Papers for

multilingual nlp product teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Typological features predict cross-lingual transfer without extra computing

Zero-Compute Cross-Lingual Transferability Estimation Using Typological Feature Proxies

Abstract: Cross-lingual transfer describes how knowledge in a source language benefits a target language. Measuring it quantitatively requires broad multilingual pre-training, as prior work has done with cross-lingual transfer matrices. We ask whether transfer is predictable from freely available typological features, and whether the prominence of high-resource source languages reflects typology or data quality and quantity. We show that typological databases contain cheap and dense signals about cross-lingual transfer. Our typology-only random forest on a 24-language prior-work transfer matrix scores leave-one-language-out $ρ{=}0.705$ and $R^2{=}0.49$, beating a non-typological control at $ρ{=}0.62$, which verifies the ability of typology-only predictions to reconstruct costly measured cross-lingual transfer. The signal survives leave-one-script-out and leave-one-family-out protocols, so script and family confounding do not explain the effect. By decomposing the transfer into a typology term and a resource-and-script bias term, we find the best-source ranking sensitive to this bias. In contrast, typology is not affected by this bias, which makes it a zero-compute screening tool that replaces hundreds of training runs with a model fit. Our code is available \href{https://github.com/dharmsen/typo-x-ling-transfer}{here}.

Wed 30 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Understanding how language skills in one language help another usually requires lots of data and training. The authors found that simple language features from existing databases can predict how well this transfer happens without extra computation. They used these features to almost match results that normally need expensive training, showing that language relationships explain much of the transfer. Their method works even when ignoring related writing systems or language families, making it a quick way to estimate cross-language benefits.
Open → 2609.39640v1