Papers for

multilingual chatbot teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Training with ciphers improves rare term translation in large models

Training with Ciphers to Enhance In-Context Terminology Learning For Translation from Rare Languages

Abstract: Fine-tuning LLMs with in-context examples (IC-Train) lets translation models adapt to new parallel data at deployment, but it is unclear whether they actually learn the translations of rare terms from those examples. We formalize this capability as in-context term learning (ICTL). We show that standard IC-Train develops this capability only weakly, and propose RareCipherFT, which strengthens it without any lexical resources. RareCipherFT pairs each training target with in-context examples that share a rare term with it. It then replaces that term with a character-shuffled cipher in both the context and the reference, so the term can only be recovered by copying from context. The ciphered fraction of training data is annealed to preserve translation quality. Across seven translation directions between English and Tamil, Assamese, Mizo, Nepali and Hausa, and four models from 1B to 7B parameters, RareCipherFT raises term recall over standard IC-Train by 5-15 absolute points without lowering COMET. Probes using synonyms, nonce words and controls for shared surface context show that these gains come from linking source terms to their in-context translations rather than from shortcuts.

Sat 17 OctComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Large language models can learn to translate new words by using examples shown during deployment, but they struggle with rare or unfamiliar terms. The authors identify this problem and introduce a method called RareCipherFT, which hides rare words in examples by scrambling their letters so the model must copy them to learn accurately. Their approach helps models remember and translate rare words better across several languages without hurting overall translation quality. Tests confirm the improvements come from linking source and target rare terms, not from accidental shortcuts.
Open → 2610.24593v1

HexaBee-4B improves six-language machine translation with bidirectional training

HexaBee-4B: Six-Language Translation with Multilingual Answering and Bidirectional Supervision

Abstract: Multilingual translation requires a model to preserve meaning while producing text in a requested language. We present HexaBee-4B, a translator adapted from Gemma 3 4B IT through three stages: Wikipedia continued pretraining, joint multilingual answering and answer-text translation, and bidirectional translation specialization. The intermediate stage connects two tasks through shared multilingual answers: answering a question in the requested language and translating an answer into that language. It comprises 19.46 million answering records, including 5.76 million cross-language question-answer pairs, and 10.70 million answer-text translations. The final stage uses 658,274 forward and reverse synthetic translation examples. On 36,572 synthetic test examples spanning all 30 directions among Arabic, Chinese, English, Hebrew, Persian, and Spanish, HexaBee-4B achieves direction-macro chrF++ of 73.75, compared with 57.11 for Gemma 3 4B IT and 66.83 for Gemma 3 12B IT. BLEU, TER, COMET, and a matched model-judged subset support the same overall ranking. These results demonstrate improved translation across the six-language set, with chrF++ gains in every evaluated direction over both baselines.

Mon 12 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Translating text between many languages can be hard because the meaning must stay the same. The authors created HexaBee-4B, a computer program that translates six languages better by training it through answering questions and translating answers both ways. They trained it with a lot of multilingual data and tested it using examples between Arabic, Chinese, English, Hebrew, Persian, and Spanish. Their method improved translation quality on all language pairs compared to earlier versions.
Open → 2610.16361v1

Large language models give lower-quality answers to non-native English users

Lost in Translation: Measuring the Effect of Non-Native English on End User Performance of Large Language Models

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by people whose first language is not English, yet these users have been shown to receive systematically lower-quality responses than fluent speakers. Which specific features of non-native English drive this gap remains unclear, because fluency is itself a composite of mechanical accuracy, vocabulary use, organization, and discourse coherence. Here, we introduce FABLE, a controlled dataset of 190,911 English prompt variants derived from 174K real user prompts for writing-related tasks. Evaluating responses from 34 open-weight LLMs, we find a clear asymmetry; while models do not propagate surface errors such as misspellings into their outputs, models do mirror higher-level rhetorical and lexical qualities present in the user's prompt. Further, the overall quality of responses differs substantially between the least- and most-fluent prompts. These results highlight a key LLM performance disparity for non-native English LLM users, resulting in both lower-quality and less-fluent answers.

Mon 28 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
People who do not speak English as their first language often get less helpful answers from large language models (LLMs). The authors studied which aspects of non-native English cause this problem by creating a large dataset of prompts written in different English styles. They found that while simple mistakes like spelling errors don’t reduce answer quality, more complex issues like unclear organization and unusual word choices do. This means people speaking less fluent English may receive worse and less natural responses from these AI tools.
Open → 2609.36214v1

Language models show consistent moral biases across multiple languages

Geometry of Values: Task Vector Composition for Ethical Preference Alignment in Language Models

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in applications that must weigh clashing moral values, yet even strong models exhibit hidden biases and brittle instruction-following across languages. We introduce a 12,000-instance dataset of two-option dilemmas covering pairwise three value conflicts: Honesty vs. Justice, Justice vs. Autonomy, and Autonomy vs. Honesty, along with their translations into Hindi, Arabic, Spanish, and Chinese, to probe cross-lingual behavior. Benchmarking on GPT-5-mini reveals that it consistently favors Honesty over Autonomy across all five languages when no policy is given. The Llama-3.2-1/3B models exhibit strong first-option bias; however, both plain fine-tuning and Direct Preference Optimization fine-tuning effectively remove this bias, increasing accuracy to greater than 98%. In order to decouple the effect of learning correlations in the dataset from abstract values, we propose a task vector transfer based experiment where after computing the task vectors for a direction of value preference we orthogonalize it with respect to the general instruction following vector. Our experiment shows that this method is effective in isolating the direction of the specific value preference that can successfully be used to conduct task arithmetic to obtain a model with the opposite stance.

Thu 17 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Large language models sometimes struggle to fairly balance moral values like honesty, justice, and autonomy, especially when faced with tough choices. The researchers created a large dataset of moral dilemmas translated into several languages to study how these models perform across languages. They found that some models had strong biases, often favoring honesty over autonomy, but training techniques helped reduce these biases dramatically. They also developed a new method to isolate and control these value preferences within the models, allowing the model’s stance on ethical questions to be adjusted systematically.
Open → 2609.21094v1