Papers for

multimedia indexing teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Multimodal video retrieval improves when fusion order matches query details

When Fusion Order Matters: Insights on Progressive Multimodal Representation Learning for Cross-modal Retrieval

Abstract: Multimodal video retrieval combines visual, acoustic, and speech information, yet how their fusion order should depend on the data and the retrieval query remains unclear. We introduce Unified Progressive Representation Learning for Order Analysis, or UniPRO, to investigate this question through configurable fusion schedules with matched model components and training settings. Starting from text-to-video retrieval, we find that the tested one-by-one schedules outperform stacked fusion, while changing the order within one-by-one fusion also changes performance. To guide order selection, we examine two complementary considerations: learning difficulty under unequal modality availability and preservation of information relevant to the query. Complete-modality controls show that missing inputs alone cannot explain order sensitivity. At R@1, text and audio retrieval favor schedules that introduce the modality matching the query last. Controlled speech missingness during training and testing reverses the preferred order in both R@1 and SumR, with different crossover points. These findings motivate balancing the two considerations when selecting a fusion path. We then use them to predict a visual-last schedule for image queries, which achieves 97.9 R@1, the highest among the evaluated orders on MSR-VTT-9k. Main experiments on four text-to-video benchmarks establish the effectiveness of UniPRO, with component ablations assessing its supporting design. Together, the results identify fusion order as a task-dependent choice that should account jointly for modality availability and the retrieval query.

Mon 26 OctArtificial IntelligenceInformation Retrieval
The gist
Finding the best way to combine video, sound, and speech information for searching videos can be tricky. The authors tested different orders of mixing these types of information to see which work best depending on the search query. They found that adding the information type matching the search last often helps retrieval. Their approach helps choose the right order for combining data to improve search accuracy.
Open → 2610.35125v1

Video captioning system requests targeted observations for accuracy

OACap: Caption-Guided Active Observation for Detailed Video Captioning

Abstract: Unlike question answering, where a query specifies a perceptual target, open-ended detailed captioning must determine what evidence to acquire and how to integrate it into a coherent global description. We propose Observation-Adaptive Video Captioner (OACap), a caption-centered agent that turns unsupported or missing information into targeted observation requests, uses spatiotemporal tools to acquire evidence, and iteratively verifies and revises the caption. OACap captions consistently improve performance across general video-understanding benchmarks using a fixed text-only reader. To better diagnose the information they preserve, we introduce Factual-Semantic Captioning Bench (FSCap-Bench). Its Core-Support Factuality Score (CSFS) combines claim precision with importance-aware fact coverage and responds as expected to four controlled perturbation types on 93.0-98.3% of valid caption pairs. Its Cross-Modal Semantic Round-Trip Score (CSRS) measures semantic preservation through a video-caption-video-caption round trip by matching atomic facts from source and recovered captions. Together, they connect downstream textual-memory utility with factual and semantic preservation.

Wed 21 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionComputation and LanguageMultiagent Systems
The gist
Creating detailed captions for videos is difficult because the system must decide what parts of the video to look at and how to put that information together. The authors propose a system called OACap that asks for specific new observations when it lacks details, then updates its description accordingly. They also built new tests to check how well captions keep facts and meaning intact. Their system improves caption quality by focusing on accurate and important video details.
Open → 2610.29327v1

Audio visual models fail global speech vision tasks despite local visual clues

Local Evidence, Global Failure: Diagnosing Speech-Vision Temporal Composition in Audio-Visual Language Models

Abstract: Audio-visual large language models (AV-LLMs) can fail at full-video speech-vision decisions even when useful visual evidence is locally recoverable. We introduce Temporal Evidence Decomposition (TED), a training-free diagnostic framework that separates local visual verification from speech-relative aggregation. Automatic speech recognition supplies a transcript and utterance interval. TED queries audio-free windows with the transcript for Temporal Alignment and Forecasting, or answer candidates for Cross-Modal Temporal Binding, then aggregates evidence relative to that interval. Across four frozen AV-LLMs on SVHalluc, Temporal Forecasting accuracy rises from 29.3-33.7% under full-video questioning to 79.3-82.2% with TED. Query replacement reduces recovery; the observed anchor remains beneficial when temporal-region availability is held fixed. Physical-isolation and timing-shortcut controls test alternative explanations. The findings distinguish locally recoverable evidence from successful full-video decisions, motivating explicit separation of narration content, utterance timing, and time-indexed visual evidence.

Sun 18 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceMultimedia
The gist
Sometimes audio-visual language models can find visual clues in video segments that match spoken words, but still fail to decide correctly when looking at the full video. The authors introduce a method called Temporal Evidence Decomposition (TED) that checks local visual evidence separately from how this evidence is combined over time. They show that using TED can greatly improve understanding of where and how these models fail. The work highlights that speech content, timing, and visual evidence need to be treated as separate elements for better video-language model performance.
Open → 2610.25352v1

Frame-wise saliency improves audio moment retrieval accuracy and speed

Revisiting Frame-Wise Saliency for Audio Moment Retrieval

Abstract: This paper revisits frame-wise saliency for audio moment retrieval (AMR). We show that the frame-wise saliency sequence, conventionally used only as an auxiliary output in DETR-based AMR models, can itself serve as an effective source of moment predictions. We convert the saliency sequence into ranked moments using a simple SED-inspired segmentation rule with no learned parameters, enabling moment retrieval directly from frame-wise temporal information. On the CASTELLA dataset, saliency-based prediction consistently outperforms decoder-based prediction from the same model across all 18 runs of QD-DETR and CG-DETR. For QD-DETR, simply replacing the inference output improves R1@0.7 from 21.0 to 36.1. The advantage remains 7-15 points when the two outputs are evaluated at their independently selected best epochs. The same tendency extends to TaskWeave and UVCOM, whereas TR-DETR shows the opposite behavior, suggesting that how saliency construction may matter. The performance gap is especially pronounced for short moments: for queries whose annotated moments average at most 2 s, R1@0.7 improves from 6.3 to 27.8 with QD-DETR. Decoder supervision nevertheless benefits saliency-based prediction, indicating that its role during training differs from the utility of its inference output.

Mon 5 OctMultimediaSound
The gist
Finding precise parts of audio that match a query is hard. The authors looked at using a sequence that highlights important audio frames, called frame-wise saliency, rather than more complex prediction methods. They showed this simple approach performs better in locating exact audio moments, especially short ones, across different models and datasets. Moreover, mixing this saliency method with traditional training helps improve outcomes.
Open → 2610.05737v1

Perception grounded test time learning improves audio reasoning accuracy

Listen Then Reason: Perception-Grounded Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Large Audio-Language Models

Abstract: Large audio-language models (LALMs) are increasingly used for a broader range of audio reasoning tasks. These models typically incorporate audio representations into a large language model (LLM) backbone to enable multimodal reasoning. Recent test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) methods further improve LLM reasoning capability by leveraging unlabelled test data after pre-training. However, the importance of the perceptual capability of LALMs remains underexplored, particularly how much acoustic evidence is integrated and relied upon during reasoning, and how this contributes to final task performance. This gap limits the development of effective post-training methods like TTRL for audio reasoning. In this work, we first analyse how audio information is integrated and utilised during reasoning process. We quantify layer-wise perceptual reliance and show that stronger acoustic reliance is associated with higher accuracy and a larger performance gain attributable to the audio input. Building on this, we propose Perception-Grounded TTRL (PG-TTRL), which aligns label-free test-time optimisation with perceptually grounded reasoning, encouraging the model to structure its reasoning more strongly on the audio input. Experiments across LALMs and benchmarks show that PG-TTRL consistently improves reasoning performance over both the base models and standard TTRL, showing the value of perceptual-grounding optimisation for test-time audio reasoning.

Sun 20 SeptSoundArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Big models that understand both sound and language can solve tasks that need listening and thinking. The authors studied how much these models actually rely on the sound they hear when making decisions. They found that models that pay more attention to the audio tend to do better. Based on this, they created a new way to improve the models during testing by encouraging them to trust the sound more. This method makes the models better at solving tasks that involve understanding audio.
Open → 2609.23589v1

Audio representations improve by aligning sounds with text descriptions

Semantic Refinement of Universal Audio Representations through Audio-Description Alignment

Abstract: Universal audio representations must preserve acoustic detail while making high-level concepts accessible across speech, music, environmental sound, and downstream models of different capacities. We study semantic refinement of an acoustically pretrained encoder by adding audio-description alignment to a foundation of BEST-RQ, reconstruction, and CTC. We compare matched control, shuffled-description, and correctly paired trajectories to distinguish correct correspondence from an extra contrastive objective. Each endpoint is frozen and evaluated with a temporal-mean linear probe and a sequence-aware LLM readout, testing whether the refined information is directly accessible and remains useful to a stronger model. Across three paired seeds, correct alignment improves domain-balanced classification by 4.66 points with the linear probe and 2.59 points with the sequence-aware LLM, with positive changes in every domain. Correct pairing accounts for 87% of the linear-probe gain, while the LLM shows its clearest correspondence-specific benefit in captioning. Dense acoustic objectives provide complementary gains under both readouts. A separate 24-layer continuation remains competitive with leading public encoders under the shared evaluator, supporting the recipe beyond the controlled study.

Tue 8 SeptSound
The gist
Making computers understand different sounds like speech, music, and environmental noises is tricky. The authors improved a sound understanding tool by teaching it to match audio clips with their text descriptions. This matching helps the computer learn better high-level ideas while still keeping detailed sound info. Their approach showed clear gains when tested with simple and advanced models, especially helping in tasks like generating captions for sounds.
Open → 2609.08429v1