Papers for

multilingual content managers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

UvA-MT improves machine translation by refining and judging outputs

UvA-MT's Participation in the WMT26 General Translation Shared Task

Abstract: This paper presents UvA-MT's submission to the WMT 2026 General Machine Translation shared task, competing in the unconstrained track across all 23 translation directions. This year, we fully leverage the test-time methods of Large Language Models (LLMs) for machine translation. Specifically, (1) we use sequential sampling with a refinement prompt to generate a pool of translation candidates for each source segment, a strategy shown to outperform traditional parallel sampling; and (2) we employ LLMs as pairwise judges to select the best candidate via a round-robin voting mechanism, with offline evaluation on the WMT25 benchmark showing a very clear improvement over point-wise best-of-N selection. Combined, these two strategies form our WMT26 submission.

Tue 20 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Machine translation aims to turn sentences from one language into another accurately. UvA-MT's team improved this by first generating many translation options for each sentence using a step-by-step approach. Then, they used large language models to compare these options and pick the best one through voting rounds. Their tests showed this method works better than simply picking the best single option directly.
Open → 2610.27852v1

Lightweight zero-shot text classification with label-centric knowledge retrieval

Label-Centric Knowledge Retrieval for Zero-Shot Text Classification

Abstract: Flagship large language models (LLMs) offer rich general knowledge and strong reasoning capabilities, but their high inference cost and latency limit their use for large-scale data labeling. We study zero-shot text classification with semantically meaningful labels and task descriptions, without task-specific labeled examples or classifier feedback. We propose \textbf{SLKR} (Semantic Label Knowledge Retrieval), a label-centric retrieval-augmented generation framework that separates offline knowledge construction from lightweight online inference. Offline, a flagship LLM independently generates label definitions, retrieval keywords, and boundary rules for potentially confusable label pairs, forming a reusable label-knowledge store. Because this construction operates over the label space rather than the input corpus, its one-time flagship cost can be amortized across large-scale inference. Online, hybrid semantic and lexical retrieval first identifies the top-$K$ candidate labels and then selects up to $M$ input-relevant boundary rules connecting candidate-label pairs. A lightweight LLM performs the final classification in a single call using the retrieved definitions and rules. Across three public benchmarks and a real-world multilingual book-classification dataset, SLKR achieves the best results on all four datasets with Qwen3.5-4B and on three of four with Ministral-3-3B, while using compact input contexts and no task-specific labeled examples. Boundary ablations further show that retrieving a small set of input-relevant rules preserves performance close to using all boundaries with substantially less context, supporting efficient reuse of flagship-generated label knowledge for lightweight classification.

Mon 12 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Classifying text into categories without training data is challenging and usually slow with large AI models. The authors propose a method called SLKR that creates detailed label information offline using a powerful language model once, then uses this info to quickly classify many texts. Their approach retrieves label definitions and rules relevant to the input texts to help a smaller model decide the correct categories. This method works well on several benchmarks and a real-world dataset, achieving good accuracy with less computation.
Open → 2610.16182v1