Papers for

multilingual content platforms

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Cross lingual summarization improves Marathi to English text summaries

Cross Lingual Abstractive Summarization for Marathi

Abstract: Text summarization is an important task for advancing natural language processing (NLP) research and applications in Indic languages. Despite progress in extractive and abstractive summarization, both monolingual summarization (MS) and cross-lingual summarization (CLS) remain relatively underexplored for these languages. Recent advances in Transformer architectures, pretrained language models (PLMs), and dataset availability offer new opportunities to address this gap. In this work, we construct cross-lingual training data from the monolingual Marathi MahaSum corpus and combine it with the smaller cross-lingual PMIndiaSum dataset to fine-tune IndicTrans2, an Indic neural machine translation model. We evaluate the resulting models using ROUGE, chrF and chrF++ metrics, focusing primarily on Marathi-to-English summarization due to computational constraints. We also discuss the applicability of our approach to the English-to-Marathi direction. Our experiments demonstrate that leveraging a pretrained translation model yields substantially better summarization performance than the IndicBART and mBART-50 based baselines reported in previous work on cross-lingual summarization.

Wed 28 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Summarizing text in different languages is hard, especially for Indian languages like Marathi. The authors worked on making summaries that translate Marathi text into English summaries using advanced machine learning models. By combining existing Marathi data and a smaller translated dataset, they improved the quality of these summaries better than previous methods. Their work mainly focused on translating Marathi to English summaries but discussed the reverse direction as well.
Open → 2610.38267v1

Pseudo-references enable machine translation evaluation without human translations

In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for MT Evaluation

Abstract: The WMT26 General MT task evaluates systems on 10 language pairs that have no human references (neither translated from scratch nor post-edited from MT output by humans). We describe how we built the pseudo-references for these pairs and six other language pairs (in which some forms of human references are available): seven models translate the 3,277 official documents under up to five prompt conditions, giving a total of 26 system-prompt combinations; then three reference-free quality estimation (QE) models score every candidate; and a per-document selector picks one translation, which GPT-5.5 post-edits where needed. Working without references exposed a failure mode of QE-guided selection: the metrics rank fluent output in the wrong language above correct translations. Adding a confidence-scaled language identification penalty to the score fusion drives the wrong-language count to zero, and the resulting selector still scores better on MetricX than the rank-fusion baseline it replaces. Since no references were available for these pairs while we were building them, we calibrate every selection decision on last year's WMT25 human judgments. The human evaluation, released after construction, shows the cost of getting selection wrong: our references stand with the strongest participating systems when the selector kept a frontier-model candidate, and fall up to 17 ESA points below them when it did not. We release the selection method and the provenance of every reference (https://github.com/surrey-nlp/PseudoRef)

Fri 11 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
When evaluating machine translation systems, having human translations as a reference is helpful but not always possible. The authors built ‘pseudo-references’ by combining outputs from several translation models, then selecting and refining the best one using quality checks and AI post-editing. They discovered a problem where the system sometimes chose translations in the wrong language and fixed it by adding a language check penalty. Their method was tested against past human judgments and showed that good selection improves evaluation quality significantly.
Open → 2609.13611v1

Fixed range chunking improves translation quality for long documents

Doc2FRC: Length-Consistent Document-Level Machine Translation via Fixed-Range Chunking

Abstract: Advanced large language models (LLMs) with long context windows can substantially reduce input truncation in document-level machine translation (DocMT). However, direct Doc2Doc translation remains prone to n-gram repetition and progressive quality degradation. A common remedy is to segment the document into finer-grained chunks. Nonetheless, conventional rule-based chunking approaches fail to handle the length distribution mismatch between training and inference. To address this, we introduce Fixed-Range Chunking (FRC), utilizing dynamic programming to partition documents into chunks within a predefined length interval. By consistently applying FRC during training and inference, the input documents of any length are mapped to the same length distribution, substantially reducing train-test length mismatch. Centered on FRC, we propose a lightweight dual-boundary matching algorithm for chunk alignment, alongside four distinct training strategies. Experimental results show that FRC-based fine-tuning substantially improves 7B LLMs over direct Doc2Doc fine-tuning and outperforms existing DocMT methods on IWSLT2017. We further construct GlobVDoc, a 10-language test set independent of mainstream DocMT training sources, and show that FRC improves out-of-distribution document translation.

Fri 11 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Long documents are hard for translation programs because they often cut off parts or repeat words, leading to worse results. The authors created a way to split documents into chunks of consistent length for both training and translating. This method helps the program learn better and keeps translation quality steady even on new types of documents. It worked well in tests with multiple languages and different data sets.
Open → 2609.12674v1