Papers for

multimodal system developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Pace-mem improves multimodal agents question answering with smarter memory retrieval

PACE-Mem: Prefix-Aware Complementary Evidence for Multimodal Agents

Abstract: As multimodal agents accumulate experience, their long-term memories contain many similar observations of recurring scenes, actions, and entities. Answer quality depends on the evidence retrieved from these memories into the model's context. However, query-relevant memories may contain overlapping information, and a fixed retrieval depth may return too little or too much evidence for a given question. To address these challenges, we propose PACE-Mem, Prefix-Aware Complementary Evidence, which constructs a complementary evidence sequence and determines its length from the same selection trajectory. For structured memories, query-guided pooling combines records within each clip to obtain relevance scores and representations. Using these relevance scores and representations, maximal marginal relevance (MMR) selection balances query relevance against overlap with previously selected evidence. From the resulting score trajectory, a prefix-length selection algorithm determines retrieval depth by comparing length-normalized adjacent declines, accounting for both score changes and the amount of evidence accumulated. PACE-Mem is a training-free, plug-in retrieval method for clip-based agent memory systems, leaving memory construction and answer generation unchanged. Across three long-video benchmarks and two agent frameworks, PACE-Mem improves question-answering accuracy by an average of 1.6% over Adaptive-k, the strongest baseline at comparable mean retrieval depths. Further analysis reveals that jointly adding and removing evidence is associated with larger net accuracy gains than either change alone.

Sat 17 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Multimodal agents remember many similar events, which can make it hard to find the best information to answer questions accurately. The authors propose PACE-Mem, a method that picks the right amount of helpful memories without repeating too much overlapping information. It does this by scoring and selecting evidence in a way that balances relevance and uniqueness, deciding exactly how much to include for each question. This approach works without changing how memories are stored or how answers are generated, and it improves accuracy on long video tasks.
Open → 2610.24378v1

Multimodal sentiment models handle missing text audio or video segments better

Reliability-Aware Multimodal Sentiment Prediction Under Local Modality Missingness

Abstract: Multimodal sentiment models are usually evaluated on complete utterances, yet streams often lose a contiguous span of text, audio, or video. We study local missingness on aligned CMU-MOSEI features. Our reliability-aware network (RM-Net) keeps the original temporal positions, represents unobserved positions with a learned token, outputs bounded per-modality intensity contributions gated by observation quality, and is trained with dual-view masking of contiguous segments. We fuse five RM-Net seeds with a LoRA-adapted BERT text expert, using a fusion weight that depends only on the visible fraction of content tokens. Architecture, checkpoint, and fusion choices were made on the validation split. On the held-out split, the fused model reaches a macro-F1 of 0.655 on clean inputs and 0.634 under 40\% mixed missingness; its two-view average exceeds the auxiliary-head baseline by 0.024 (95\% video-cluster bootstrap interval [0.003, 0.045]). Because this split was inspected during development, these numbers are not a blind test. For explanations, exact Shapley attributions over the eight modality subsets and position-level occlusion show that top-ranked positions reduce the predicted-class probability faster than random positions (AUC gap 0.113 on validation). We also describe an auditable word-level alignment pipeline for raw clips; its outputs do not feed the predictive models.

Wed 14 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Sentiment analysis models that use multiple types of data like text, audio, and video usually expect all data to be present. The authors looked at cases where parts of these data types are missing for short times. They created a new network that knows which parts are missing, represents missing pieces with special tokens, and adjusts how much each data type contributes based on quality. Their combined model works well even when up to 40% of the multimodal input is missing. They also developed ways to explain which parts of the data are most important for the predictions.
Open → 2610.20543v1

Vision transformers reduce computation by reconstructing important tokens

Bottlenecked semantic compression by representation reconstruction

Abstract: Vision Transformers incur high computational costs when processing long visual token sequences. Existing reduction methods typically rank tokens independently and discard those deemed unimportant or redundant. We propose a reconstruction-guided framework for visual token condensation (ReConV), which summarizes the complete visual sequence with a compact Summary Bank (SMB) and retains tokens whose information is not adequately captured by the SMB, as indicated by their reconstruction residuals. At each compression layer, a lightweight position-conditioned decoder reconstructs the current tokens, leaving shared information compressed in the SMB while explicitly preserving poorly reconstructed details. Experiments on image classification and multimodal understanding demonstrate favorable performance-efficiency trade-offs: ReConV surpasses the uncompressed baseline with 48\% fewer GMACs on ImageNet and enables reusable image-level representations for efficient multi-turn inference. Code is available at TokenDrop.

Mon 12 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Processing images with vision transformers can be slow because they analyze many small pieces called tokens. The authors propose a new way to shrink the number of tokens by first creating a summary of all tokens and then keeping only those tokens that the summary can’t accurately recreate. This approach helps keep important details while reducing the amount of computation needed. Their method works well on tasks like image recognition and understanding images with text.
Open → 2610.17412v1

Models reveal where safety decisions emerge combining images and words

From Local Evidence to Safety Verdicts: Causal Tracing in Vision-Language Models

Abstract: A vision-language model may need to combine an image with a prompt to recognize a safety risk that neither reveals alone. Where does this joint safety judgment become accessible inside the model? We introduce SSU-Bench, a dataset of matched safe and unsafe image-text combinations constructed using single-item prompt edits or image edits with annotated intended regions. Using three vision-language models, we transfer internal states between paired inputs and measure the resulting change in the safety verdict. Across models and both types of counterfactual, interventions at the changed input positions are effective in earlier decoder layers, while interventions at the final input token become effective later. Directions estimated from other examples produce similar late-layer effects. A linear readout of the final-token state also predicts the model's own verdict, including incorrect judgments, and cross-model comparisons reveal similarities in the patterns of counterfactual change. These findings identify a recurring transition in where interventions can influence a joint safety verdict and distinguish a readable model decision from a correct safety judgment.

Mon 5 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Sometimes a computer needs to look at a picture and text together to decide if something might be unsafe. The authors made a special dataset to test how vision-language models make these safety decisions inside their 'brains.' They found that different parts of the model become important at different times depending on whether the change is in the image or the words. Also, a simple part of the model’s final decision can predict what safety judgment it will make, even if that judgment isn’t correct. This helps us understand how and where these AI models combine info to decide if something is safe or unsafe.
Open → 2610.07514v1

Vision language models miss object direction but new method recovers it

Readout Blindness: VLM Scores Miss the Spatial Direction Their Frozen Encoders Retain

Abstract: CLIP-like vision-language models remain a cornerstone of multimodal systems, yet their scores stay near chance on directed spatial relations, such as whether one object is left of another. We call this failure readout blindness and analyze, theoretically and empirically, why deployed scores miss the direction: when scoring rules treat the subject and object symmetrically, direction cancels regardless of encoder training. Guided by this analysis, we introduce Antisymmetric Displacement Readout (ADR), which aligns caption words with image patches in the frozen features and scores each relation by the signed displacement between matched object centroids. Notably, ADR succeeds without additional training or learned parameters, thereby demonstrating that directional information remains in the frozen encoder. However, text and world priors can inflate accuracy, so we further introduce prior deflation, which measures the benefit of the image-text pairing as the grounded gain over a null that pairs each item with an unrelated image. Extensive experiments across encoder families show that ADR substantially improves over deployed scores, which remain near chance on most direction-balanced sets even for fine-tuned encoders. Compared with more complex readouts, ADR outperforms the evaluated MLLM likelihood readouts and is competitive with their chat inference at a small fraction of the computation. These results support our claim that directional information can be recovered from frozen features by an appropriate readout. Our implementation and evaluation kit will be publicly available.

Mon 5 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMachine Learning
The gist
Vision-language models like CLIP struggle to tell if one object is to the left or right of another, often scoring near random. The authors show this happens because typical scoring methods treat objects symmetrically, hiding directional info even when it's encoded in the model. They propose a new scoring method called Antisymmetric Displacement Readout (ADR) that looks at where objects appear in the image and matches captions to parts of it, revealing direction without extra training. Their tests confirm this approach works well across many models and setups, showing the missing directional info was always there but needed the right way to read it.
Open → 2610.06324v1

Selective forgetting method improves privacy in vision language models

SIEVE: Selective attention-value Suppression for Vision-Language Models Unlearning

Abstract: The ability of vision-language models (VLMs) to associate visual identities with biographical information creates a need for selective unlearning of personally identifiable information (PII) while preserving permitted knowledge about the same individual. This setting is challenging because both sensitive and retained information can share the same visual inputs and intermediate representations. We introduce SIEVE, a simple and effective framework for selective VLM unlearning. SIEVE directly regularizes attention-value representations while also controlling model outputs. SIEVE suppresses attention values for forget examples toward a constant zero, while preserving retain-example representations by matching them to a frozen reference model. These objectives are combined with sequence-level forget and retain supervision, enabling targeted forgetting without largely affecting retained knowledge. Extensive experiments show that SIEVE achieves state-of-the-art performance on unlearning with multiple model-modality settings, while maintaining competitive retained utility. Ablation studies further show that value suppression and negative cross-entropy contribute complementary forgetting signals, while reference-based value matching substantially reduces utility degradation. These results demonstrate that attention values provide an effective intervention point for selective multimodal unlearning when sensitive and retained knowledge are closely related.

Thu 1 OctMachine LearningComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Vision-language models can connect images of people with personal information, which raises privacy concerns. The authors propose a new method called SIEVE that helps these models 'forget' sensitive personal data while keeping other information intact. This is tricky because the same pictures can contain both private and allowed information. SIEVE works by adjusting the model’s attention patterns during learning to suppress forgotten info but keep what should remain. Tests show that SIEVE effectively removes targeted personal info without hurting the model's overall knowledge too much.
Open → 2610.01962v1

Retrieval signals do not improve adaptive routing over query alone

Beyond the Query: Do Retrieval Signals Improve Adaptive Multimodal RAG Routing?

Abstract: Adaptive RAG often uses retrieval-time signals to decide whether another retrieval, reranking, or multimodal step should run. We ask whether these signals add routing value once the query itself is already known. Across document, audio, and video RAG, we compare matched query-only and query+retrieval routers while holding the optional actions, router family, training procedure, and evaluation fixed. On the held-out final evaluation, adding the tested retrieval signals does not produce a reliable routing improvement over the query-only baseline. Some retrieval signals are associated with whether a later step will help, but that predictability does not consistently lead to bet- ter RUN/SKIP decisions. The main lesson is therefore methodological: retrieval-state features should not be credited with routing value unless they improve over a matched query-only control. Our results do not show that routing or retrieval state is generally useless; they show that the incremental value of retrieval signals must be demonstrated rather than assumed.

Fri 11 SeptMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
When deciding which search or analysis steps to take on documents, audio, or video, it might help to use clues from the search results themselves. The authors tested if these extra clues improve decisions compared to just using the original question. They found that adding these retrieval clues did not consistently lead to better choices. So, you shouldn’t assume these clues help unless you check carefully by comparing to using only the original question.
Open → 2609.12437v1