon cells) alongside agents built on randomised wiring, in pre-registered experiments with ten seeds, four ecologies and 600 generations. Two standard randomisations, a column shuffle and degree-preserving edge swaps, route 10.6 to 10.7 % of olfactory output directly onto descending motor groups, against 0.012 % in the connectome. On the registered primary endpoint, fitness averaged over the run, no difference was detected; at the last common-garden probe the connectome was behind both controls (-0.22 and -0.20 fitness units on seed means). Against controls that keep every sensory-output and motor-input edge and rewire only the interior, the seed-mean difference lay within a +/-0.10 equivalence bound (+0.002 and -0.074, unchanged under a calibration that also matches activity spread), although per ecology the interior column shuffle was ahead by 0.26 in one of four ecologies at ten seeds, a lead that ten further pre-registered seeds did not replicate. Rewiring the connectome so that it acquires the shortcut raised its fitness by 0.44 (10 of 10 seeds) and its dependence on olfaction from 0.15 to 0.99; graded doses raised both in step; at comparable swap counts the full dose was ahead of an interior-only sham by 0.53 (10 of 10 seeds); and a sham that rewired the same boundary edges without creating shortcuts matched the connectome (+0.007) while the full dose was ahead of it by 0.60. What a null preserves at the sensory-motor boundary can decide an evolutionary connectome comparison, and sensory-to-motor path statistics belong next to the degree statistics a null is said to preserve.

Wed 30 SeptNeural and Evolutionary Computing
The gist
Scientists studied how tiny changes in brain wiring affect the evolution of foraging behavior in simulated flies. They found that if random changes in the brain preserve certain connections between sensory inputs and motor outputs, it can greatly influence the outcomes of evolutionary tests. The study shows that how you shuffle or randomize brain wiring in experiments matters a lot, especially at the boundary where sensing meets action. This insight can help improve how researchers compare brain networks fairly.
Open → 2609.39248v1

Causal interventions can give right answers through wrong model pathways

Right Answer, Wrong Mechanism: Detecting Pernicious Divergence in Causal Interventions

Abstract: Causal interventions such as activation patching and distributed alignment search (DAS) are the main tool for making mechanistic claims about neural networks. Recent work showed that these interventions routinely push representations off the model's natural distribution, and that such divergence is sometimes harmless and sometimes pernicious: it can recruit pathways the model never uses on natural inputs, so that an intervention produces the expected answer through the wrong mechanism. No method currently tells the two cases apart. We make this question testable by planting hidden pathways inside pretrained language models; the pathways are silent on every benchmark prompt by construction, so which interventions depend on them is known exactly. Across 72 configurations and 100,800 interventions on GPT-2 small, we find three things. (i) Nearest-neighbour and local-PCA distances at the intervention site, as used in prior work, score below chance (AUROC 0.35-0.47) at picking out interventions that give the right answer through a planted pathway. (ii) Hidden-Pathway Contribution (HPC), a label-free test that clamps downstream units to the regime of natural runs with the same output and measures how much of the decision disappears, flags pathway-dominated interventions with AUROC >= 0.99 when the pathway shows up as unit-level out-of-regime activity, but fails when every unit stays within its natural range, which we identify as the open problem. (iii) Optimised interventions actively seek hidden pathways: on a gender task, DAS routes 90-95% of its successes through planted pathways for three of four families, and a downstream on-manifold penalty cuts this share to under 5% at a cost of 6-11 points of success rate. In unmodified GPT-2, successful interventions show almost no unit-level out-of-regime reliance.

Wed 30 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Sometimes when researchers try to understand how AI language models work by intervening on parts of them, the model gives the right answer but by using unexpected hidden routes inside itself. The authors created secret pathways inside a popular AI model and tested hundreds of thousands of interventions to see which ones relied on these hidden paths. They found that existing ways to detect if an intervention uses these hidden routes often fail, but a new method called Hidden-Pathway Contribution can detect many cases when the hidden routes produce the answer. However, when the hidden routes behave like normal parts of the model, detecting them remains a big challenge.
Open → 2609.39243v1

Feed-forward layers guide transformer tokens toward agreement dynamically

The Role of Feed-Forward Layers in Transformer Dynamics

Abstract: We study the dynamical behavior of tokens in transformers from a control-theoretic perspective. Our model includes the feed-forward layer present after the self-attention mechanism, with the self-attention mechanism interpreted as an interacting particle system and the feed-forward layer as an independent control. Our main theoretical result establishes that the feed-forward network can steer the tokens arbitrarily close to consensus regardless of the key, query, and value matrices. Our result are easily extended to convergence to many clusters and to multi-head attention. We conduct numerical experiments to verify our results, and compare thresholding behavior from our theory to real-world LLMs.

Mon 28 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Transformers are computer programs that process language by passing information between tokens. This paper looks at how one part of these transformers—the feed-forward layer—helps guide tokens toward agreeing with one another regardless of how the attention part works. The researchers showed mathematically that the feed-forward layers can steer tokens to align closely, even pushing tokens into groups. They then tested their math with computer simulations and compared it to behavior seen in big language models.
Open → 2609.36230v1

Transformer gates tune activation using shared reference direction

Transformer MLP Gate Thresholds Are Couplings to a Carried Reference Direction

Abstract: The corpus-mean direction of a transformer's residual stream is a component shared across all inputs, and is commonly removed by mean-centering before representational analysis. We present evidence that it is a functional component: the reference against which the MLP gate population sets its operating point. In Phi-2, an exact decomposition of resting gate pre-activations shows that at mid-stack layers the resting inhibition of >99.9% of gates is carried by the coupling $w \cdot b_L$ to the carried mean direction, at 48-56$\times$ the explicit bias parameter, and the coupling is direction-specific: a random direction at matched norm orders the population's firing rates at Spearman $ρ\leq 0.09$ where the reference reaches 0.95. (That 0.95 is near-tautological on its own; the paper derives its null.) Causally, removing the stream's projection on the reference multiplies above-threshold firing by about 9$\times$, dose-monotonically, at 23-59$\times$ a norm-matched control; a random-initialised twin is flat, and replacement tests show that the direction carries the function and the magnitude does not. A direction-matched control makes the same point: noise injected along the reference costs 8-42$\times$ the same energy along a random direction. The decomposition replicates on four further families spanning both gate types (GELU with an explicit gate bias, bias-free SwiGLU), and the dose-response on two of them. Across an eight-model scan the mechanism is present in every GELU and SiLU family and absent only in OPT, where an opposing LayerNorm bias cancels the carried reference. Gate thresholds are implemented as couplings to a constant the network builds for the distribution it is reading, with the bias parameters contributing little; how much of that constant is carried in the stream and how much in parameters depends on the architecture.

Fri 25 SeptComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Large language models use parts called gates inside their layers that control how much information passes through. The authors found that these gates rely on a shared 'reference direction' hidden in the model's internal signals to set their activation thresholds. Instead of individual gate biases, this shared reference strongly influences when gates turn on or off. This discovery shows how the model internally organizes its control points consistently across many gates and layers.
Open → 2609.31956v1

Spiking neural network model simulates basic brain self-awareness rhythms

A Spiking Neural Network Model of Elementary Self-Consciousness via Endogenous Default Mode Network Dynamics

Abstract: Understanding the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self-referential cognition and baseline self-consciousness remains a fundamental challenge in computational neuroscience. In this work, we propose a large-scale computational model incorporating a 10,000-neuron spiking neural network (SNN) based on Izhikevich dynamics. The network is structured into two interacting subsystems: a sensory processing layer (5,000 regular-spiking cortical neurons) and an endogenous Default Mode Network (DMN) pacemaker subsystem (5,000 intrinsically bursting neurons). The DMN layer is modulated by continuous tonic currents reflecting ascending brainstem neuromodulation, maintaining intrinsic, autonomous bioelectric rhythms independent of external sensory input. To represent top-down cognitive modulation, synaptic weights are hierarchically structured such that DMN-to-network projections exceed sensory-level connections. Through numerical simulations using a modified two-step Euler integration scheme, we demonstrate how endogenous pacemaker activity interacts with transient external sensory perturbations, providing an elementary mathematical framework for the emergence of a persistent, self-sustaining neural representation of "Self".

Thu 24 SeptNeural and Evolutionary Computing
The gist
Understanding how the brain creates a sense of self-awareness is a tough problem. The authors built a detailed computer model simulating key brain areas with 10,000 nerve-like units called neurons. Their model shows how internal brain rhythms can keep a kind of ongoing 'self' signal alive even without outside input. This helps explain how baseline self-consciousness might emerge from brain activity.
Open → 2609.29984v1

Emotions influence decision chaos in interacting biological networks

Emotions as intrinsic colored noise in biological systems

Abstract: The idea that emotions in biological systems are analogous to intrinsic colored noise is advanced and justified. A model describing the dynamics of operation of biological networks under the influence of colored noise is suggested. The agents of a biological network can be represented either by biological species, such as humans and animals, or by neurons of the brain, or by the nodes of a neural network. Operational actions, or decisions, in a biological noisy network are based not only on the evaluation of utility of alternatives, but also on the agents emotions. The model is probabilistic, with the choice of alternatives characterized by the related probabilities. At the initial step, the agents make decisions individually and then start exchanging information with each other and imitating the actions of other agents, thus forming a biological network of interacting agents. Numerical simulations are accomplished for a heterogeneous society consisting of three groups of agents, one group possessing long-range memory, the other group, short-range memory, and the third group of super-rational agents acting strictly on the basis of utility, being deprived of emotions. Dynamics of opinions in different groups can be smooth, oscillatory, or chaotic. Altogether, eight types of operation are found, depending on the dynamics of group decisions. Under strong imitation effect, there appears chaotic motion in the evolution of decision choice. It is shown how the Ellsberg paradox can be resolved and how the exchange of information influences the dynamics of this paradox.

Tue 22 SeptSocial and Information Networks
The gist
The paper explores how emotions can be thought of as a kind of intrinsic 'colored noise' influencing decisions in living systems, like humans or neurons. It presents a probabilistic model where individuals choose actions based on both utility and emotions and then share information and imitate others, forming a network. This interaction can lead to smooth, oscillating, or chaotic opinion patterns in groups with different memory types or rationality levels. The model also helps explain a famous puzzle about decision-making under uncertainty, known as the Ellsberg paradox.
Open → 2609.25970v1

Bias changes memory capacity scaling in dense associative networks

Bias-Induced Crossover in Absolute Capacity of Dense Associative Memory

Abstract: The absolute capacity of dense associative memory has mainly been analyzed for unbiased patterns. Here we examine the effect of bias in centered binary patterns under the Krotov-Hopfield single-site criterion $P_{\mathrm{error}}=1/N$, where $P_{\mathrm{error}}$ is the probability that a single-site flip lowers the energy of a stored pattern and $N$ is the number of neurons. Each pattern component takes $1-q$ with probability $q$ and $-q$ otherwise, where $0<q\le1/2$. For polynomial interactions of order $n$, a signal-to-noise analysis gives an absolute capacity of order $N^{n-1}/\ln N$ at $q=1/2$. For fixed $q<1/2$, however, the capacity is $O(N^{n/2})$ for even $n\ge4$ and $O(N^{(n+1)/2})$ for odd $n\ge5$. For $n=3$, both the unbiased and fixed-bias capacities remain $O(N^2/\ln N)$. For $n\ge4$, these different asymptotic forms imply a nonuniform large-$N$ limit near $q=1/2$. Asymptotic matching predicts a bias-induced crossover in the region $1-2q=O(\ln N/N^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor-1})$. The crossover originates from a bias-dependent crosstalk mean that reduces the stability of sites carrying the more frequent value $-q$. Computer simulations are compared with the finite-size conditioned-Gaussian predictions. An activity-dependent control potential that cancels the conditional crosstalk mean restores the $N^{n-1}/\ln N$ capacity for fixed $0<q<1/2$ within the conditioned-Gaussian approximation.

Tue 15 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Memory systems in the brain and computers can store patterns, and their ability to hold many patterns is called capacity. This paper studies how having biased data, where some bits are more common than others, affects this capacity in a particular type of memory model. The authors found that bias changes how capacity grows as the system size increases, causing a crossover between two growth types depending on the bias level. They also show how to adjust the model to keep high capacity even with biased patterns.
Open → 2609.17477v1