Papers for

multilingual voice assistant developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Speech models detect mixed languages without transcripts

Code-Switching Detection via Language-Selective Dimensions in Speech Foundation Models

Abstract: Code-switching (CS), the alternation between languages within an utterance, is common in multilingual speech but underrepresented in pretraining corpora. Increasing CS coverage requires finding relevant utterances in large speech collections so that they can be included in training data. One way to find such utterances is to transcribe the speech and detect language alternation in the text, but this depends on obtaining accurate multilingual transcriptions. We propose a lightweight method that detects CS directly from speech. It uses frame-level language information in pretrained speech encoders to determine whether both languages are present within an utterance. Specifically, we identify language-selective hidden-state dimensions using monolingual recordings and aggregate their frame-level activations into a CS prediction. With a small CS set used to tune a decision rule, we show that the Whisper-small encoder achieves a mean F1 of $0.798$ across 14 language pairs in CS-FLEURS, compared with $0.776$ for a CNN and $0.751$ for a HuBERT linear baseline trained for monolingual language identification. Our findings suggest that pretrained speech encoders already encode the information needed to identify CS utterances, and they provide a lightweight tool for building more representative multilingual corpora.

Tue 13 OctComputation and Language
The gist
People often switch between languages while speaking, but computer models usually struggle to detect this directly from audio. The authors show that existing speech models already have clues embedded in certain internal parts that can tell when two languages appear in the same spoken sentence. By pinpointing these parts and combining their signals, their method recognizes language switching more accurately than some other approaches, and without needing to convert speech to text first. This can help make better collections of multilingual speech data.
Open → 2610.18726v1

Acoustic and content attacks impact multilingual voice anonymization effectiveness

Exploiting Acoustic and Content-Oriented Speaker Verification Attacks Against Multilingual Voice Anonymization

Abstract: Attacker ASV systems for voice anonymization have been studied primarily in English, leaving their behavior in multilingual settings largely unexplored. Conventional ASV has shown that both acoustic and contextual information are important for multilingual speaker verification. Inspired by this, we investigate whether the same holds for attacker ASV on anonymized speech. We evaluate both acoustic- and content-oriented attackers on multilingual anonymized speech and construct a multilingual voice-converted dataset to improve cross-lingual generalization. Our results show that attacker effectiveness depends on the linguistic utility of the anonymized speech. Overall, acoustic-oriented attackers achieve better performance. However, when linguistic information is well preserved, the performance gap between content- and acoustic-oriented attackers narrows compared with conditions involving stronger speech distortion. The multilingual voice-converted dataset further improves performance and partially reduces the cross-lingual gap. These findings highlight the need for more comprehensive attacker modeling and evaluation protocols that consider both privacy and utility, rather than relying on a attacker strategy\footnote{Full code and pretrained models and MultiVC Dataset link are available at: https://github.com/monkeyDarefeen/DAST

Tue 6 OctSoundArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Voice anonymization tries to hide who is speaking while keeping the message understandable. The authors studied how attacks on voice anonymization work across different languages. They found that attacks focusing on sound features generally work better, but when the voice still sounds clear and content is preserved, attacks focusing on speech content get closer in success. They also created a new multilingual voice dataset that helps attackers across languages do better. This shows that protecting voice privacy requires understanding both the sound and the speech meaning.
Open → 2610.08107v1

HINTT compares cascaded and unified speech models for multilingual diarization and transcription

HINTT Submission to the 2nd MLC-SLM Challenge: Comparing Cascaded and Unified Approaches to Diarization and ASR

Abstract: This paper presents the HINTT system submitted to the 2nd Challenge and Workshop on Multilingual Conversational Speech Language Model (MLC-SLM). We address multilingual speaker-attributed ASR, where systems must determine who spoke when and what was spoken. We investigate two modeling strategies for this problem: a cascaded pipeline that combines speaker diarization with speech-LLM-based ASR, and a unified speech LLM that directly generates speaker labels, timestamps, and transcriptions. Our final submission is based on the cascaded pipeline, consisting of a fine-tuned DiariZen diarization model, a fine-tuned Qwen3-ASR model, and LLM-based generative error correction. For comparison, we also fine-tune VibeVoice-ASR as a unified model using the same official training data. All task-specific fine-tuning and model selection are performed using only the official MLC-SLM data, without external data or pseudo-labels. Experimental results demonstrate that the cascaded system remains more reliable under the MLC-SLM Task 1 conditions, while unified speech LLMs offer a promising direction for future speaker-attributed ASR.

Tue 6 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Understanding who said what and when in a conversation across multiple languages is a tricky problem. The paper describes two ways to solve this: one that breaks the task into steps (finding speakers first, then transcribing), and another that tries to do everything at once with a single model. The authors find that, for this challenge, their step-by-step method works more reliably, but the all-in-one approach shows promise for the future.
Open → 2610.08063v1

Eloquence improves multilingual audio quiz answering accuracy

The Eloquence submission for Task 2 of the Interspeech 2026 MLC-SLM challenge

Abstract: This paper details the Eloquence team's approach to Task 2 of the 2nd MLC-SLM challenge at Interspeech 2026, which involves multilingual Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) across 21 languages. Three approaches are explored. First, we fine-tune Voxtral-Mini-3B via LoRA with cross-lingual data augmentation, ASR transcript augmentation and timestamp-aware audio cropping, achieving 0.72 macro-accuracy on evaluation Phase 2. Second, we apply multimodal in-context learning (ICL) to the frozen Voxtral-24B model to correct a strong label bias, reaching 0.81, our best result. Third, a training-free retrieval system based on a three-layer voice-anchored memory combining acoustic identity, semantic content, and a knowledge graph achieves 0.68. All three systems substantially outperform the official baseline.

Thu 10 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Answering multiple-choice questions from audio in many languages is hard because of differences in speech and text. The Eloquence team tried three ways to solve this: changing a smaller model with added language variation and audio tweaks, using a big fixed model to fix mistakes by looking at examples, and a system that remembers sounds, meanings, and facts without training. Their best method reached 81% accuracy, beating the existing baseline by a lot.
Open → 2609.11724v1