medical training centers

Abstract: Autonomous endoscopic navigation requires the policy model to predict actions from texture-poor monocular observations, make safe control decisions, and retain evidence of lesions after they leave the field of view. Existing vision-language-action (VLA) models primarily rely on visual appearance and short-term context, limiting geometric grounding and episode-level reporting. We introduce StenoVLA-3D, a 3D-aware VLA framework for navigating through stenotic regions. We integrate point-maps into the Cosmos-Reason 2 backbone through learned geometry-gated fusion, and also propose a temporal state branch to model traversal progress. Our reasoning-and-action backbone predicts grounded reasoning with actions, while dedicated heads estimate stenosis shape and generate the final lesion report. We further introduce EndoCausal, an episode-level dataset with lesion annotations, actions, and temporally grounded reasoning. On 40 held-out recorded test episodes, StenoVLA-3D reaches 95.2\% semantic accuracy and 83.4\% action accuracy. On the physical 3-DoF endoscope, it attains 88.9\% and 77.8\% task success in esophageal and colonic phantoms (36 trials each), substantially outperforming the evaluated baselines.

Abstract: Clinical education must prepare medical students to conduct safe and coherent patient interviews under conditions of uncertainty. Traditional standardized patient (SP) training is resource-intensive and difficult to scale. We developed a scaffolding-oriented multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) AI Standardized Patient (AI-SP) training platform1. The system includes a patient agent for simulated dialog, a tutor agent providing Socratic prompts without disclosing diagnostic information, and a turn-level evaluator agent that monitors clinical progress without revealing summative scores. In a randomized controlled study (N = 100 medical students), participants were assigned to either a multi-agent (MA) scaffolding condition or a control condition. All students completed two learning sessions under their assigned condition followed by an examination conducted in a patient only environment. Performance was assessed using a standardized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) based rubric. While no significant difference was observed in final diagnostic accuracy between groups, the multi-agent AI standardized patient system improved final examination scores compared to the control group utilizing structured progressive information disclosure; the most substantial and consistent improvements were observed in communication, the expression of empathy, and specific history-taking behaviors. These findings suggest that specialized LLM agents enhance the process quality of simulated clinical interviews without artificially inflating examination outcomes. To support future research, we release a multi-expert annotated dataset comprising transcripts, checklist annotations, turn-level evaluations, and OSCE-aligned scoring outcomes. This resource aims to facilitate the development of pedagogically grounded AI-SP systems and advance research on AI-supported clinical reasoning training.