Papers for

multi agent system developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Multi agent llm interactions reveal detailed information sharing patterns

Beyond Final Outcomes: Quantifying Claim-Level Information Dynamics in Multi-Agent LLM Interaction

Abstract: When LLM-powered agents interact, information is repeatedly shared, expanded, and forgotten, yet multi-agent evaluation typically focuses on final task outcomes. We study such interaction as claim-level information dynamics and propose RIVER, which decomposes agent outputs into atomic claims and evaluates three complementary dimensions: convergence, exploration, and retention. Convergence captures cross-agent claim correspondence and stance alignment; exploration captures semantic breadth and extension beyond the source; and retention tracks source preservation and the persistence of new claims across stages and lineages. We evaluate five interaction strategies on 40 controlled news-generation cases. Repeatedly pooled interaction promotes convergence but narrows the information space, whereas distributed relay yields broader, less shared information. Further comparisons show that method-specific constraints increase exploration while weakening convergence and retention. Our findings suggest that collective information dynamics are better explained by underlying information-flow mechanisms than by simple downstream performance.

Fri 23 OctComputation and Language
The gist
When multiple AI agents powered by large language models talk to each other, they share, change, and sometimes forget information. The authors created a method called RIVER that breaks down these conversations into small claims and measures how much the agents agree, explore new ideas, and remember past information. They tested different ways the agents interact in a news generation task and found that repeated pooling makes the agents agree more but limits variety, while passing messages along creates more diverse information but less agreement. Overall, the way information flows affects how well the group works together more than just looking at their final answers.
Open → 2610.32333v1

Memory system boosts teamwork in multi agent ai systems

CoMem: Collective-Individual Memory Synergy for Evolutionary Multi-Agent Systems

Abstract: Designing effective memory mechanisms is crucial for advancing LLM-driven Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), helping agents learn together and perform better over time. While recent work has led to strong cooperation skills, most methods still use flat, unstructured memories, which easily get filled with noise and erase differences between agents. To address this, we introduce the concept of collective-individual memory synergy and propose CoMem, an architecture that unifies both private experience and shared knowledge for multi-agent learning. CoMem features:(i) Private Experience Sedimentation, which lets each agent keep and update its own useful memories over time;(ii) Collective Wisdom Curation, which carefully selects only widely proven ideas to be shared among agents;(iii)Parallel Dual-Stream Retrieval, which allows agents to draw both from their own memory and the group's wisdom, using clustering to ensure diversity.Experiments on ALFWorld and PDDL benchmarks show that CoMem achieves strong overall performance and robustly avoids memory pollution.

Mon 14 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Many AI agents working together need good memory systems to help them learn and cooperate better. The authors found that using a mix of private memories unique to each agent and shared memories common to all helps prevent confusion and forgetting. They built a system called CoMem that keeps individual useful memories, shares only well-tested ideas with the group, and lets agents pick from both kinds using smart methods. Tests showed CoMem helped agents perform better and kept their memories clean.
Open → 2609.15009v1