Papers for

ml engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Neural network spectra predict privacy risks from membership inference attacks

Predicting Privacy Leakage from Weight Spectral Density

Abstract: Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are widely used to audit the privacy disclosure risk of machine learning models, however current state-of-the-art attacks require training computationally expensive shadow models, making large-scale privacy evaluation impractical. In this work, we investigate whether inexpensive spectral metrics derived from the heavy-tailed self-regularisation framework can serve as proxies for MIA vulnerability. We evaluate several WeightWatcher spectral metrics on image and tabular classification tasks and compare their relationship with MIA privacy leakage against conventional measures of generalisation. Across datasets, stable rank exhibits a strong positive correlation with overall MIA success, while Log alpha-Norm shows a consistent negative correlation with MIA vulnerability at the low false-positive regime. These associations are observed to be stronger than those obtained using the generalisation gap. The results indicate that neural network spectra may contain information about privacy leakage that is not fully captured by conventional measures of overfitting, motivating spectral analysis as a promising direction for scalable privacy auditing.

Thu 10 SeptMachine LearningCryptography and SecurityNeural and Evolutionary Computing
The gist
Machine learning models can unintentionally reveal information about the data they were trained on, a problem measured by special attacks called membership inference attacks (MIAs). These attacks usually need a lot of extra work to test privacy risks. The authors found that by looking at certain patterns (called spectral metrics) in the model’s weights, they can estimate how vulnerable the model is to these privacy attacks without doing expensive tests. This new approach could help people check the privacy of many models more easily and quickly.
Open 2609.11780v1

Micro interventions reveal how language models will learn next

Target-Independent Micro-Interventions for Predicting Training Response Across Language-Model Families

Abstract: Benchmark scores describe what a checkpoint can do now, but they do not determine how it will respond to the next training episode. We measure this missing state by branching four short, standardized, target-independent micro-interventions from the same checkpoint and recording their effects in a common capability space. Together with current capability, these responses form L-State; its pulse block supports a flexible direct readout and a structure-preserving operator readout. Under smooth local dynamics, the operator construction admits an end-to-end cross-family bound with explicit source- and target-family coordinate heterogeneity. In three-family leave-one-family-out development, both pulse readouts reduce source-standardized MSE by 39.4% relative to capability alone, while separating the best response and direction estimates. On sealed GLM-4-9B, the direct and operator readouts reduce MSE by 71.8% and 78.3%, respectively, and the operator readout raises sign balanced accuracy from 0.366 to 0.754. On sealed Granite-3.1-8B, the direct readout reaches RMSE 0.544 and a development-fitted action-wise selector reaches 0.554, compared with 1.172 for capability alone. A five-family audit finds that the operator coordinate varies by action and family, and that modeling these deviations improves retrospective held-trajectory prediction. Target-independent interventions therefore expose training-response information that current capability misses, with direct and structured readouts covering complementary transfer regimes.

Tue 8 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Benchmark tests show what a language model can do now but don’t tell us how it will improve with more training. The authors propose making small, target-free tweaks—called micro-interventions—that reveal how a model might respond to further training. These responses, combined with current abilities, help predict future learning across different families of language models more accurately. Their method works better than just relying on the model’s existing capabilities and generalizes across various models.
Open 2609.08618v1