Papers for

multimedia search developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Benchmark reveals challenges in reasoning for audio visual video search

RVG-Bench: A Benchmark for Reasoning-Driven Audio-Visual Temporal Grounding

Abstract: Existing temporal video grounding (TVG) benchmarks primarily focus on localizing target video segments according to descriptive text queries of the visual content. However, real-world queries are more diverse and often require the model to first understand the user's intent before localization, such as finding visual evidence, identifying the cause of an event, or recalling a remembered moment, yet such queries remain largely overlooked. To mitigate this gap, we introduce RVG-Bench, a benchmark for reasoning-driven audio-visual temporal grounding, where every query is constructed such that the target segment can only be identified through reasoning about the query's underlying intent. We carefully construct the benchmark and rigorously verify its data quality to ensure models truly comprehend the audio-visual content. RVG-Bench comprises 1,255 videos and 1,890 query-interval pairs across eight reasoning types. We evaluate 22 models and find that the strongest, Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash, achieves only 49.6 mIoU. Through a series of controlled analyses, including oracle-grounding probes and test-time scaling experiments, we systematically examine where and why current models struggle, providing insights for future model development.

Fri 23 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Many current video search tools find parts of videos by matching simple descriptions. But real questions often require deeper thinking, like understanding why something happened or recalling details from earlier. The authors created RVG-Bench, a new set of videos and questions designed to test if computers can handle these tricky reasoning tasks using both sound and pictures. They tested many current models and found they still struggle, showing there's room for improvement.
Open → 2610.32268v1

Flow-CLIP improves image and text matching with refined visual clues

Flow-CLIP: Image-Conditioned Residual Scoring for CompositionalImage-Text Matching

Abstract: Vision--language pre-training has enabled substantial progress in image--text retrieval and zero-shot recognition by learning transferable cross-modal representations. However, sentence-level alignment remains insufficient for compositional matching, where captions can describe the same objects and attributes while differing in how these elements are bound. To address this limitation, we propose Flow-CLIP, which refines global image-text alignment through image-conditioned changes in token--patch evidence. Global Compatibility Calibration (GCC) learns a sentence-level similarity metric, while Image-Conditioned Evidence Refinement (ICER) incorporates visual patch context into token queries and uses the resulting change in local matching evidence to adjust the global score. We further introduce Cross-Image Margin Ranking (CIMR), which compares the same positive--negative caption pair across matched and mismatched images, encouraging a larger ranking margin when the image supports the correct description. Experiments on compositional matching and attribute--object binding benchmarks show that Flow-CLIP improves binding accuracy over pretrained CLIP and learned global alignment through local evidence refinement, while cross-image ranking supervision mitigates reliance on language priors. Code will be released at link.

Thu 15 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Matching pictures with sentences is hard when sentences describe similar objects in different ways. The authors introduce Flow-CLIP, a method that looks closely at details in images to better understand how words relate to specific parts of a picture. They adjust the overall match score by seeing how well each word pairs with image patches. Their approach also trains the model to distinguish correct captions from wrong ones more reliably by comparing across multiple images. This makes matching more accurate, especially when objects and their descriptions mix in complex ways.
Open → 2610.21937v1