Papers for

multilingual search developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

UAE GovTrust improves bilingual public service retrieval with scope filtering

UAE GovTrust Scope Filtering Gains and Routing Failures in Bilingual Public Service Retrieval

Abstract: Public-service queries can mention several locations while only one controls the requested service. We study this distinction in UAE GovTrust, a controlled English-Arabic retrieval diagnostic comprising 22 authored service summaries and 50 scenarios with 110 query variants. Twelve methods separate lexical and dense ranking, rank fusion, scope filtering, a multilingual cross-encoder, and direct service lookup. On 72 matched answerable queries with bilingual evidence, role-filtered reciprocal rank fusion retrieves a relevant first result for 69 queries (95.8%), versus 47 (65.3%) for unfiltered fusion; filtered dense retrieval and direct lookup each achieve 68 (94.4%). With English-only evidence, excluding zero-score lexical candidates raises filtered fusion from 52 to 64 correct first hits. However, the unchanged router selects the correct action and scope for only 2 of 168 post-audit perturbations covering paraphrases, irrelevant facts, negation, and corrections. These perturbations are deliberately authored diagnostics, not held-out evaluation. Fresh-environment execution reproduces all 1,320 original ranking orders and actions. The results show that correct scope metadata can improve ranking while brittle scope inference can remove the evidence needed to answer. The study evaluates retrieval and routing, not generated answers or legal correctness; independent Arabic and domain validation remains necessary.

Fri 23 OctInformation Retrieval
The gist
Public service questions often mention many locations, but only one location actually controls the service needed. The authors studied a system called UAE GovTrust that helps find the right public service information in both English and Arabic. Their methods showed that filtering by the correct location scope greatly improved search accuracy. However, when the system had to decide how to route queries with tricky changes or corrections, it mostly failed. This means the system works well for ranking results but struggles with understanding complex query variations.
Open → 2610.32608v1

Multilingual text embeddings improved with paired residual removal method

Steering beyond Language: Improving Multilingual Training-Free Text Embeddings via Paired-Residual Subspace Removal

Abstract: While deriving text embeddings directly from frozen LLMs has emerged as a promising direction, existing methods focus almost exclusively on English, leaving multilingual settings largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first systematic study of multilingual training-free text embeddings in LLMs. Our analysis reveals a language-conditioned embedding geometry in which semantically equivalent sentences remain misaligned across languages. We hypothesize that language-specific variation can be disentangled from semantic content to improve embedding quality. To this end, we propose Paired-Residual Subspace Removal (PRSR), a training-free inference-time intervention that steers LLM representations toward a more language-invariant semantic space. PRSR first constructs paired residuals from multilingual parallel sentences to capture language-specific deviations. It then estimates layer-wise low-rank subspaces from these residuals and suppresses the corresponding components in the last-token hidden states. We conduct more than 200 monolingual evaluations across 18 languages using MTEB and MMTEB, along with cross-lingual bitext mining between English and over 200 other languages. Empirical results demonstrate that PRSR consistently improves the performance of existing training-free baselines in both monolingual and cross-lingual settings across different LLMs.

Fri 16 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Generating good text representations in many languages is challenging because similar sentences in different languages do not line up well in the model’s understanding. The authors studied how language-specific differences affect these representations and developed a way to reduce these differences without retraining the models. Their method compares pairs of sentences that mean the same thing in different languages and removes the parts that are unique to each language, helping the model focus on shared meaning. This approach improved performance on tasks involving many languages without needing extra training.
Open → 2610.23807v1