Papers for

natural language processing platform teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Fine-tuning large language models affects machine translation instruction following

Fine-Tuning LLMs for Translation: General Forgetting Mitigation Does Not Preserve MT-Specific Instruction Following

Abstract: Fine-tuning large language models on parallel data improves translation quality but can cause catastrophic forgetting. Mitigation methods are generally evaluated by retention on general benchmarks. We ask whether these findings transfer to machine translation (MT) fine-tuning and to MT-specific instruction following (MT-IF): instructions that modify a translation, such as formality, grammatical gender, and length control. We compare methods anchored to auxiliary data, to model outputs, and to the base model parameters, first in a screening study with Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, then on Llama 3.1 8B Instruct fine-tuned on bidirectional Arabic-English or Spanish-English data. Elastic Weight Consolidation preserves general capabilities best in both stages; on the 8B Spanish model the average score on general benchmarks drops 1.7 points versus 11.0 for standard fine-tuning, yet its scores for formality and grammatical gender control remain close to standard fine-tuning. Only data mixing with control-task examples preserves these controls, but its gains do not transfer to unseen prompts for the same task.

Wed 23 SeptComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with translation data can improve how well they translate but may cause them to forget other abilities. The authors studied if methods that prevent forgetting in general also keep the models good at following translation-specific instructions, like controlling formality or length. They found that common methods help preserve general skills but do not keep translation instructions working well. Only mixing in special control examples during training helped keep some of these translation instructions, but it didn’t work well on new, unseen instructions.
Open → 2609.28395v1

Quality gated layers convert pretrained attention in language models

TinyCeNN-LM: Quality-Gated Conversion of Pretrained Attention with CeNN-Inspired Cellular-Recurrent Layers

Abstract: Replacing attention in a pretrained language model is a compatibility problem: a plausible substitute may alter representations expected by later layers. TinyCeNN-LM introduces a \emph{quality-gated post-training conversion} framework using CeNN-inspired cellular-recurrent layers with bounded local processing, compact recurrent memory, routing, fusion, and accept-or-rollback validation. Three implementations are studied: Integrated Memory, MemoryFusion, and PDelta3-GDN2-CLVR+Local32. Strict PDelta3 conversion accepts a layer only when representation and NLL criteria pass fixed thresholds. On SmolLM2-135M, layers 0-2 are accepted with cumulative $Δ\mathrm{NLL}=+0.01209$, while layer 3 is rejected despite acceptable NLL because representation fidelity fails. On Qwen3.5-0.8B, full-attention layers 3, 7, and 11 are accepted with final $Δ\mathrm{NLL}=+0.02073$. Integrated Memory keeps perplexity within $-0.07\%$ to $+0.93\%$ while reducing total cache by up to $6.01\%$. A sampled 200-item downstream sanity check gives $28.5\%$--$32.0\%$ overall accuracy for converted Qwen releases. The results support conservative, quality-gated structural conversion rather than universal attention replacement or speedup.

Thu 17 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Language models use a technique called attention to understand text, but swapping this out after training can harm how well the model works later. The authors present TinyCeNN-LM, a careful step-by-step method that replaces attention with special recurrent layers inspired by cellular networks without losing too much accuracy. They test their method on different large language models showing it keeps performance stable by only accepting new layers when they meet strict quality checks. This helps keep models efficient while maintaining the expected behavior.
Open → 2609.21139v1

Machine translation meta-evaluation balances adequacy and fluency tradeoffs

Mind Which Bird You Favour: Parameterizing Adequacy-Fluency Balance in Meta-Evaluation of Machine Translation

Abstract: There is a tradeoff in machine translation meta-evaluation between prioritizing alignment with adequacy versus fluency. The balance depends on the combination of translation systems in the meta-evaluation dataset. This system set is a small, filtered sample whose characteristics change heavily across years and language pairs; it does not represent the true system distribution. Consequently, the adequacy-fluency balance is often unrepresentative and subject to change. For sensitive domains, controlling this balance is critical. We expose this balance as a tunable choice. To achieve a target balance, we reweight existing systems while minimizing distortion from uniform weighting, ensuring the evaluated systems remain real and representative. We provide an exact optimization algorithm with theoretical guarantees and pruning mechanisms to compute these weights. To validate meta-evaluation internal consistency, we design a scorer-augmentation framework that establishes a known relative identity for the scorers. Results demonstrate that our reweighting method effectively controls the adequacy-fluency balance and preserves the internal consistency, outperforming prior approaches. Finally, we analyze the performance of popular scorers across a sweep of this parameter.

Sun 13 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Evaluating machine translation quality is tricky because it involves balancing how accurate the translation is (adequacy) and how natural it sounds (fluency). The authors found that this balance changes depending on the set of translation systems tested, which isn't stable over time or languages. They developed a method to adjust the importance of adequacy versus fluency in evaluation without distorting the set of real translation systems. Their approach also keeps evaluations internally consistent and works better than previous methods. This helps make translation quality checks more reliable, especially in critical areas.
Open → 2609.14795v1

Expert pruning improves model compression for machine translation

ESTS at WMT26: Routing-Informed Expert Pruning for Model Compression

Abstract: We describe six submissions under the team name ESTS to the unconstrained WMT26 Model Compression Shared Task for English--Simplified Chinese and English--Egyptian Arabic. We submit three compression operating points per translation direction, all derived from GPT-OSS-20B. We use task-specific routing mass to rank experts and cross-lingual routing divergence to allocate retained capacity across layers, then physically remove low-importance experts. The resulting specialists are recovery-tuned on GPT-5.1-generated synthetic translation data and further compressed by applying MXFP4 quantization to the retained expert projection weights. We additionally implement a robust inference system for the instruction-conditioned WMT26 setting, including category inference, output validation, retries, segmented fallback, and source-owned JSON reconstruction. Across our six submissions, parameter counts range from 4.186B to 7.770B and packed artifact sizes from 4.55 to 6.33~GiB. Internal xCOMET-XL evaluation using GPT-5.1 pseudo-references provides an internal comparison across the submitted compression operating points.

Fri 11 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Machine translation models can be very large and slow. The team named ESTS developed a way to shrink large translation models by identifying and removing less important pieces called experts. They then fine-tune the smaller models on synthetic translation examples to keep quality high and use special compression techniques to make the models smaller. Their method allows for different sizes of compressed models and improved robustness when translating between English, Simplified Chinese, and Egyptian Arabic. They also created a system to help manage various challenges during translation inference.
Open → 2609.12310v1